T.O. says Jerry 'blindsided' him - 3/28/09

[khiladi]

"The point is that he wasn't interviewing for the same job that he currently had. It was for a promotion. He already has a job... one that he wasn't released from. And we decided to eat a multi-million dollar cap hit, just so we could get rid of TO. It cost us money to cut him. Garrett on the other hand, it costs us money to keep him."Interesting... I made the point, and your telling me what my point was? Let me make it easier for you. What does the decision of the Buffalo Bills have to do with why we kept or released TO? Absolutely nothing. What does the decision of the Detroit Lions or the Saint Louis Rams rejecting Garrett have to do with the Dallas Cowboys? Absolutely nothing. You said the only team that allegedly wanted TO was the Buffalo Bills, which says a lot about him. But guess what? The Detroit Lions rejected Jason Garrett. The Saint Louis Rams rejected Garrett. These pitiful organizations rejected Garrett. As I said, your logic sucks. I own you."A proper analogy would be if TO were interviewing for a job that he wasn't previously doing.... Or say if Garrett had been fired and he didn't get any offers for Offensive Coordinator positions except from one team in Canada. But it's not the same. Therefore your comparison is ********."Sorry. it doesn't work that way. You can't tell me how to make an analogy, of which I am very well aware of. I explicitly defined the terms of my analogy, which were valid terms, before you even opened up your mouth. I was comparing the 'prestigious nature of the organization' that TO went to with the 'prestigious nature of the organizations' that rejected Garrett. It isn't that complex, but I'm sure you knew that. Your just trying to weasle yourself out of your own jumping the gun yet again. I'm obviously in your head for you to go to such absurd lengths to make such a useless point. "I said by all accounts.... meaning all reports were that there weren't any other teams interested. You got some evidence that he got other offers? What does this have to do with the topic at hand.... That being your comparison of Garrett's situation to TO is worthless. Oh I know. You endlessly feel the need to prop up your hero. When can we expect you to leave this board and go to the Buffalo one? I love it when people declare themselves the winner, especially when they have no idea what the debate is about" What evidence do you have that he didn't get any offers? Oh yeah, you didn't. According to TOs agent, he had more than one suitor. He further got a high-paying job, more money that he was actually going to make in Dallas. It is no coincidence that you just avoided the fact that two younger receivers, Torry Holt and Marvin Harrison are still out of a job, despite being younger than TO and lesser of a 'cancer'. I don't have to procialm myself a winner, when it is obvious I am the winner. The thing you seem to have a hard time grasping is, theer was no debate. I made an analogy which you can't refute. If people say TO could only get a job with a pathetic organization such as Buffalo, than what does that say for Garrett as a coach, who got rejected by the Lions and Rams? The analogy is based upon 'pathetic organizations refusing or taking a person for a job'. There is no debate about it. The analogy isn't set by the terms you are now trying to define them in, to weasle yourself out of your own embarassing ability to not make a sound argument. Face it, the only thing you can say is things like "In your eyes, Garrett started WW2, yada, yada, yada". "My only point in this is to tell you how bad your comparison of Garrett's situation to TO's is. LOL... again declaring yourself the winner. I don't see anyone else agreeing with you. Yeah you've proven that Captain hurry up offense.... Tell everyone again how we were always running the hurry up while letting the play clock run down to 5 seconds or less on every play. Typical... You've admitted you have an agenda against Garrett. Anyone who disagrees with you must be a Garrett Homer. Again, love that logic. Bet you won a lot of arguments over play doh in kindergarten last year."It's obvious I'm in your head, that is why you follow me around. It is obvious I agitated you in that discussion and beat you silly, that is why you follow me around. It is obvious that your trying to regain your ego by trying to project that the sum and substance of my argument was allegedly that we always run the ball down to 5 seconds or less on every play. Don't need to remind you that I simply destroyed you when I brought up the fact that we went five 3 and outs from quarters 2 and 3, with an additional 2 4 and outs during that game. But I'm not going to cycle it for you. I don't need people to agree with me, maybe like you do, to give you some soret of seld-assurance. It is obvious who is playing the role of a person in kindergarden. It definitely isn't me. Just own up to it. Ever since that discussion on Garrett, where I owned you, I've been in your head.

