I doubt any team would break the bank for the 43 year old brady. I thought it was a ridiculous assertion when I first heard it. Perhaps someone was just trying to make Michael look foolish.
If the "break the bank" part of the Brady equation is true, yeah, it doesn't make sense to sign Brady. We're assuming he forced his way to the open market to get paid stupid money that the Patriots know better than to pay him at this point. If so, I'd want no part of that. Not many teams should want any part of that because it just doesn't make sense.
It could make sense for teams like the Chargers or Raiders, doing it purely for marketing purposes in a city that has yet to devote itself to them. It could even make a certain amount of sense for a team that wants to make unpopular moves to shed unwise long-term contracts and commence a massive rebuilding effort, but adding the big shiny Tom Brady name pacifies and distracts the fans or local media from giving them too hard a time about it.
It makes not much sense for teams doing it for actual football reasons, though.
For three straight years, he's been worse than he was the previous season. His completion percentage and his yards per attempt are down, both -- which is so much worse than one of them being good at the expense of the other. And he's gonna be 43. And he's gonna be in a totally new environment and offense. And he's gonna be in an organization without Belichick's discipline or good decision-making.
He's trending down and it's likely to only get ugly.
Only suckers will be in line to get caught holding the bag, I think.