Beast_from_East
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 30,390
- Reaction score
- 27,567
Questioning calls is not whinning when there are legit concerns.
Is it whinning to ask why there was no flag on using the ball as a prop when even Marshal Faulk brought it up on NFL network???
Is it whinning to ask why the fumble by Warner at the end of the game was not reviewed, even though an earlier fumble was overturned by challenge meaning the refs could have got this one wrong also???
Is it whinning to ask why Harrison was not ejected for punching a Cardinal in the head when even the announcers mentioned it was over the line???
Combine these calls with all the calls Pitt got against the Seahawks (it was so bad that Holmgreen even said they had to "play against the refs also"), then people start to notice and have legit questions about the credibility of the officiating.
Is it whinning to ask why there was no flag on using the ball as a prop when even Marshal Faulk brought it up on NFL network???
Is it whinning to ask why the fumble by Warner at the end of the game was not reviewed, even though an earlier fumble was overturned by challenge meaning the refs could have got this one wrong also???
Is it whinning to ask why Harrison was not ejected for punching a Cardinal in the head when even the announcers mentioned it was over the line???
Combine these calls with all the calls Pitt got against the Seahawks (it was so bad that Holmgreen even said they had to "play against the refs also"), then people start to notice and have legit questions about the credibility of the officiating.
