Solidifying Depth?

STAR GAZER

Benched
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
0
Are we attempting to solidify our depth by weeding out the various weaknesses at the bottom of our roster? Quantity with moderate talent could do that if we have a larger group of prospects in camp.

Since this was considered a more consistent spread of potential in the 3rd and fourth rounds, I am suspecting so.
 

Monster Heel

Benched
Messages
1,923
Reaction score
0
This is the exact same kind of strategy that eroded the Cowboys in the mid 90s until they completely imploded in 2000. Pick good players, not "depth".
 

STAR GAZER

Benched
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
0
Another thought would be we are collecting a quantity of picks to make trades for proven talent.

I'm not getting it. :confused:
 

CowboyJeff

New Member
Messages
1,906
Reaction score
0
Monster Heel;2746503 said:
This is the exact same kind of strategy that eroded the Cowboys in the mid 90s until they completely imploded in 2000. Pick good players, not "depth".

:hammer:

We can thank Larry Lacewell for that. Oh wait.....he's back. ;)
 

Cowboys22

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,507
Reaction score
11,384
STAR GAZER;2746490 said:
Are we attempting to solidify our depth by weeding out the various weaknesses at the bottom of our roster? Quantity with moderate talent could do that if we have a larger group of prospects in camp.

Since this was considered a more consistent spread of potential in the 3rd and fourth rounds, I am suspecting so.

So now the value is in the 3rd and 4th rounds? Before the draft started it was in the 2nd-5th rounds. I don't like the trade. They lost over 100 points on the trade chart and there were good value players available at positions of need.
 

Texan_Eph89

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
61
We can't keep 12 rookies.
That's the problem.
It's all fun and dandy until we drop 5 and other teams pick them up....
 

wileedog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,356
Reaction score
2,393
We're stacking up guys to put in Irvin reality tv shows.
 

Texan_Eph89

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
61
I just don't get it. I thought we were going into it as Best Player Available...
Not today apparently....

Fellas, Jerry Jones is not Jimmy Johnson. I wish we could say this was a Jimmy move, but this is a 1995-2000s Jerry move.
 

STAR GAZER

Benched
Messages
2,047
Reaction score
0
Texan_Eph89;2746588 said:
I just don't get it. I thought we were going into it as Best Player Available...
Not today apparently....

Fellas, Jerry Jones is not Jimmy Johnson. I wish we could say this was a Jimmy move, but this is a 1995-2000s Jerry move.

I really felt strongly we would package those picks and move up for higher talent. I guess that's why I am surprised.
 
Top