true, but I wonder did you know that back then?? that was before all the internet stats sites, and in newspaper they didnt give passer ratings.
Today we have way more info, which is why many are more critical.
Back then it was all in the monday paper lol, few articles on the game , if you lived in dallas area, and that one little stats thing with first downs yds rushing etc.
In 92-93 dallas had a great defense and special teams, that are overlooked for winning the SB's.
The offense got all the credit for the wins, but those other 2 won many of those games.
I keep hearing about the defense being the dominant force in the 90's. So.eone even mentioned that their first SB featured the Bill's "prolific" offense matched against the Cowboys defense.
The facts are, the Cowboys offense scored more than the Bills that season. They were ranked higher in scoring points than the Cowboys defense in preventing them.
In 1992 the Cowboys were ranked #2 in scoring. The only reason they weren't ranked higher in yardage is because they were so efficient they didn't need those yards.
The Bills were ranked #3 in scoring and the Cowboys defense, although ranked first in yardage was #5 in preventing points.
In their second SB season both offense and defense was ranked #2 when it came to scoring. They were both ranked #3 in their 3rd SB season. During the season they lost to the 49ers in the conference game the offense was ranked #2 and the defense #3
Their success was both linked to each other. The defense would allow the offense more drives and improved field position while the offensive scoring turned opponent's offense into a one dimensional passing game as they struggled to keep up.
As far as the new improved methods that results in advanced stats, they must rely on more than simple production numbers like frequency and distance and specific results of a play. There is an element of opinion involved, if I'm not mistaken.
One such example is the determination as to whether a ball is "catchable". I'm sure there is some agreed upon "radius" used. However, let me ask as simple question?
Has an "uncatchable" ball ever been caught? For example, the acrobatic catches made by OBJ or some other. Where they deemed catchable at the time and, if so, was that the same criteria placed on all receivers?
Isn't the fact that calling the catch "atrobatic" imply that the ball was initially considered uncatchable?
How does that go down in advanced stats?