Teague31;5071066 said:Nfl.com gave us the highest rating in the league
Doomsday101;5071074 said:I guess the ansewer will take a year or 2 to know. If these guys fail then it was Jerry, if they pan out it was Garrett and the scouting department.
Doomsday101;5071074 said:I guess the ansewer will take a year or 2 to know. If these guys fail then it was Jerry, if they pan out it was Garrett and the scouting department.
Well, if what Jerry said is true, about the first three picks all being in the low 20's on their draft board, then the Scouts have some or all the blame for the board. Now as the draft played out Jerry and Stephen ran the whole show and very seldom spoke with Jason or that tobacco chewing Head Scout Tom. It was evident that they reveled in being front and center and it was their biggest moment of the year to shine. Again, they made fools of themselves and insured the team would again be mediocre this year.GimmeTheBall!;5071022 said:In my mind, it seemed to be a Jerra-Stephen draft: You know, two "football guys" pulling a fast one by getting the O lineman (Frederick the Giant) no team could live without. Then the Jones braintrust goes for a so-so TE that did not address other critical needs. Then, a WR when, again, there is no critical need for one (albeit China Doll Austin probably does need a backup). Then came the later rounds with marginal athletes that even the experts will not vouch for, so Jerra-Stepha cannot be blamed for these later picks.
Really, did Jason Garrett even have a say in these proceedings?
Who knows, this draft might well be the best in our history (yeah, and Al Davis will come back from heaven and buy a team in Farmers Branch: The Fighting Idiots from Farmers Branch).
Or it could be another mediocre draft with the 'Boys ending up with 1 serviceable player (probably the TE). But most possibly this will rank with the worst.
Mens, my question to you, the unwashed but loyal, energy-drink drinking mens, was this a Jerra draft? Was this a Jerra-Stephen draft or was this a Jason Garrett draft.
Please, do not give me the This was a Scouts draft because Jerra pulls the trigger on drafts.
Methinks the middle option, with father and son being "football guys" and drafting for respect (theirs) and to show the rest of the free world that their aesthetic sense of talent and athleticism is better than the "experts"?
Our draft: Not having seen the lads in action, a solid C.
I weep for the future.
Gameover;5071088 said:Cowboys haven't averaged 25 per game since the 2007 season, getting Romo some weapons is a need.
ninja;5071089 said:The same people who are responsible for the last 3 drafts (2010-2012 which have been pretty good) and the 2009 debacle.
Look, you win some and you lose some. Get over it. The Cowboys seem to have got some good players in the 2013 draft. As Parcells rightfully said when evaluating, "separate the player from where he was drafted." We'll find out soon enough whether these players can play.
Your attempt to grade this draft is an exercise in futility. Not only don't you know what you are grading, you don't have a clue as to what criteria to use.
Only a fool would grade the draft on need right now. Unless you know what the team needs at the beginning of Sept and the beginning of Dec.
CopenhagenCowboy;5071117 said:Frederick, Escobar, Williams and Randle will be better value on their rookie deals than Claiborne, Crawford, Wilber and Johnson.
TINGS21;5071180 said:I would say are lack of scoring has to do with our inability to run block bc of our "maulers" we have on the line. Are Redzone scoring has not been pretty the last few years and i think a lot has to do with our running game not who Tony has to throw to.
Teague31;5071066 said:Nfl.com gave us the highest rating in the league
DenCWBY;5071159 said:Yes the answer will be in a couple of years so we're all speculating. The blame or credit will be either JJ or JG or both if the team is successful. They have put themselves in that situation and JJ will apparently leave the chips all on the table either way (with his hands on the team). You do have to consider the pattern of any organization that fails year after year and disect the only consistent part of it which is usually the problem. This draft may make the team and may improve the team itself. However if the team is still 8-8 or loses their first playoff game again this year, I doubt that anyone (but a few) will feel any better about this draft or our future.
JJ is fighting an uphill battle and each year the hill gets a little steeper or in his words "the window is shutting". It's going to get harder for him to get credit as the pressure mounts for a championship unless he backs off and out of the organization to let the coaches and staff (football minds) run the business.
Sadly I truly feel that JJ does not have a clue and worse (after this draft) I question his son's football acumen. Not because these players (they picked) will be failures, but because (JJ and Son) aren't smart football people.
Parcells4Life;5071063 said:So having the #1 ranked Center which we badly needed, the top rated pass catching TE, and the #1 receiver in the NCAA is a bad draft?!
Not to mention a DeMarco Murray clone so we don't have a drop off when/if he goes down and a linebacker that had 7 INTs in the SEC!
If that's a terrible draft to you, what would have been good picks?
The only player I really wanted was Warford in the 2nd round but I trust Callahan to know that his offense can use Escobar and actually live up to the potential.
Doomsday101;5071074 said:I guess the ansewer will take a year or 2 to know. If these guys fail then it was Jerry, if they pan out it was Garrett and the scouting department.
This. Especially the last few years.Future;5071260 said:I think anyone who fails to see the value in this draft is just butthurt because they spent all their time watching Youtube videos of lineman and making mocks that had us taking 3 of them.
The fan expectation, at least around here, and what the Cowboys wanted to accomplish were obviously not in the same ball park.