SI's Andy Benoit thoughts on Cowboys FA

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,555
Reaction score
22,657
So everyone that has issues with me considering Carrol a JAG disagrees? Most would consider him at best a serviceable CB which is the definition of a JAG.

2ij2877.jpg
 
Last edited:

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Hush, he's on a roll.

Seriously, though. I think most of the reason people don't like Nola Carroll is because they remember Bradley Fletcher getting burned badly, they hear PHI fans saying 'good riddance,' and they assume they are the same people.
 

DeaconBlues

M'Kevon
Messages
4,374
Reaction score
1,585
I've grown to hate the term 'JAG.' One, because it sometimes gets confusing in context because of Jacksonville. Two, because people now use it to mean everything from 'quality starter I don't like' to 'overpaid starter who's actually pretty good, but did I mention he's overpaid' to actual JAGs.

Add "progress stopper". Used whenever a fan likes player A, but the coaching staff has decided on player B.

Annoys the hell out of me.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
So everyone that has issues with me considering Carrol a JAG disagrees? Most would consider at best a serviceable CB which is the definition of a JAG.

2ij2877.jpg


I disagree that he got embarrassed here, if that's what you're asking. Dez came back strong on the ball in what was otherwise fairly decent coverage. We've seen Dez do that dozens of times.

I consider Carroll a cut-rate Brandon Carr. And Carr was a cut-rate premium CB himself. But for an affordable boundary CB who plays both zone and man passably well, and a guy who can fill in in the slot and has a little size to him, Carroll was a decent and inexpensive piece in a secondary that needed some decent inexpensive pieces. I see nothing to complain about whatsoever in signings like this.
 

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,555
Reaction score
22,657
I am OK with him being depth on the roster but do not see him as a starter.
 

lukin2006

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,968
Reaction score
19,293
I'm not worried about the offensive line. if Collins is healthy we'll be fine at LG. I think everyone suspected we needed an upgrade at RT, or at least younger and more athletic...
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I am OK with him being depth on the roster but do not see him as a starter.

Ah. Me, either. I'm assuming he's a guy who comes in on 3rd downs, moves Scandrick into the slot, and we let him handle the outside coverage. And maybe a guy who gets some snaps in the slot himself if we want the DBs on the field but want a guy with a bit of size inside. Or an injury replacement CB.

We definitely need to draft a better long-term option fairly early on.
 

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
I've grown to hate the term 'JAG.' One, because it sometimes gets confusing in context because of Jacksonville. Two, because people now use it to mean everything from 'quality starter I don't like' to 'overpaid starter who's actually pretty good, but did I mention he's overpaid' to actual JAGs.
:hammer:
 

RoyTheHammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,801
Reaction score
1,850
What "growth" has Carroll shown the last two seasons? He was dreadful last year.

This reads like a homer here wrote this:

- Carroll is good
- Leary not so good, not a big loss
- Collins is a stud, most talented kid at his position in the league
- Jones is so good he makes it easier for the Cowboys to plug any schmuck in

LOL.

100% right on.
 

TNCowboy

Double Trouble
Messages
10,704
Reaction score
3,213
So everyone that has issues with me considering Carrol a JAG disagrees? Most would consider him at best a serviceable CB which is the definition of a JAG.

2ij2877.jpg
So were the guys we lost. Carr, Wilcox, and Church have always been jags. Claiborne had the ability to be more than that, but he never showed it on a consistent basis.
 
Top