 

[5Stars]

"The point is that he wasn't interviewing for the same job that he currently had. It was for a promotion. He already has a job... one that he wasn't released from. And we decided to eat a multi-million dollar cap hit, just so we could get rid of TO. It cost us money to cut him. Garrett on the other hand, it costs us money to keep him."Interesting... I made the point, and your telling me what my point was? Let me make it easier for you. What does the decision of the Buffalo Bills have to do with why we kept or released TO? Absolutely nothing. What does the decision of the Detroit Lions or the Saint Louis Rams rejecting Garrett have to do with the Dallas Cowboys? Absolutely nothing. You said the only team that allegedly wanted TO was the Buffalo Bills, which says a lot about him. But guess what? The Detroit Lions rejected Jason Garrett. The Saint Louis Rams rejected Garrett. These pitiful organizations rejected Garrett. As I said, your logic sucks. I own you."A proper analogy would be if TO were interviewing for a job that he wasn't previously doing.... Or say if Garrett had been fired and he didn't get any offers for Offensive Coordinator positions except from one team in Canada. But it's not the same. Therefore your comparison is ********."Sorry. it doesn't work that way. You can't tell me how to make an analogy, of which I am very well aware of. I explicitly defined the terms of my analogy, which were valid terms, before you even opened up your mouth. I was comparing the 'prestigious nature of the organization' that TO went to with the 'prestigious nature of the organizations' that rejected Garrett. It isn't that complex, but I'm sure you knew that. Your just trying to weasle yourself out of your own jumping the gun yet again. I'm obviously in your head for you to go to such absurd lengths to make such a useless point. "I said by all accounts.... meaning all reports were that there weren't any other teams interested. You got some evidence that he got other offers? What does this have to do with the topic at hand.... That being your comparison of Garrett's situation to TO is worthless. Oh I know. You endlessly feel the need to prop up your hero. When can we expect you to leave this board and go to the Buffalo one? I love it when people declare themselves the winner, especially when they have no idea what the debate is about" What evidence do you have that he didn't get any offers? Oh yeah, you didn't. According to TOs agent, he had more than one suitor. He further got a high-paying job, more money that he was actually going to make in Dallas. It is no coincidence that you just avoided the fact that two younger receivers, Torry Holt and Marvin Harrison are still out of a job, despite being younger than TO and lesser of a 'cancer'. I don't have to procialm myself a winner, when it is obvious I am the winner. The thing you seem to have a hard time grasping is, theer was no debate. I made an analogy which you can't refute. If people say TO could only get a job with a pathetic organization such as Buffalo, than what does that say for Garrett as a coach, who got rejected by the Lions and Rams? The analogy is based upon 'pathetic organizations refusing or taking a person for a job'. There is no debate about it. The analogy isn't set by the terms you are now trying to define them in, to weasle yourself out of your own embarassing ability to not make a sound argument. Face it, the only thing you can say is things like "In your eyes, Garrett started WW2, yada, yada, yada". "My only point in this is to tell you how bad your comparison of Garrett's situation to TO's is. LOL... again declaring yourself the winner. I don't see anyone else agreeing with you. Yeah you've proven that Captain hurry up offense.... Tell everyone again how we were always running the hurry up while letting the play clock run down to 5 seconds or less on every play. Typical... You've admitted you have an agenda against Garrett. Anyone who disagrees with you must be a Garrett Homer. Again, love that logic. Bet you won a lot of arguments over play doh in kindergarten last year."It's obvious I'm in your head, that is why you follow me around. It is obvious I agitated you in that discussion and beat you silly, that is why you follow me around. It is obvious that your trying to regain your ego by trying to project that the sum and substance of my argument was allegedly that we always run the ball down to 5 seconds or less on every play. Don't need to remind you that I simply destroyed you when I brought up the fact that we went five 3 and outs from quarters 2 and 3, with an additional 2 4 and outs during that game. But I'm not going to cycle it for you. I don't need people to agree with me, maybe like you do, to give you some soret of seld-assurance. It is obvious who is playing the role of a person in kindergarden. It definitely isn't me. Just own up to it. Ever since that discussion on Garrett, where I owned you, I've been in your head.

