So, why the rush to get Tnew for Sunday?

Leave the Latin to the lawyers and archaeologists. It's so much safer that way. ;)
 
zeromaster;1659592 said:
Leave the Latin to the lawyers and archaeologists. It's so much safer that way. ;)

Archaeologists don't use latin, btw. You must have meant botanists or physicians.:)
 
Bears are a team that likes to throw it deep

we are a team that gets beat deep


so therefore we want our best CB on the field, in hopes to curtail the deep passes
 
I think this will be his decision. And you could about bet that this particular game is circled on his calender as it is with the other players. It's a big game and I can't wait!!
 
After the Glenn fiasco, they don't dare rush him. Nor are we 0-2 and desperate for a W. If he plays, it's because he legitimately feels good.
 
GimmeTheBall!;1658781 said:
I don't git it.

Yes, TNew is needed.
But better to keep him out longer -- one or even two games -- and ensure his recovery than to rush him in and chance a longterm injury.

Chicago has crafty receivers, but isn't its offense 30th in passing?
Conversely, and ipso facto contendo, ours is that bad in pass defense.

Whatever, men.

Don't rush TNew back sooner than absolutely necessary.


:star:


You're such a coward... I can't believe they let you wear a uniform...
 
GimmeTheBall!;1659580 said:
A "strawberry statement" if I ever saw one.

Try again. Maybe the second time you could actually say something, though I ain't holding mah breath, brutha.

Would you have preferred this?

50,000 watts of truth, logic and comfort all point toward Newman's imminent return.
 
eduncan22;1658980 said:
He should have surgery and have it fixed.

Why? so more teams would throw at Henry and you have more reasons for your agenda if he gives up a 15 yard pass?
 
and Bernard Berrian is pretty good. Muhammed is the ideal matchup for Henry, but I think we need Newman for Berrian
 
GimmeTheBall!;1658781 said:
I don't git it.

Yes, TNew is needed.
But better to keep him out longer -- one or even two games -- and ensure his recovery than to rush him in and chance a longterm injury.

Chicago has crafty receivers, but isn't its offense 30th in passing?
Conversely, and ipso facto contendo, ours is that bad in pass defense.

Whatever, men.

Don't rush TNew back sooner than absolutely necessary.


:star:
If he's ready why wait?
Playing on a grass field would be easier than coming back on the Texas Stadium surface.
 
big dog cowboy;1658943 said:
I've heard that also. At this pojnt, I'm more concerned with him being 100% in January rather than September.

It may become a moot point if he doesn't start playing soon. This defense needs him back as soon as possible.
 
abersonc;1659844 said:
Would you have preferred this?

50,000 watts of truth, logic and comfort all point toward Newman's imminent return.

Um, yes
Thanks for the inside tip.
 
Biggest reason...

We're one bad play away from having Jacque Reeves and Nate Jones on the field in our base defense.

Wade is supposed to be the pressure guy but I'm not blown away by the sack totals just yet.
 
I do not know much about the injury but if he plays is the fear he will tear it more or just irritate it more.
 
lzppjb;1658844 said:
Newman looked pretty good on TV last Sunday when he ran out onto the field after and INT and jumped on a player. Looked to have a lot of spring in his step.


I can't belive nobody else has brought this up.I saw that also but forgot to post about it after the game.When I saw it I was like was that T-New:eek: .He looks ready to me .
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,576
Messages
13,819,696
Members
23,780
Latest member
HoppleSopple
Back
Top