Still holding onto Cooper in the offseason?

your math is way off

the difference between Gallup and Cooper money might barely be enough to sign one starter, not "a stud DT" and Gregory raise
Probably a 7 million dollar savings. So no, not a stud DT. But if it’s a long term deal we can back load it.
 
I think Cooper will take a team friendly deal, he seemed miserable with the Raiders, seems to enjoy it a lot here. Never count out the mental health aspect.
 
People are going to have to come to terms that some good players are going to have to be shown the door for long term salary cap success. This was New England’s specialty, Dallas has always been horrible with these types of decisions.

The time to get good at it is now, before it’s to late and you’re losing good AND young players because you can’t afford them.

I think sacrificing players like Coop, Tank, and eventually Zeke are decisions this team is going to have to make if they want to enjoy anything other than abbreviated success. They have players in those positions already that can be paid much less that are comparable, and you can always draft good RBs.

It’s getting close to time for a lot of tough decisions this franchise is going to have to make. When in doubt go with good, young, and cheap (or cheaper) before better, extremely high paid, and in their prime now guys. Just my 2 cents.
 
22 million be used elsewhere? This has always been a hot topic. It will certainly depend on Gallup. In my opinion we no longer need to pay Cooper 22 million when Lamb as the new #1. I try to sign Gallup for a reasonable price.
Something is always going on with Coop and it showed against NE. Coop looked real slow in his route running, didn't have that extra gear that #1's need to carry a team. Injuries are finally affecting his legs in a bad way and without healthy legs he's not worth the bank he's being paid.
 
I dont see what that has to do with anything.

Its about roster and salary cap management.
.

It means don't fix what is not broken. Why would you want to make salary cap tweaks when the offense is rolling? I'd rather just to take the wins.
 
Something is always going on with Coop and it showed against NE. Coop looked real slow in his route running, didn't have that extra gear that #1's need to carry a team. Injuries are finally affecting his legs in a bad way and without healthy legs he's not worth the bank he's being paid.
Yah and he has that stiff body type where the just seem to get injured more.
 
Cooper is an old 27.

I agree though that Cooper isnt going anywhere. I dont think Jerry's ego could handle it.

I think they find a way to keep Shultz.
I don't think Shultz will be as hard to keep as some think. We are in a cap crunch this year, but his year 1 cap hit should be low. Our cap situation will be more manageable in 2023 and beyond because this is the last year of the depressed cap, and the cap will go up alot when the TV deal hits.
 
It means don't fix what is not broken. Why would you want to make salary cap tweaks when the offense is rolling? I'd rather just to take the wins.
Don’t need cooper. Need more defense.
 
I think Cooper stays, at the moment...things can change.
My guess is they redo his deal and push his out to post 2023

@CowboyRoy isnt wrong about his injury concerns. He could be an old 27. That's a real concern if you are looking to have him into his 30's. I think he will be here for most of Lambs rookie deal, and then we will move on
 
My guess is they redo his deal and push his out to post 2023

@CowboyRoy isnt wrong about his injury concerns. He could be an old 27. That's a real concern if you are looking to have him into his 30's. I think he will be here for most of Lambs rookie deal, and then we will move on
I agree, they won't pay both Lamb and Coop top dollar, so #19 has 2 more years at the most.
 
Pretty funny how out of touch some people on this thread are about Gallup’s price tag next season. Look at Curtis Samuel/Kenny Golloday/Corey Davis contracts. These are going to be the general starting points for his negotiations.

Anyone who thinks 10-12M is his price tag is completely ignoring the WR precedent. If a team thinks you can be a 1B-type you will get 14-15M at least.

Shoot even a guy like Sterling Shepard who is a true slot #2 type and signed a contact years ago has a 14M cap hit this season.
 
I believe we'll keep Schultz and possibly the $4.25 million we'd save next year to cut Jarwin will allow that. First year of the deal should be pretty low.
Schultz is BY FAR the more complete tight end. Jarwin doesn’t really even pretend to block anyone.
 
Gallup’s contract comps are Curtis Samuel to Kenny Galloday. 13-16M will be where Gallup’s negotiations begin. If we get him for 12M he’s given a major hometown discount.
Golliday is by far the better player than Gallup. He is Baby Megatron.
 
People are going to have to come to terms that some good players are going to have to be shown the door for long term salary cap success. This was New England’s specialty, Dallas has always been horrible with these types of decisions.

The time to get good at it is now, before it’s to late and you’re losing good AND young players because you can’t afford them.

I think sacrificing players like Coop, Tank, and eventually Zeke are decisions this team is going to have to make if they want to enjoy anything other than abbreviated success. They have players in those positions already that can be paid much less that are comparable, and you can always draft good RBs.

It’s getting close to time for a lot of tough decisions this franchise is going to have to make. When in doubt go with good, young, and cheap (or cheaper) before better, extremely high paid, and in their prime now guys. Just my 2 cents.
That's the blueprint for on field success in the NFL. Now with Mccarthy at helm I trust the FO to stop paying 2nd & 3rd tier players elite salaries.
 
Gallup’s contract comps are Curtis Samuel to Kenny Galloday. 13-16M will be where Gallup’s negotiations begin. If we get him for 12M he’s given a major hometown discount.
We ain’t paying him 12 but you may be right that he gets 13 plus
 
I don't think Gallup can replace Coop.
I don't think he's that good.
I don't think Lamb is Lamb without Coop either and Gallup doesn't change the equation.

Just my opinion, but I get that there's a cap and sacrifices must be made as regards to personnel.

Some tough decisions ahead, to be sure.

Totally with you. I think Coop is worth the cap hit. I really like Gallup as well but don't anticipate Gallup being a cheap signing. In order to really look at it we'd need to know Gallups numbers as well as the cap hit. I'm just not sure you can save enough to justify letting Coop go.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,608
Messages
14,547,583
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top