What a garbage post! I'm not reading this crap.

If you want to "pump him up"...you better wait until you use some paragraphs or something!

You say you are going through a proxy server or something? No, you are going through withdrawls!

HE'S GONE! GET OVER IT!

Better yet...just go the iColdasHell.com and find your suger daddy over there!

(some peoples kids)....

 

[Chocolate Lab]

Seeing him interviewed on NFLN via Canadian TV tonight just makes me even more happy that his paranoid, narcissistic, lunatic *** is out of here.

Thank you again Jerry!

 

[Dave_in-NC]

ARe you really going to argue that TOs issues with Philly weren't contractual? TO fighting with teammates happened ultimately as a RESULT OF THE CONTRACT DISPUTE. This is so well-documented nobody can deny it. When the contractual dispute situation resulted in McNabb siding with the organization, the rift between Owens and McNabb grew, with some supporting the QB and some supporting the WR. Alos, like I said, whether or not those were the reasons you never liked Owens doesn't matter, because those reasons, contract dispute, weren't what defined his actions here. Those reasons is what defined how you perceived of him when he was here, even though he never had a contract dispute and nobody on the team has actually come out and bashed him. In Philly, those who weren't on his side were well-known. As far as misery, you must have been miserable the last two yuears then, considering your boy Parcells is in Miami, not in Dallas. I thought you didn't like Wade?

I didn't say owens wasn't arguing his contract. I said owens was fighting with team mates. They had nothing to do with his contract. As usual owens involved every one around him weather they mattered or not. He had to take the low road, per his usual.

I'm sure the players heard owens complain, piss and moan way more than they cared to. He doesn't get that no one cares what he has to say.
He's way more important in his own mind, than he is to any one else.
That has been proven three times now.

Just because our players took the high road doesn't mean they liked him.
Maybe they knew his days were numbered way before we did.

As far as Parcells goes, yeah I thought it sucked he left. I wish he hadn't.
He did a great job in Miami last season and that will probably continue since he has no Jerry there. No GM signing total idiots like owens to ruin what he is building. Time will tell.

You going up to Buffalo to see your boy play this season?:

 

[peplaw06]

blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah. I win

touche

 

[Rampage]

touche

:laugh2:

 

[khiladi]

touche

Oh, you read it for your sure... I especially like the lame attempt at referencing kindergarten and following it up with 'blah blah blah'. It must suck to be owned by a person that didn't pay big bucks to go to law school to learn how to argue.

 

[khiladi]

What a garbage post! I'm not reading this crap.

If you want to "pump him up"...you better wait until you use some paragraphs or something!

You say you are going through a proxy server or something? No, you are going through withdrawls!

HE'S GONE! GET OVER IT!

Better yet...just go the iColdasHell.com and find your suger daddy over there!


(some peoples kids)....

Tell me, what is it like to pretend to not care, but actually care so much to make such a pathetic post, that just demonstrates the fact that you follow me around?

 

[TellerMorrow34]

Has there ever been another player on this team that has ever been able to divide people so much that they go on and on and on and on and on and on and on about the guy even after he's no longer with the team?

 

[khiladi]

I didn't say owens wasn't arguing his contract. I said owens was fighting with team mates. They had nothing to do with his contract. As usual owens involved every one around him weather they mattered or not. He had to take the low road, per his usual.

I'm sure the players heard owens complain, piss and moan way more than they cared to. He doesn't get that no one cares what he has to say.
He's way more important in his own mind, than he is to any one else.
That has been proven three times now.

