Twitter: Since 2017, Dak is 5-9 vs winning teams

[WillieBeamen]

0 yards on third down?

 

[visionary]

At this point Dallas should not sign him to an extension at all

This is a very very QB rich draft and Daks glaring deficiencies have been widely exposed

No team is gonna pay him even 25 mill/yr in the off season

Let him play out the season and test the FA market

Signing him long term will hold this franchise in mediocrity for several years

 

[9darter]

Yikes. That's by no means a good look.

 

[PJTHEDOORS]

Usually means Zeke sucked in those games. Reason for the losses.

 

[WillieBeamen]

Usually means Zeke sucked in those games. Reason for the losses.

Yes, Dak cant beat a good team unless Zeke goes offf

 

[G2]

Yep, one player. Well done.

 

[CyberB0b]

40 sacks. My God.

 

[shabazz]

Good thing Dakota never called out anyone else about INT's

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

0 yards on third down?

Lol you and Dan are both clowns it turns out

 

[jsb357]

0 yards on third down?

Is that true?

 

[Future]

What if Amari didn't drop that ball and scored the touchdown?

The Dak hate after that game is astronomically stupid. He wasn't great, but you can only blame 1 INT on him. Like Tony, he's playing on a team that actively hurts his chances.

 

[Hennessy_King]

Lol you and Dan are both clowns it turns out

Lol it's amazing the lengths and effort they go to.

 

[Jake]

So does Dak get credit for wins, get blame for losses, or both?

It appears to depend upon who you ask.

 

[Sydla]

I am always curious when they do this stat for QBs. Do they count teams with winning records when they played or winning records at the end of the season? I assume end of year records.

 

[WillieBeamen]

Lol you and Dan are both clowns it turns out

Welp it didnt take long for the first know-nothing to insert his ignorance into the discussion

 

[willia451]

Dak is a good NFL QB. Not great. Not even very good. Just good. OK if you prefer.

You have to be able to prepare and come up with a game plan that doesn't put Dak in situations where he is going to fail. In other words, you have to work with what you have.

Other teams win big games with QBs that are just...........OK.

We can't do that. Obviously.

 

[Super_Kazuya]

Dak slobberers calling out cherry picking stats is certainly an interesting case of pot and kettle. If I had a nickel for every time I read a Dak slobber-stat that started with “since Amari Cooper” or “outside of that 8 game stretch” I would certainly be in a good place financially.

 

[shabazz]

Dak is a good NFL QB. Not great. Not even very good. Just good. OK if you prefer.

You have to be able to prepare and come up with a game plan that doesn't put Dak in situations where he is going to fail. In other words, you have to work with what you have.

Other teams win big games with QBs that are just...........OK.

We can't do that. Obviously.

I can get with this. Great Head coach can win with mediocrity, Great Qb can win with mediocre coach. With our Cowboys neither are great so if they keep both it will be another 5 years of futility.......and probably alot of Yogurt and Chunky Beef commercials to come

 

[Sydla]

Dak slobberers calling out cherry picking stats is certainly an interesting case of pit and kettle. If I had a nickel for every time I read a Dak slobber-stat that started with “since Amari Cooper” or “outside of that 8 game stretch” I would certainly be in a good place financially.

This is true.

I think at this point, the Cowboys would be wise to let the season play out and then make a determination on Dak.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

Welp it didnt take long for the first know-nothing to insert his ignorance into the discussion

So you got exposed and this is your response? LMAO

Ignorance is now correcting wrongfully used stats?

Clown of the year
1a. WillieB
1b. Antonio Brown