Fizziksman
BanditHiro
- Messages
- 5,129
- Reaction score
- 3,526
i think the problem is that you are trying to throw a guy open when the guy isn't capable of getting open. it was a bad decision to test Gilmore with that type of route
Totally disagree. Why do you even throw that pass? Even if Gilmore didn’t interfere with Gallup he had position. That’s on the QB IMO. Not a horrible throw as much as a poor decision to throw it. It was a best a 50/50 ballThat has to be totally on Gallup . As a receiver you have to stay upright in order to catch the ball and in a storied career in NE now Indy Gilmore probably has not had an easier interception.
You could tell from Daks body language after the play it was three letters the first one is W I’ll leave the guessing as to the other 2.
When Cooper was here it was almost like you had to force the ball early into his hands keep him involved , interested . With 88 13 and Noah Brown it’s whoever is open distribute the passes then you have the three horsemen at TE . I’m liking this late season passing game .
Dak shouldn't have thrown that ball. Go somewhere else. Run for a couple of yards. Anything besides force it into a situation like he did.
And Gallup is 6’1” 198 Gilmore is 6’0” 190 so he should’ve owned that route but it looks like he gave up on the break.
I’m hoping Gallup will not make the same mistake again. I’m sure the coaches made him aware.I really am not a Collinswoth fan but the man ran a few routes went to a Bengal SB I’ll defer to him on this one . “ the receiver has to fight his way through that “ ….and depending on the refs to “ throw flags “. Ummm no .
I’m hoping Gallup will not make the same mistake again. I’m sure the coaches made him aware.
Dak shouldn't have thrown that ball. Go somewhere else. Run for a couple of yards. Anything besides force it into a situation like he did.
Not extending his arms probably helped Gilmore avoid the penalty. I said two-hand shove, but he really kept his arms in and kind of rammed him with his upper body to cut off the route. He still clearly made illegal contact with the receiver.
Not even close to Illegal contact. Here are the rules:
ARTICLE 3. ILLEGAL CONTACT BEYOND FIVE-YARD ZONE. Beyond the five-yard zone, if the player who receives the snap
remains in the pocket with the ball, a defender cannot initiate contact with a receiver who is attempting to evade him. A defender
may use his hands or arms only to defend or protect himself against impending contact caused by a receiver.
When Gallup turns his route right into Gilmore, he has the right to protect himself against impending contact per the wording of the rule. He didn't push Gallup down. Gallup went down from what looked like not being prepared for Gilmore to hold his ground like Collinsworth said. Not illegal contact or PI in any way. Gilmore has as much right to the thrown ball as Gallup and can position himself as such, especially if you're going to try to run a route through him.
Don't agree. Gilmore did not use his hands and arms only to defend himself. He used them to initiate contact. He moved into the receiver. Illegal contact is not called if you establish a position and the receiver runs into you, even if you use your arms to protect yourself.
There was a similar play earlier this season where one of our DBs was penalized. He established position and the receiver turned upfield and ran into him. It was called because the defender initiated the contact even though he was holding his ground.
In both cases, the receiver wasn't given the opportunity to evade the defender because the defender struck them. Gallup actually tried to cut back in front of Gilmore, but Gilmore thrust himself into Gallup to cut him off. Thus, it is illegal contact.