Sturm on why the Cowboys sit out free agency

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,395
Reaction score
10,064
Let’s project this out: Diggs (five years, $100 million, $20 million per), Lamb (five years, $125 million, $25 million per) and Parsons conservatively at five years for $150 million ($30 million per), and you hope Dak Prescott remains at around $40 million per year. Now, you understand the Cowboys’ roster has four guys at $115 million per season and that is their core for now. They should have roughly that total again to fill out the other 50 guys on the roster. Now you know the Cowboys aren’t chasing too many things in free agency.

-

There just isn't enough pie when in the next couple of years you may be giving half of it to 4 players.

But we should be quite used to this....

-

Since Carr in 2012? The five biggest free-agent signings are all small with no impact: Henry Melton, Benson Mayowa, Cedric Thornton, Nolan Carroll and Gerald McCoy … I guess? Five biggest impacts? Robert Quinn has to count, technically a trade. Jeremy Mincey? Jayron Kearse? We really cannot come up with five. They have literally stopped shopping in free agency beyond one-year deals almost at all. Maybe they have something planned this year. Don’t cross your fingers.

-

That is a scary list. We just don't do free agency. Free agency bad. Add to that the impending deals for Diggs, Lamb and Micah that they have to budget for and you can see why any hopes for a Wagner or Hopkins or even OBJ are probably just a pipe dream.
The Cowboys approach is silly. They openly say that they are budgeting for these players. Thus forcing them to actually sign for those big amounts. They don't understand the power of leverage.
 

robertfchew

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
1,044
Yeah Diggs, Lamb and Parsons make it precarious giving away any big deals. The team doesn’t want to risk losing those guys. I think they’ll sign a free agent receiver to a moderate contract but nothing over 8-10 million per.
Diggs is not worth re signing. Did any of you actually watch the payoff game vs sf. Biggest game of the year and he defecates himself. Not a guy you give money to. He’s like a 5 million a year dude he will never sniff that one year with a ton of picks and his entire career will probably be overinflated because of that.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,800
Reaction score
11,440
Let’s project this out: Diggs (five years, $100 million, $20 million per), Lamb (five years, $125 million, $25 million per) and Parsons conservatively at five years for $150 million ($30 million per), and you hope Dak Prescott remains at around $40 million per year. Now, you understand the Cowboys’ roster has four guys at $115 million per season and that is their core for now. They should have roughly that total again to fill out the other 50 guys on the roster. Now you know the Cowboys aren’t chasing too many things in free agency.

-

There just isn't enough pie when in the next couple of years you may be giving half of it to 4 players.

But we should be quite used to this....

-

Since Carr in 2012? The five biggest free-agent signings are all small with no impact: Henry Melton, Benson Mayowa, Cedric Thornton, Nolan Carroll and Gerald McCoy … I guess? Five biggest impacts? Robert Quinn has to count, technically a trade. Jeremy Mincey? Jayron Kearse? We really cannot come up with five. They have literally stopped shopping in free agency beyond one-year deals almost at all. Maybe they have something planned this year. Don’t cross your fingers.

-

That is a scary list. We just don't do free agency. Free agency bad. Add to that the impending deals for Diggs, Lamb and Micah that they have to budget for and you can see why any hopes for a Wagner or Hopkins or even OBJ are probably just a pipe dream.
Hardy should be listed. What they waste, $13M for a season?
 
Top