Someone Explain?

[The30YardSlant]

Is this a non sequitur or did I miss something?

It's a last ditch, grasping at straws attempt to justify Bledsoe's "ability"

 

[Hostile]

It's a last ditch, grasping at straws attempt to justify Bledsoe's "ability"

See, you can figure it out after someone points out the obvious to you. Now you just need to work on admitting when you speak out of turn.

 

[Sarge]

It's a last ditch, grasping at straws attempt to justify Bledsoe's "ability"

Really, zzzzzzzz already. C'mon.

 

[The30YardSlant]

I never denied that. Look at my very first post in the thread on page 1. I mocked that.

I didn't however, label him something he wasn't and then lack the sack to take it back.

You got proven wrong. Period. Don't try and deny it. Look how fast you began looking up his posts trying to find evidence to say I owed you $1000.00 or to make me look bad.

What did you find as it pertained to my challenge? That you stuck your foot in your mouth. If my being right is nitpicking, then you trying to dance around what I called you on is spin control.

Try not to throw up from being so dizzy huh?

I worded it poorly, I should have included "Bledsoe" along with Henson from the start. Jesus Christ man. I didnt try and backpedal by looking up anything. As soon as I read the post I recalled several other times he has bashed Romo senselessly. I looked back to find said posts. It was a generalization gone awry because you like nitpicking and because I didnt include Bledsoe along with Henson in said generalization. Had I, we wouldnt be talkign about this.

Good grief.....

 

[The30YardSlant]

See, you can figure it out after someone points out the obvious to you. Now you just need to work on admitting when you speak out of turn.

Do you simply relish picking out the tiniest missteps in my posts, or this a thing in every aspect of your life? This cinversion is only occuring because of the inclusion of the word "Bledsoe" from the original post. I should have included it, and didnt. Get over it, it's not worth it.

 

[Hostile]

I worded it poorly, I should have included "Bledsoe" along with Henson from the start. Jesus Christ man. I didnt try and backpedal by looking up anything. As soon as I read the post I recalled several other times he has bashed Romo senselessly. I looked back to find said posts. It was a generalization gone awry because you like nitpicking and because I didnt include Bledsoe along with Henson in said generalization. Had I, we wouldnt be talkign about this.

Good grief.....

No, that was an attempt to shut me up. When you couldn't you tried to backpedal instead of just admitting you made a poor generalization and missed the boat.

Bad judgment all the way around don't you think?

 

[Hostile]

Do you simply relish picking out the tiniest missteps in my posts, or this a thing in every aspect of your life? This cinversion is only occuring because of the inclusion of the word "Bledsoe" from the original post. I should have included it, and didnt. Get over it, it's not worth it.

Spin, spin, spin....

 

[The30YardSlant]

No, that was an attempt to shut me up. When you couldn't you tried to backpedal instead of just admitting you made a poor generalization and missed the boat.

Bad judgment all the way around don't you think?

No, it really wasnt, but go on thinking it was, it is irrelavent in the grand scheme of the arguement.

You just like nitpicking at my posts. Here you do it again, ignoring the substance and taking out the lines that you feel you can argue against. It's silly, obsessive, and really not worth the time and effort.

 

[Hostile]

No, it really wasnt, but go on thinking it was, it is irrelavent in the grand scheme of the arguement.

You just like nitpicking at my posts. Here you do it again, ignoring the substance and taking out the lines that you feel you can argue against. It's silly, obsessive, and really not worth the time and effort.

I think it is.

In the post where I challenged you, I gave you an out and you didn't take it. Instead you tried to spin it to show you were "essentially" right.



That's nitpicking at its finest right?

 

[The30YardSlant]

Spin, spin, spin....

Are you honestly going to tell that I said "Bledsoe and Henson jock riders continue to bash Romo" we'd be sitting here right now? Of course not, because your whole basis is that I labeled him a Henson supporter as opposed to the Bledsoe jock rider he is. Looking back, yes, I should have included Bledsoe in it, because he isnt the only one.

 

[The30YardSlant]

I think it is.

In the post where I challenged you, I gave you an out and you didn't take it. Instead you tried to spin it to show you were "essentially" right.



That's nitpicking at its finest right?

When you base an entire arguement solely off of the exclusion of one name from one post, yes, that is nitpicking.

You just like arguing for the sake of arguing me thinks.

 

[Hostile]

Are you honestly going to tell that I said "Bledsoe and Henson jock riders continue to bash Romo" we'd be sitting here right now? Of course not, because your whole basis is that I labeled him a Henson supporter as opposed to the Bledsoe jock rider he is. Looking back, yes, I should have included Bledsoe in it, because he isnt the only one.

I doubt we would be sitting here right now. Maybe next time I call you on somethign and leave you an out you'll take it.

Blame the guy in your mirror. I said I would make you look foolish if you tried to defend what you posted. I'm a man of my word.

 

[Hostile]

When you base an entire arguement solely off of the exclusion of one name from one post, yes, that is nitpicking.

You just like arguing for the sake of arguing me thinks.

Methinks you like throwing up, so that's why you try and spin your way out of stuff instead of simply admitting you made a rash generalization.

Spin, spin, spin...

 

[The30YardSlant]

I doubt we would be sitting here right now.

There it is, I knew you could bring yourself to do it

 

[The30YardSlant]

Methinks you like throwing up, so that's why you try and spin your way out of stuff instead of simply admitting you made a rash generalization.

Spin, spin, spin...

It weasnt rash because it's true. Bledsoe and Henson supporters are, for the most part, hesitant to hop on the Romowagon because it hurts their ego.

 

[Hostile]

It weasnt rash because it's true. Bledsoe and Henson supporters are, for the most part, hesitant to hop on the Romowagon because it hurts their ego.

Incorrect. Bledsoe supporters who arrived here as Bledsoe supporters are. The Henson crowd for the most part are firmly behind Romo and have moved on (unlike you).

Nice try though.

 

[The30YardSlant]

Incorrect. Bledsoe supporters who arrived here as Bledsoe supporters are. The Henson crowd for the most part are firmly behind Romo and have moved on (unlike you).

Nice try though.

I never liked Henson after that "start" against Chicago, so your's is a moot point. I was called an idiot for so long for sayign Henson wouldnt amount to anything in this league, you think I'm not going to remind people of that when given the chance? HA!

 

[Hostile]

I never liked Henson after that "start" against Chicago, so your's is a moot point. I was called an idiot for so long for sayign Henson wouldnt amount to anything in this league, you think I'm not going to remind people of that when given the chance? HA!

Thank you. You just proved my point.

 

[The30YardSlant]

Thank you. You just proved my point.

If reminding people who bashed you how wrong they were is a crime, hey, I'll serve my time. The crow I've served up is well worth it.

 

[Hostile]

If reminding people who bashed you how wrong they were is a crime, hey, I'll serve my time. The crow I've served up is well worth it.

You didn't serve any up HH. He never bashed you for this. I proved it.

You went hunting for the Boogie Man and he was a figment of your imagination.

Too bad, so sad, all you ended up doing was admitting you have a petty agenda. Awwwwwwwwwwwww.