Sportline Clark Judge Mock Draft...Laron Landry @ #22

carphalen5150;1423790 said:
It's OK to admit when you are wrong.

He'd have like 25,000 posts by now if he did that. Please don't encourage him.
 
Bob Sacamano;1423792 said:
I wasn't wrong

you show me a piece where the Rams are going to bigger receivers, again, their top 3 receivers are still going to include Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce as 2 of them

Ahh look Summer is back in fantasy land surprise surprise. Ever looked to see how old Bruce was and who there OC is cause its not Martz and its >35.

Oh and Drew Bennet says hello.
 
FuzzyLumpkins;1423933 said:
Ahh look Summer is back in fantasy land surprise surprise. Ever looked to see how old Bruce was and who there OC is cause its not Martz and its >35.

Oh and Drew Bennet says hello.

Torry Holt, #1 receiver, says hello back

but my God, St. Louis passing on the defender of Landry's ilk is what I want people to talk about
 
Bob Sacamano;1423940 said:
ok Mr., "he writes a blog, so therefore he's a hack"

Hacks are like you, Summer. Every so often they get something right. But becuase they are wrong so often, you have to approach them with considerable skepticism.
 
Bob Sacamano;1424008 said:
at least when I'm wrong, I don't turn it into 10 pages

That's because you run from the thread when you are wrong.
 
Bob Sacamano;1424013 said:
wah wah wah

I love people who don't debate a topic

says the guy who averages about 4 words per post.....
 
Mmm.. I'm sure Cowboy nation would s*** a collective brick should Landry fall to us.
 
abersonc;1423700 said:
I promise to wet myself if that happens on draft day


you and me both:laugh2: but someone drops every year so we shall see...lol..
 
Bob Sacamano;1423942 said:
Torry Holt, #1 receiver, says hello back

but my God, St. Louis passing on the defender of Landry's ilk is what I want people to talk about

Oh that makes a lot of sense. :rolleyes:

He s their number 1 receiver no doubt but the fact that they signed Bennett should indicate to anyone with a modicum of sense that they are going towards a more balanced passing attack. Thus s possesion receiver in the draft makes sense but as per usual any indication that we might have the oppurtunity to draft a RB or S on day 1 just means summer sticks his head farther and farther into the sand.
 
I'd nut myself if we got Landry

Or conversely, I'd drive up to Valley Ranch and show Jerruh's insides what a size 12 steel-toed boot looks like if he fell to us and we didnt pick him
 
FuzzyLumpkins;1424222 said:
Oh that makes a lot of sense. :rolleyes:

He s their number 1 receiver no doubt but the fact that they signed Bennett should indicate to anyone with a modicum of sense that they are going towards a more balanced passing attack. Thus s possesion receiver in the draft makes sense but as per usual any indication that we might have the oppurtunity to draft a RB or S on day 1 just means summer sticks his head farther and farther into the sand.

I don't know what this has to do w/ me not wanting a S and RB on the 1st day, many people believe Landry is a top 10 pick, I just don't see St. Louis sacrificing the chance to draft an impact player for their D, for a possession receiver
 
Bob Sacamano;1424252 said:
I don't know what this has to do w/ me not wanting a S and RB on the 1st day, many people believe Landry is a top 10 pick, I just don't see St. Louis sacrificing the chance to draft an impact player for their D, for a possession receiver

Sometimes i wonder if you are truly feigning density or if it is real.

In any situation where a safety or RB prospect is proposed to fall to us you do your best to shoot it down. Its a trend.

You dont even use correct logic. What would have made sense is that with Holt, Bruce and Bennet under contract they dont need another receiver.

Regardless I still would see you being mad if Landry did fall to us and we picked him up.
 
FuzzyLumpkins;1424314 said:
Sometimes i wonder if you are truly feigning density or if it is real.

In any situation where a safety or RB prospect is proposed to fall to us you do your best to shoot it down. Its a trend.

You dont even use correct logic. What would have made sense is that with Holt, Bruce and Bennet under contract they dont need another receiver.

Regardless I still would see you being mad if Landry did fall to us and we picked him up.

I wouldn't be mad at all if a top 10 pick fell to us at 22, not at all, I just don't see Landry dropping all the way to 22 when Donte Whitner, a lesser prospect, went #8 or #9 overall last year, Landry can do so much, he can patrol CF, and he can cover the slot receiver, a perfect pick for St. Louis

but can I have a preference for who I want to take in the 1st? please, can I? good Gawd

btw, I don't think Landry gets past San Fran or Atlanta
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,453
Messages
13,875,792
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top