zrinkill
Cowboy Fan
- Messages
- 49,029
- Reaction score
- 32,522
speedkilz88;1963809 said:Was he still dinged up when the Cowboys played them, because he looked done in that game.
Lots of people look done against T.O. when he is on.
speedkilz88;1963809 said:Was he still dinged up when the Cowboys played them, because he looked done in that game.
he was talking about fosterzrinkill;1963840 said:Lots of people look done against T.O. when he is on.
You need to check yourself. Just because his dad was a Cowboy, doesnt make him indebted to us.DeepBleu;1963851 said:if shawn springs is released by the skins, then we'll see how much he loves his father and how much he appreciates everson walls' kidney.
viman96;1963825 said:I'd love to have Shawn play for the Cowboys!
Rampage;1963843 said:he was talking about foster
:laugh2: it's all goodzrinkill;1963871 said:opps my bad ..... I had a brainbbgun
Hostile;1963781 said:Here's the veteran CB I've been saying I'd love to bring in. Do it Danny.
BraveHeartFan;1963894 said:So wait a minute...Springs is a good addition despite the fact that he is one of the guys T.O. raped in the Washington game here last year but Hall, whose 10 years younger, is a sack of crap cause guys like T.O. and Johnson can burn him?
yeah, that makes perfect sense.
tomson75;1963902 said:Um....I'm no Norman Einstien here, but I'm pretty sure Springs isn't going to a) require the contract that Hall would. b) expect to be the #1 Cb on the roster. c) be matched up against opposing teams' #1 receiver. d) bring a craptastic attitude to the team.
So yeah, I'll take a smarter, cheaper, arguably equally effective albeit older, option in Springs. Thanks, but Hall is still a sack of crap.
BraveHeartFan;1963910 said:I mean it's apples and oranges either way cause i don't really want either on the team, to be honest, but it's just silly to me that peoples huge CONCERN, outside of his attitude, is that Hall just gets beat up too much by teams elite recievers but they'll take an older guy who gets beat by those same elite recievers just as much.
BraveHeartFan;1963910 said:He will be cheaper, yes. The rest of the arguments are negotiable at best to me. Hall would be more expensive but he would allow us to have someone to replace Henry with in a couple of years where as Springs will be out of the league in 2 years, most likely.
If I were going to make either move, based soley on short term, then yeah I'd look at Springs too cause of the money.
But if you bring in a vet corner, instead of just drafting a couple, then I'd rather have the younger guy with the potential to get better around the right group of people, rather than the guy whose past his prime and isn't going to be around in 2 years.
I mean it's apples and oranges either way cause i don't really want either on the team, to be honest, but it's just silly to me that peoples huge CONCERN, outside of his attitude, is that Hall just gets beat up too much by teams elite recievers but they'll take an older guy who gets beat by those same elite recievers just as much.
Not to mention the whole "wont have to cover the #1's" is wishful thinking at best. The defense doesn't really get a 100% say in that since the offenses will routinely move their #1 WR's around to get them matched up against more favorable match ups and I don't recall Dallas moving Newman from side to side, in order to get all the 1 on 1 with the number 1 guy. They pretty much keep him on one side or the other, so yes, Springs would have to, at least some of the time, cover the #1 recievers.
DeepBleu;1963851 said:if shawn springs is released by the skins, then we'll see how much he loves his father and how much he appreciates everson walls' kidney.
Woods;1963778 said:If Springs is released, I'd love to bring him in for a couple of years and draft a CB Day 1 as well.
The rookie could learn from the vets and ease his way into the starting line up. In the meantime, we'd be 4 deep in corners.
InmanRoshi;1963812 said:Giving Drayton Florence a huge contract is so Snyder-like.