Just because our players took the high road doesn't mean they liked him.
Maybe they knew his days were numbered way before we did.

As far as Parcells goes, yeah I thought it sucked he left. I wish he hadn't.
He did a great job in Miami last season and that will probably continue since he has no Jerry there. No GM signing total idiots like owens to ruin what he is building. Time will tell.


You going up to Buffalo to see your boy play this season?:

I know you didn't say TO wasn't arguing his contract. I said it, because it was a totally different context between Philly and Dallas. Further, there is no evidence that TO fought with players like he did in Philly. The only way you can justify your position that it was different is by operating under the assumption that our players 'took the high road' and didn't actually like him. Your basing everything on "I'm sure". This isn't substantiated and to further complement the point, Jerry himself said he didn't consult any players about releasing TO, Tony Romo included. Cowboys players have all come out and supported Owens, whether before the release, during the period of silence and eve after the release. The only thing TO can legitimately be called out for is calling out Garrett, but he is no different than countless players, among them Clinton Portis who blasted Zorn. Garrett flat-out was stinking up the joint. Further, Romo called Garrett out to and so did Roy Williams. And as far as Parcells, you missed the point. Why are you whining that he isn't here anymore and defending him on this forum, when it's been two years? Why not go root for Miami?

 

[khiladi]

Has there ever been another player on this team that has ever been able to divide people so much that they go on and on and on and on and on and on and on about the guy even after he's no longer with the team?

Parcells still divides this team. People whine and whine that he is not here, and it's been over two years now. In the context of TO threads, they suddenly become all high-and-mighty, complaining about the whining about a player that is no longer here. Amusing... What is further evident of their hypocrisy is that they join in every single TO thread out there, but act as if they don't care. Then they like to jump on those that support TO, without even dealing with the actual issues to testify to the fact they have 'moved on'.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

I know you didn't say TO wasn't arguing his contract. I said it, because it was a totally different context between Philly and Dallas. Further, there is no evidence that TO fought with players like he did in Philly. The only way you can justify your position that it was different is by operating under the assumption that our players 'took the high road' and didn't actually like him. Your basing everything on "I'm sure". This isn't substantiated and to further complement the point, Jerry himself said he didn't consult any players about releasing TO, Tony Romo included. Cowboys players have all come out and supported Owens, whether before the release, during the period of silence and eve after the release. The only thing TO can legitimately be called out for is calling out Garrett, but he is no different than countless players, among them Clinton Portis who blasted Zorn. Garrett flat-out was stinking up the joint. Further, Romo called Garrett out to and so did Roy Williams. And as far as Parcells, you missed the point. Why are you whining that he isn't here anymore and defending him on this forum, when it's been two years? Why not go root for Miami?

We are never going to see eye to eye on this, can we agree? You have an opinion of owens that he has never done nothing wrong and isn't a problem.

Three profesional sports teams would disagree with you. But hey what do they know? Jones gave away millions to rid the Cowboys of owens. Gave it away, if that don't sink in on you well, nothing will.

What does Parcells have to do with any thing any way?
I have not complained on a daily basis about his leaving. I have never said you weren't a Cowboy fan and you should go root for the Bills.

I simply asked if you were going to go watch owens play in Buffalo.

Carry on with the owens whine fest, I actually find great pleasure in it.

It means he isn't here any more.

 

[khiladi]

We are never going to see eye to eye on this, can we agree? You have an opinion of owens that he has never done nothing wrong and isn't a problem.

Three profesional sports teams would disagree with you. But hey what do they know? Jones gave away millions to rid the Cowboys of owens. Gave it away, if that don't sink in on you well, nothing will.

What does Parcells have to do with any thing any way?
I have not complained on a daily basis about his leaving. I have never said you weren't a Cowboy fan and you should go root for the Bills.

I simply asked if you were going to go watch owens play in Buffalo.

Carry on with the owens whine fest, I actually find great pleasure in it.


