Rockport
AmberBeer
- Messages
- 46,320
- Reaction score
- 45,782
We really haven’t had any ball hawking CB’s in a long while either.I think it's the scheme because we really haven't been a big intercepting team in a long while.
We really haven’t had any ball hawking CB’s in a long while either.I think it's the scheme because we really haven't been a big intercepting team in a long while.
He gets it from the dredges of the internet’sI want to know where people are hearing this. It seems like the Eagles are said to be targeting this guy or that guy. Where is this information really coming from? It’s no secret they need to upgrade the back end of their D, but I doubt they just let the world know their actual plans...or any team for that matter.
It's rare that someone posts something that shocks me. But this post does. A LOT!!!
I'm saving this.
Yet we wanted and signed Brandon Carr because of his ball-hawking skills. But even he didn't deliver many interceptions for the Cowboys. He left and went to Baltimore and started intercepting passes.We really haven’t had any ball hawking CB’s in a long while either.
He played 16 games last year and had 0 int’s. He played 16 games the year before and had 2. You picked a horrible example to try and fit your agenda.Yet we wanted and signed Brandon Carr because of his ball-hawking skills. But even he didn't deliver many interceptions for the Cowboys. He left and went to Baltimore and started intercepting passes.
So out of all the CB's we've had in that long while, none of them had ball-hawking skills?
Sounds like a scheme issue to me.
And what agenda would that be?He played 16 games last year and had 0 int’s. He played 16 games the year before and had 2. You picked a horrible example to try and fit your agenda.
Obviously #1 Einstein.And what agenda would that be?
Relax, Sunshine. Everyone doesn't have an agenda. Some of us are just engaging in conversation.
But if I have an agenda, it's trying to interpret facts.
And the fact is that the Cowboys haven't been a team that creates turnovers. Even you said so yourself. Remember your "in a long while" statement?
Therefore, if we haven't been getting turnovers "in a long while" it either has to be …
1. We're not drafting and signing the right players, and, by extension, NONE of the players we've signed consistently create turnovers or ...
2. It's the SCHEME or CULTURE.
So which do you subscribe to? Or do you have another, agen, er, perspective?
Obviously #1 Einstein.
Jones is not a shut down corner, Sanders was a shut down corner. Plays can be made against Jones, no one should refer to him as shut down corner in my opinion.You mean the side that Cooper isn't lined up on ? 1-on-1 , does Jones shut down Amari ? I don't see that happening..........................
Jones is not a shut down corner, Sanders was a shut down corner. Plays can be made against Jones, no one should refer to him as shut down corner in my opinion.