OmerV
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,928
- Reaction score
- 22,452
Again the idea that QBs routinely carry their team on their backs is overstated, but aside from that, most QBs don't win on their rookie deal, yet teams retain them as long as they are a high level QB. It's not just the Tom Brady, Pat Mahomes level QBs that have huge success right away that get a second contract.QBs that carry their team should be paid even though they struggle themselves to ever win again because most of them do it on rookie deals.
Paying a guy like Dak? You don’t even have the championship to show for his rookie deal and you’re going to stack the odds even higher against the team.
The QB market has become the market of stupidity and the NFL has so many young talented QBs on rookie deals and Vets taking paycuts to win titles that paying Dak puts us at a serious disadvantage.
On top of that a lot of you don’t want to tank and possibly at the least have an option for more cheap quality players.
But Jerry will do it that way and we will stack the years of no championships or real playoff success up over and over and over.
The Dallas Cowboys are stuck in the middle and nobody wants to do anything to stop that from happening.
Ultimately it's about a team allocating it's resources the best way it can, and yes, paying Dak could limit the money to spread around on free agents, but it also reduces the draft capital that can be spent on other positions because it forces the team to go all in on a QB, and of course, college players still have to prove themselves at the pro level.
Isn't it possible the team could pay Dak, and instead of building defense with high priced free agents do so by maximizing the value of the top 10 (maybe top 5) draft pick the team will have. They could potentially trade back and have a couple of first round picks and some added picks later in the draft.
Maybe that wouldn't be better, but maybe it would. The point is there isn't just one way to think about it.
Last edited: