Stephen says we could keep more than 5-6 WRs

[Hawkeye0202]

 

[Jipper]

Is that bc there are more that should be kept or so many injuries in other spots that they can go long thefe

 

[Hawkeye0202]

Is that bc there are more that should be kept or so many injuries in other spots that they can go long thefe

I'm guessing they really like this group, not wanting to take a chance sneaking the 6th or 7th player to PS

 

[gmoney112]

Lenoir making his case

 

[Broges74]

Interesting comments. Perhaps hinting at a trade?

If we're keeping 6-7 WR, where are we getting the roster spot from? Also, perhaps the ET trade is not dead yet?

 

[Jipper]

Interesting comments. Perhaps hinting at a trade?

If we're keeping 6-7 WR, where are we getting the roster spot from? Also, perhaps the ET trade is not dead yet?

Are you speculating that we would trade a pick and a wr to seattly for et?

 

[Aviano90]

We need to trade Hurns to JVille due to the Lee injury they just had.

 

[JW82]

Lenoir making his case

Based on play time and everything I’ve read, I think he is in that 6th guy already and Thompson or Brown are that potential 7th guy.

 

[Techsass]

"A little thin at safety" means we might need more chunk plays to catch back up, I guess.

 

[Sydla]

I wonder if part of this is because Thompson is the 7th WR and they don’t want to admit their mistake in signing him.

 

[ItzKelz]

We need to trade Hurns to JVille due to the Lee injury they just had.

Why do we care about Jacksonvilles problems?

 

[Aviano90]

Why do we care about Jacksonvilles problems?

Why do you think "we care about Jacksonville problems"?

Maybe we can take advantage of their need and flip Hurns for a draft pick.

 

[ItzKelz]

Why do you think "we care about Jacksonville problems"?

Maybe we can take advantage of their need and flip Hurns for a draft pick.

We need Hurns

 

[Aviano90]

We need Hurns

We don't "need" him. LOL We're not a Hurns aways from the SB.

 

[ItzKelz]

We don't "need" him. LOL We're not a Hurns aways from the SB.

What am I thinking? We signed him a few months ago because we didn't need him.

 

[Cowboys22]

This is simply posturing for some trade talks. A few WRs have gone down and Stephen wants teams to come calling. They don’t want teams thinking they can wait until Dallas cuts Thompson or Lenoir. They may keep 7 WRs initially so they can trade one right after the deadline. They always make a move or two in the 24 hours after final cutdown.

 

[Aviano90]

What am I thinking? We signed him a few months ago because we didn't need him.

LOL. Yeah, what was I think possibly thinking the Cowboys could benefit from a situation. We'll keep a ton of mediocre receivers afraid to let one go, Hurns apparently being one of those mediocre receivers we just NEED. Have no shot this year if Hurns isn't here. Hope he doesn't get hurt or the season is definitely over.

 

[ItzKelz]

LOL. Yeah, what was I think possibly thinking the Cowboys could benefit from a situation. We'll keep a ton of mediocre receivers afraid to let one go, Hurns apparently being one of those mediocre receivers we just NEED. Have no shot this year if Hurns isn't here. Hope he doesn't get hurt or the season is definitely over.

I say trade LVE. We just got him a few months ago. I'm sure someone has a hurt LB.

 

[Aviano90]

I say trade LVE. We just got him a few months ago. I'm sure someone has a hurt LB.

If we can get him for Derwin James, let's do it. Just as long as we don't let that Allen Hurns go. He is the key to a championship this year. We need that guy or else have no shot whatsoever. You've opened my eyes the importance of Hurns.

 

[Pants]

I love the "We're not ____________ away from the SB" schtick....we just signed Hurns, it would SHOCK me to see him get moved and yes, they need him in our current state of affairs @ WR...the irony is that the poster is saying to trade Hurns to Jax, for what? please...guys that will get significant playing time (i.e.: Hurns, et al) are needed...flip any of 5 thru 7? sure, not one through 4 (and before someone says "but Hurns isn't a #1", ugh, I have said repeatedly, we don't have a true #1, we have a bunch of #2/3 types and that might just work to our advantage)