SultanOfSix
Star Power
- Messages
- 12,993
- Reaction score
- 8,246
Garrett's pathetic offense without Romo will make any defense worse than it is - whether it is bad on its own or not - even the 2000 Ravens' defense.
I think this is most telling:
Virtually nothing in between the hashmarks. Not that I think the Cowboys defend in between the hashmarks that well, but it's apparent that the book on the defense is to throw to the outside, right near the numbers.
I know that offenses around the league don't throw down the middle that much, but this is ridiculous.
I think it's a lack of corner tackling (screens) struggles with pick plays (especially quick hitters) and a lack of team speed on defense. YR
The answer why we are not creating turnovers is so simple. We had 31 turnovers last year on defense. Let's look who had them......
Bruce Carter 5 INts
Orlando Scandrick 2 ints 2 FF
Justin Durant 1 int 1 FR 2 FF
Sterling Moore 2 FR 1 FF
George Selvie 1 FR 1 FF
Dwayne Harris 1 FR
Anthony Spencer 1 FR 2 FF
C.J. Spillman 1 FR 1 FF
Henry Melton 2 FR
Keith Smith 1 FF
Terrell McClain 1 FF
FF=Forced fumble
FR=Fumbles recovered
INT=interception
17 of the 31 turnovers are from guys that are no longer here......
We are on pace for 8 this season.....Do the math
The guys that were creating all those turnovers are no longer part of the organization....
Now look @ this year......
Sean Lee 1 INT
J.J. Wilcox 1 INT
Greg Hardy 1 INT 1 FF
Nick Hayden 1 FR
And that's it...........4 turnovers
Wow - and to think the stuff that is uncovered in here is done for free.
I haven't seen one "paid" reporter ever bring this up. Check's in the mail Floaty.
Not to hard to figure. Of Last years 18 interceptions, 9 were by LBs. 5 from carter, to from McClain and one each from Durant and Hitchens.Dallas had the same non ballhawk type players in the back seven. And still were 2nd in the nfl in takeovers last yr.
Lack of turnovers is 100% because teams know they dont have to take chances. Because they know the offense is going to give them extra chances.
It seems "bad luck" is affecting our pass rush. However, all of the bad luck is on the other side of the ball where opposing offensive lines are constantly having to play back up tackles.
Yet, here we sit with one sack in the past two games.
The answer why we are not creating turnovers is so simple. We had 31 turnovers last year on defense. Let's look who had them......
Bruce Carter 5 INts
Orlando Scandrick 2 ints 2 FF
Justin Durant 1 int 1 FR 2 FF
Sterling Moore 2 FR 1 FF
George Selvie 1 FR 1 FF
Dwayne Harris 1 FR
Anthony Spencer 1 FR 2 FF
C.J. Spillman 1 FR 1 FF
Henry Melton 2 FR
Keith Smith 1 FF
Terrell McClain 1 FF
FF=Forced fumble
FR=Fumbles recovered
INT=interception
17 of the 31 turnovers are from guys that are no longer here......
We are on pace for 8 this season.....Do the math
The guys that were creating all those turnovers are no longer part of the organization....
Now look @ this year......
Sean Lee 1 INT
J.J. Wilcox 1 INT
Greg Hardy 1 INT 1 FF
Nick Hayden 1 FR
And that's it...........4 turnovers
Garrett's pathetic offense without Romo will make any defense worse than it is - whether it is bad on its own or not - even the 2000 Ravens' defense.
I think there is more going on than what this article brings to light. Example, back when Zimmer was here they had a statistically good defense while the offense was incompetent at best. I cannot recall the exact year (Campo era?) or rankings but that years team could not muster any offensive threat at all but yet the defense didn't seem as porous as the 2015 version.
Craig
Don't even know what to say anymore. This team is an EMBARASSMENT on the very highest level imaginable. Week after week the same bull ****. Have a chance to win a football game. They throw an interception and gift a team points. Can't stop the run, cant get pressure on Bradford who has been under fire all season long. An Eagles offense that has been anemic all season long did whatever they wanted really. This team simply isn't what we all thought. Last year was a fluke clearly. We just stink. Same mistakes. Linebackers overrunning plays, safeties taking bad angles, defensive ends not containing, corners not playing the ball, and the same predictable, vanilla scheme on offense.
Sorry but this is a bunch of garbage and even trying to sound analytical doesnt make it sound less idiotic. Dallas isnt getting TOs because of one thing. Teams are nickle and diming the whole game. Teams know cowboys arent going to jump out to a lead. So they are taking what they give them and working it until the defense tires. Because the offense has no juice. If you dont believe me look at every game since Romo has been out. IDC who Sturm is and how much tape he watches. All he has to do is watch once to see teams are getting very minimal big plays on this defense. Rather running short slants and making some short plays with missed tackles into some big plays. Dallas probably gets picked more than any team because this team plays stingy defense early. Problem is the offense and ST puts this def in bad posistions. Watch the first eagles game where dallas came out hot and you see what this defense does when teams have to play catchup. Get out of here with this garbage Sturm.
Agreed. I think Sturm lays out a good case why we shouldn't be surprised that takeaways are down vs last year when the team led most of the time.
What Sturm can't explain, no anybody else on the planet, is why the 2015 Dallas Cowboys are on pace to smash the NFL record for fewest takeaways in a season... Why of the approx 1110 '16 game seasons' they have been played since since 1978 by all teams when they moved to 16 games, that the Cowboys are on pace to be the worst of those 1110 in one half of the most important NFL metric of them all - turnover ratio.
I haven't seen anybody offer up a good theory, because I don't think one it exists.
Well, there's a reasonable theory about the takeaways, anyway.
but according to some its the offenses fault. and directly garrett's fault...but when good plays happen its all linehan, every play that fails its garrett even if its the same damn play that worked once and didn't another time....
If you read the article, it makes a case for the defensive problems are rooted in the general ineffectiveness of the offense to put pressure on the other team. That is a very clear trend going back to when Jason first became OC. Last year, the emergence of a legit running game, along with Romo's continued bail out ability, finally turned that around.