jobberone;2336466 said:It's distal Eskimo. So not a boxer's fracture. Either pulled the MCL with concomitant fracture or a guillotine fracture just proximal to the end of the metacarpal would be my best guess. They won't worry if there is a little translation of the head of the 5th MC although sounds very minor with absolutely no displacement. Not a hand surgeon either.
Eskimo;2336635 said:I think we can deduce a few things.
Firstly, not an intra-articular fracture because those required immediate surgery.
Secondly, not a base of the metacarpal fracture because those also require surgery.
Thus we are left with the metacarpal neck (boxer's fracture) of metacarpal shaft. Since it is undisplaced and no angulation, we know non-operative managaement is most appropriate here and recovery should be complete. In summary, Romo should be just fine in the long run.
The exact nature of the fracture and associated soft tissue injury impossible to speculate on without direct examination/MRI.
I've just treated a number of the boxer's in emergency and they hurt like a son of a gun and those guys know there is something wrong with their hand right away. Whereas, for some of the metacarpal shaft fractures I've seen, they can go undetected for awhile even though they do hurt. That's why I think Romo has the shaft fracture.
jobberone;2336718 said:It's definitely not intra-articular. And it's hard to tear the bone off with a MCL tear but you would get a "non-displaced" fracture. Most likely a linear non-displaced transverse guillotine fx distal to a mid-shaft fracture and proximal to the head of the MC. That'd be my guess. And those hurt immediately.
A boxer's fracture is something that would require a pin and unlikely to be non-displaced.
The hand surgeon said it was a more distal fracture than a mid-shaft one of which there are about five types...don't quote me as that's memory....including a Boxer's.
poke;2336771 said:does this mean he cant just " rub a lil dirt on it boy " ?
if so he better be glad he didnt play at my old high school.
Eskimo;2336755 said:I think you're likely correct although I know we treat many boxer's fractures non-surgically up here although there is a residual deformity - I don't know if a QB would require a more precise anatomical reduction at that joint. I think the big issue would be ability to squeeze the football with enough strength as fine motor shouldn't be much of an issue with such an injury.
sonnyboy;2336782 said:Great info people, from what I'm reading, it looks like almost a certainty he'll be 100% for Washington in 5 weeks. But here's the million dollar question..........
Just how likely is it Romo plays in 3 weeks at NYG:
1) Likely
2) 50/50
3) Doubtful
4) No Chance
that's my opinionRampage;2336273 said:I have a feeling he will return for the giant game.
Hailmary;2336611 said:What's that thing TO uses? A hyperbaric chamber? Would that help him heal faster? Maybe they can fashion one just for his hand, like the one in Zoolander? :laugh2:
Ok never mine he posted lolCrazyCowboy;2336265 said:do we have any dr's on this board?
ConcordCowboy;2336838 said:This is VERY close to what Romo's hand X-Ray would look like.
I've taken a few in my life.
:
Hypnotoad;2337091 said:ESPN was inferring that Romo is soft for not playing through this.
Talking about how many times Brett probably would have played through this injury. Talking about the one time where Bledsoe played through a similar injury.
Eskimo;2337095 said:They don't know what they are talking about, IMO. A QB cannot play with this injury to his throwing hand.