zeromaster
New Member
- Messages
- 2,575
- Reaction score
- 0
Leave the Latin to the lawyers and archaeologists. It's so much safer that way.
zeromaster;1659592 said:Leave the Latin to the lawyers and archaeologists. It's so much safer that way.
GimmeTheBall!;1658781 said:I don't git it.
Yes, TNew is needed.
But better to keep him out longer -- one or even two games -- and ensure his recovery than to rush him in and chance a longterm injury.
Chicago has crafty receivers, but isn't its offense 30th in passing?
Conversely, and ipso facto contendo, ours is that bad in pass defense.
Whatever, men.
Don't rush TNew back sooner than absolutely necessary.
GimmeTheBall!;1659580 said:A "strawberry statement" if I ever saw one.
Try again. Maybe the second time you could actually say something, though I ain't holding mah breath, brutha.
eduncan22;1658980 said:He should have surgery and have it fixed.
If he's ready why wait?GimmeTheBall!;1658781 said:I don't git it.
Yes, TNew is needed.
But better to keep him out longer -- one or even two games -- and ensure his recovery than to rush him in and chance a longterm injury.
Chicago has crafty receivers, but isn't its offense 30th in passing?
Conversely, and ipso facto contendo, ours is that bad in pass defense.
Whatever, men.
Don't rush TNew back sooner than absolutely necessary.
big dog cowboy;1658943 said:I've heard that also. At this pojnt, I'm more concerned with him being 100% in January rather than September.
abersonc;1659844 said:Would you have preferred this?
50,000 watts of truth, logic and comfort all point toward Newman's imminent return.
lzppjb;1658844 said:Newman looked pretty good on TV last Sunday when he ran out onto the field after and INT and jumped on a player. Looked to have a lot of spring in his step.