kskboys
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 47,973
- Reaction score
- 50,824
Why? It's already been like that previously.Yes, changing the divisional format would create far more problems than it would solve
Why? It's already been like that previously.Yes, changing the divisional format would create far more problems than it would solve
The NBA did not do away with divisions.Does the NFL actually need divisions or could they just do away with them in favor of two conferences (like the NBA does)? You could do more matchups with the best squads and do away with certain divisions that do not produce enough fierce competition. More matchups of the highest seeds would likely benefit ratings and attendance. Force teams to have a more comprehensive approach to team building. What say you?
The NBA did not do away with divisions.
The 30 teams still are aligned in six 5-team divisions - 3 each for each conference.
What the NBA does in difference to the NFL --- the overall teams' won-loss regular season records in each conference determine the seedings for the top six playoff berths --- with the final two spots 7th & 8th seeds are determined by "play-in" games for the teams that finished 7th through 10th.
NBA teams still get acknowledged as a division winner (hanging a banner) - but could still have to start the playoffs on the road to a 2nd/3rd place division finisher that has a better record.
If the NFL would adopt the NBA's postseason format - the AFC South Division winner Texans and the NFC South Division titlelist Buccaneers would be the 5th seeds, thus going on the road to play the Browns and Eagles, respectively -- Because CLE was 11-6 to end 2023 to HOU at 10-7, and TB was 9-8 in the regular season to PHL having an 11-6 record.
In summary - keep the divisions...just seed the playoff qualifiers by their records.
That's an interesting topic. I actually think mixing up the divisions every year would add to the excitement of the schedule.Does the NFL actually need divisions or could they just do away with them in favor of two conferences (like the NBA does)? You could do more matchups with the best squads and do away with certain divisions that do not produce enough fierce competition. More matchups of the highest seeds would likely benefit ratings and attendance. Force teams to have a more comprehensive approach to team building. What say you?
I would keep the divisions but would change the playoffs format.Does the NFL actually need divisions or could they just do away with them in favor of two conferences (like the NBA does)? You could do more matchups with the best squads and do away with certain divisions that do not produce enough fierce competition. More matchups of the highest seeds would likely benefit ratings and attendance. Force teams to have a more comprehensive approach to team building. What say you?
Wouldn't hurt to shake things up a bit.Oops. I guess I’m thinking in terms of how postseason seeding is decided. I don’t see much of a point to divisions in the NFL. They don’t play more than one game a week typically which means it’s not useful for scheduling purposes.
I think you have a great Idea on your hands, the NFL should pay us to view their lousy games.Might as well.
They have ruined everything else that made the NFL great.
I think the games should all be pay per view. Now that the NFL has embraced gambling it's no longer a family show.
I don't know about that, but thatv17th game should be a regional match up. Dallas-Houston, Rams Chargers, Jets-Giants, etc. That would make more sense and make for rabid rivalries!Does the NFL actually need divisions or could they just do away with them in favor of two conferences (like the NBA does)? You could do more matchups with the best squads and do away with certain divisions that do not produce enough fierce competition. More matchups of the highest seeds would likely benefit ratings and attendance. Force teams to have a more comprehensive approach to team building. What say you?