Steve Breaston next year?

MarionBarberThe4th

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,413
Reaction score
5,389
Hes due a raise, and I dont think the Cards can pay him

Hes a great 3 or nice 2 depending on if we dump Crayton to make room

Just waiting Adams verification....
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
Why on earth would be dump Crayton?

And the "I don't think team X can pay someone" argument never pans out
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
AbeBeta;2891938 said:
Why on earth would be dump Crayton?

And the "I don't think team X can pay someone" argument never pans out
Because he is Jewish? :lmao2:
 

FCBarca

New Member
Messages
2,475
Reaction score
0
I never liked the fact that Dallas skipped over him as he went so late in the draft, tbh...He was an electric player at UofM
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
FCBarca;2891962 said:
I never liked the fact that Dallas skipped over him as he went so late in the draft, tbh...He was an electric player at UofM

I wanted Dallas to draft him to potentially return punts

I didn't think he'd turn out this well as a receiver though
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
MarionBarberThe4th;2891945 said:
Did w/ RW11

They certainly could have payed him... they didn't WANT to pay him. They saw an opportunity to move him for some serious picks - had they not he would have been franchised the second he was eligible for UFA.
 

MarionBarberThe4th

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,413
Reaction score
5,389
AbeBeta;2891998 said:
They certainly could have payed him... they didn't WANT to pay him. They saw an opportunity to move him for some serious picks - had they not he would have been franchised the second he was eligible for UFA.


Nah, it would have been too much $ @ WR considering Calvin Johnson is better
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,684
Reaction score
12,393
MarionBarberThe4th;2892030 said:
Nah, it would have been too much $ @ WR considering Calvin Johnson is better

Right. So they would have just let him walk.

Sure. That would have happened.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Have the Cardinals solved their Boldin situation? Doesn't he become a FA after this season. If so, that leaves Arizona some room to re-sign Breaston.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
I fail to see how we would be any better off letting Crayton go and signing Breaston. Wouldn't we be in essentially the exact same position?
 

MarionBarberThe4th

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,413
Reaction score
5,389
texbumthelife;2892120 said:
I fail to see how we would be any better off letting Crayton go and signing Breaston. Wouldn't we be in essentially the exact same position?

Speed. Craytons another chains mover.

If we had Breaston would you trade him for Crayton?
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
texbumthelife;2892120 said:
I fail to see how we would be any better off letting Crayton go and signing Breaston. Wouldn't we be in essentially the exact same position?

Similar, but not exactly the same. Both are better #3 receivers than they are #2 receivers. I think Crayton accepts that at this point in his career. Has Breaston? Will he want #2 money or even #1 money next season? We really don't know that much about Breaston. He had a very good year last year in the Cardinals wide open system. He did nothing as a receiver his rookie year. Can he repeat what he did last year? We know exactly what Crayton is.

Breaston is younger, so that can make a difference. Crayton will be 31 in 2010 and Breaston will be 27. Crayton is not dynamic, but he is a steady punt returner. Breaston is more explosive.

There will be trade offs. It will come down to money.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
My point being, we would still have a glut of possession WR's and receivers with potential.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,738
Reaction score
23,273
MarionBarberThe4th;2892144 said:
Speed. Craytons another chains mover.

If we had Breaston would you trade him for Crayton?

No, and I wouldn't trade Crayton for Breaston either. Too me they are the same type of receiver. Breaston may be marginally faster, but the whole reason he dropped so much in the draft and was so overshadowed by Manningham was his lack of athleticism. Dont forget that what Breaston does, he does between arguably the best WR tandem in the NFL.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
texbumthelife;2892163 said:
My point being, we would still have a glut of possession WR's and receivers with potential.

Is that what Dallas has? Roy Williams is not a possession receiver in my opinion. Crayton is. Austin is not. Hurd is. I don't know if two accounts for a glut. I agree that there is a glut of guys with potential or probably better described as a bunch of unproven guys. Get rid of Crayton and Dallas gets rid of their only proven possession receiver. I don't think Breaston is a proven possession receiver yet, but that can change after this season.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
I like Breaston, for sure, as a #3 but it's really hard to say just how good a #2 he'd be here when he wouldn't be playing with Boldin and Fitz anymore.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
MarionBarberThe4th;2892144 said:
Speed. Craytons another chains mover.

Crayton has had a higher YPC in all five seasons he has played than Breaston has had in either season he has played.
 
Top