Nightman
Capologist
- Messages
- 27,121
- Reaction score
- 24,038
So, was Murray a great running back and if so, where was his greatness in Philly?
Murray was great for us and Kelly only signed him to hurt us and it did.
So, was Murray a great running back and if so, where was his greatness in Philly?
Does he have to give back his 5000 career rushing yards?
Zeke is great as lead blocker and with him and Rod defenses will won't know who is blocking and who is running
He was the 4th overall pick and has averaged 53 yds a game....he is easy to tackle and runs too upright
Being overdrafted and playing on terrible teams doesn't make DMC "unsuited for the NFL". I know you guys don't like him, but its kind of comical to read posts saying he can't play in the NFL when he has 8 years in the NFL and just came off a 1000 yard season.
Last year he averaged 68 yards behind the Stampede...easy too tackle doesn't = can't play, just means he isn't very good.......very mediocre and not worth the 2m hit......he doesn't even fit the blocking scheme
Smart money says the guy who comes through the hole first is the lead blocker!
Murray was great for us and Kelly only signed him to hurt us and it did.
Cmon, you are way better than this. He "averaged 68 yards a game" if you include the early seasons games where he got 5 carries, 6 carries and 6 carries as a backup. In the 11 games he started he averaged 87 yards a game on a team with zero passing threat.
Over the season 87 yards per game would have tied for third in the NFL. That doesn't make him great (or underpaid) but it knocks out the argument in this thread that he doesn't belong in the NFL.
Murray was great for us and Kelly only signed him to hurt us and it did.
Great points. He didnt start all the games and only got a few carries while randle was the lead back so the numbers do not mcfadden justice. It would be similar to saying " romo didnt throw many tds last year"
I was just talking about a choice between Dunbar and DMC. I would gladly upgrade Dunbar as well.
Our fans infatuation with mediocre RBs is mind blowing.
Last offseason Sturm wrote about McFadden and pointed out that the Raiders averaged like 5.6 ypc or something ridiculous every time someone other than McFadden carried the ball, and only 3.6 ypc when he did. Last year without McFadden on the roster the Raiders averaged 3.9 ypc. Maybe the Raiders would trade for McFadden to not give him the ball, thereby boosting their running game back to the lofty heights in enjoyed before they released him.
http://sportsday.***BANNED-URL***/d...al-2015-cowboys-running-game-data-man-vs-zone
We've talked about this briefly before, but I think it is clear the Cowboys were trying to not repeat the same mistake they made in 2015 with McFadden, and yes ultimately as well as he did, I do think signing him was a mistake. Not because he isn't a decent player, but simply because he doesn't do extremely well in a zone blocking scheme. If we ran a man blocking scheme, I would probably say that McFadden probably could have been our starter and that drafting Zeke would have been the mistake.
But that isn't the reality that we live in and as most of you know I was on the Zeke bandwagon from the beginning when people were telling us all to stop talking about Zeke because we were never going to draft him. I digress, this isn't a post about bragging.
The point that is that the Cowboys are now, directly targeting running backs who have scheme fit. Alfred Morris comes from a ZBS and had an extremely high success level when Shanahan was their coach. Zeke also comes from a ZBS in Ohio State. Both players are tested within our scheme. This is why I somewhat question the drafting of Darius Jackson who scouting reports suggest has extremely limited vision. Someone mentioned Rod Smith potentially becoming a fullback, which would give him the best chance to stick with the team, but at 6'3, I find that isn't likely either.
I think when a lot of people suggested that the Cowboys didn't need a running back they didn't properly consider that McFadden didn't fit here. The argument was that he had over 1000 yards without Romo and Dez, and without starting from week 1. While there is a lot of truth to that, I feel like that argument doesn't tell the whole story and doesn't speak to the inconsistency of our running game last year.
Rather than try to make the most success out of putting a square peg in a circle hole, we made the right choice of getting circle pegs to fit the circle hole. This is going to pay dividends for our offense and give us a level of success surpassing that of 2014*. We just need to stay healthy. Speaking health, I think that is probably why they went with Morris over Foster who I think is a much better back but also older and more injury prone.
I wouldn't be surprised if McFadden doesn't make the team. Not because he isn't a really good running back, he is, but because he just doesn't fit here. Will anyone trade for him? I seriously doubt it, but I think he could go to a team that focuses on man running, has a good offensive line, and put in another really productive year for them and maybe it's worth it to keep him on the roster to prevent that from happening say for the Eagles or Giants.
If you look back at 2014, the Cowboys barely had Murray off the field. McFadden won't see a ton of playing time if he can't improve his zone reads. I do think the team was desperate and didn't realize how bad he was in zone read plays. I think it was somewhat of a failure of the pro scouting team, but also I think they felt like they were going to be able to get a running back last year in the draft and it didn't work out. I think we would have taken Gurley or Gordon if they fell to us. I think Jerry might have also been involved with the choice to get McFadden.
To say RBs should fit any scheme simply isn't accurate.
It would be like saying QBs fit any scheme or CBs e.t.c.
Some players fit specific schemes and that's that.
one thing is likability .
If McF is RKG and liked by jg and coaches, he will be kept.
I am hoping they use Jackson to return kicks/punts, and play ST.
Morris is a unknown, and they will need to see him play to decide on him.
He may need to show something in PS.
He is a RKG so that helps him, and the blocking, and pass catching are things
to look at with him.
resdkins haven't produced quality offensive players since they got RG3 and Morris.. The QB play has been worse every year since RG3 was drafted and that has an impact on the running game.