So did Zeke actually do it?

[vlad]

I'll admit I don't have the motivation to read every last thing - and I just come here during lunch or whatever to hear from my favorite fans on the latest goings on about the play on the field...

So is it pretty safe to say that while the law didn't prosecute him, its very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend at the time?

 

[kevm3]

no, it's not pretty safe to say that unless some evidence came out that I'm not aware of.

 

[Outlaw Heroes]

So is it pretty safe to say that while the law didn't prosecute him, its very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend at the time?

No.

 

[Bleedblue1111]

I'll admit I don't have the motivation to read every last thing - and I just come here during lunch or whatever to hear from my favorite fans on the latest goings on about the play on the field...

So is it pretty safe to say that while the law didn't prosecute him, its very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend at the time?

You haven't read up on it yet? She was trying to blackmail him. It's all a sham.

 

[TrailBlazer]

Only 2 people know what happened.

 

[Shinaoi]

No one knows. And that's the reason you don't suspend someone unless you know for sure.

 

[Trouty]

I'll admit I don't have the motivation to read every last thing - and I just come here during lunch or whatever to hear from my favorite fans on the latest goings on about the play on the field...

So is it pretty safe to say that while the law didn't prosecute him, its very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend at the time?

No, it's not pretty safe to say that.

Go back to lunch. Try the Reuben. Or the taco truck.

 

[DFWJC]

I'll admit I don't have the motivation to read every last thing - and I just come here during lunch or whatever to hear from my favorite fans on the latest goings on about the play on the field...

So is it pretty safe to say that while the law didn't prosecute him, its very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend at the time?

We have no idea...

She seems like a whack, snake, etc....but we really dont know fir sure what happened.

Either way, I really cant stand how the NFL is allowed to run this stuff.

 

[xvendettax914]

For me personally, coming from a law enforcement and military family and background, do not feel comfortable saying that the NFL, who,mind you, can not decipher it's own on field rulings and rules which is it's sole purpose, did a better job investigating and mitigating evidence in what would be a criminal case than people who do this each day each hour. Once it left the police and DAs hands it should have been over.

 

[Sydla]

Honestly?

I don't know. But what I do know that in a case where circumstantial evidence is key, there is a crap ton more of it on Elliott's side than the NFL's. The victim's credibility is shot give her actions and especially since she got caught lying about one of the alleged incidents of abuse. Further, the NFL's actions and statements would seem to indicate they know they stepped in it and it's time to try to muddy the waters.

 

[Proximo]

So is it pretty safe to say that while the law didn't prosecute him, its very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend at the time?

There is an overwhelming amount evidence to cast reasonable doubt upon all of the domestic violence allegations.

It is clear now why this wasn't prosecuted in the court of law.

The "victim" is the only witness to said allegations, and as it turns out she's probably the most unreliable witness a prosecution could have.

The league's investigation was a sham.

 

[Trouty]

Vlad, you've never struck me this way. Why make this post with such absolutes?

"It's very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend"

WTBF?? How is it very likely?

 

[Zimmy Lives]

No, it's not pretty safe to say that.

Go back to lunch. Try the Reuben. Or the taco truck.

Yup.

The only thing one can assume is that they enjoyed a mutually beneficial, consenting relationship the average person would consider unconventional. That's it.

 

[DFWJC]

So is it pretty safe to say that while the law didn't prosecute him, its very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend at the time?

 

[waldoputty]

I'll admit I don't have the motivation to read every last thing - and I just come here during lunch or whatever to hear from my favorite fans on the latest goings on about the play on the field...

So is it pretty safe to say that while the law didn't prosecute him, its very likely he repeatedly abused his girlfriend at the time?

no one will know except zeke and skank.
i doubt nfl knows or cares unless they have a lot more evidence than has been leaked.
that is why they need to get out of the investigation business.

 

[Trouty]

Right, JC!?

 

[Dale]

Real police didn't think there was enough evidence to pursue charging him.

But the kangaroo court does.

So here we are.

 

[vlad]

Thanks for the feedback - that's what I was wondering about - not the ruling or the NFL overstepping etc... I think everything Goodell has done is ridiculous. But that doesn't mean he didn't do it. I hope he didn't, I just see a lot of homers. Hopefully all comes to light and his name is restored...and if he did do it, then he can suck it.

And @Trouty - what's the snarky reply man? That's not your style, you are one of my favorite posters because of that...although its pretty funny it got the most likes.

 

[Zimmy Lives]

That ESPN dog never gets old.

 

[Nirvana]

Once it left the police and DAs hands it should have been over.