That's because Romo took forever and never got the ball off. I guess you could say it was a coverage sack.
I don't think the O-Line betrayed Romo. He not only couldn't beat the Panthers in the passing game, he was giving them turnovers and to make it worse...they ended up being TD's. He had plenty of time to throw all game long and if he could have beaten them with the pass, perhaps that opens up some running lanes.
YR
Rich I know you love piling on Romo and you certainly didn't miss a chance today but you must've been the only person in this whole forum who didn't hear, read or know what Tony said in his post game press conference. He admitted he wasn't right, he admitted that lack of reps hurt him, he was not processing coverage and tried to fit the ball into spaces he would never normally do.
Yours was the critical cheap shot summation - this is the critical fair summation.
"Romo made bad decisions against Carolina and admitted as such. If he wasn't right and not seeing the field, Lineman should've just dumbed down the game plan, Romo should've checked down, made higher percentage throws and tried to work through it to get us to the fourth quarter where he could've worked some magic but it just didn't happen. The thought process that makes him great also makes him vulnerable and if he''s not physically and mentally right - he's going to get exposed and the was obviously exposed against the Panthers."
A fair and honest appraisal with context and not the hyperbole you injected.
Further --
What game were you watching? In the very same thread that has a video showing a 3 on 5 defensive sack that got him hurt you claim he had plenty of time. He was also never going to beat them with the pass. Not with his limited work leading up to the game. The only way we were going to win that game was pound the ball, maintain possession, get some turnovers and pick our spots with some throws in the red zone.
Nice try - but see how easy it is to just give the facts and not lose credibility?