It means he isn't here any more.

Jones didn't give millions away. That millions was already given away last year. Jones saved money by not having to pay Owens an additional 3 million in bonus money. HE SAVED MONEY. And again, you keep ignoring the fact that ever player has come out an supported Owens and act as if the 'organization' saw him as a problem. Who is this organization you keep speaking of? If players came out and criticized Garrett, among them Roy Williams and Romo, what makes you think they took the high-road when it came to TO? Why did Jerry say he didn't consult the players on the matter? Even Wade praised TO and likened the media attacks on him to the attacks on his own personality. That is not a 'political line'. And Parcells has everything to do with it? Whether or not it is 'daily basis' you complain about it. You defend him and enter into discussions about it when he has been gone for TWO YEARS. I complain about TO, because it's the off-season and the draft hasn't happened and Garrett is still here, especially after such a horrid season. If Garret deserves a chance because of poor production one year, then why shouldn't TO?ANd I hope TO absolutely lights up the league next year. He is a good guy overall. He's egotistical, but so is pretty much every player in the league.

 

[peplaw06]

Oh, you read it for your sure... I especially like the lame attempt at referencing kindergarten and following it up with 'blah blah blah'. It must suck to be owned by a person that didn't pay big bucks to go to law school to learn how to argue.

Part of knowing how to argue includes leaving the nutjobs alone when they start rambling with no coherent points.

And no I didn't read it. I probably wouldn't bother anyway, but since you apparently don't know how to use the quote function and don't know what a paragraph is, that just makes it easier to bypass the crazy you spewed on the screen there.

 

[khiladi]

Part of knowing how to argue includes leaving the nutjobs alone when they start rambling with no coherent points.



And no I didn't read it. I probably wouldn't bother anyway, but since you apparently don't know how to use the quote function and don't know what a paragraph is, that just makes it easier to bypass the crazy you spewed on the screen there.

And yet... The irony though is you don't leave me alone. You keep following me. I admire your latest attempt at trying to redeem yourself by focusing on attacking things like grammar and punctuation. What next to demonstrate more ownage? Besides the fact I already mentioned 'proxy server', of which you probably have no clue about so I'll forgive you on it, seriously, tell me how it feels to realize that you got owned by a guy that didn't pay big money to go to law school to learn how to argue? You enter a thread trying to call me out, with some sarcastic jabs at me, and then you get owned. What does it feel like?

 

[Arch Stanton]

touche

 

[dcfanatic]

I miss Terrell Owens. I really do.

 

[Dave_in-NC]

I know you didn't say TO wasn't arguing his contract. I said it, because it was a totally different context between Philly and Dallas. Further, there is no evidence that TO fought with players like he did in Philly. The only way you can justify your position that it was different is by operating under the assumption that our players 'took the high road' and didn't actually like him. Your basing everything on "I'm sure". This isn't substantiated and to further complement the point, Jerry himself said he didn't consult any players about releasing TO, Tony Romo included. Cowboys players have all come out and supported Owens, whether before the release, during the period of silence and eve after the release. The only thing TO can legitimately be called out for is calling out Garrett, but he is no different than countless players, among them Clinton Portis who blasted Zorn. Garrett flat-out was stinking up the joint. Further, Romo called Garrett out to and so did Roy Williams. And as far as Parcells, you missed the point. Why are you whining that he isn't here anymore and defending him on this forum, when it's been two years? Why not go root for Miami?

Ok he's a great guy who people get tired of real quick. That always happens to great guys. You win.

 

[DallasEast]

"The point is that he wasn't interviewing for the same job that he currently had. It was for a promotion. He already has a job... one that he wasn't released from. And we decided to eat a multi-million dollar cap hit, just so we could get rid of TO. It cost us money to cut him. Garrett on the other hand, it costs us money to keep him."Interesting... I made the point, and your telling me what my point was? Let me make it easier for you. What does the decision of the Buffalo Bills have to do with why we kept or released TO? Absolutely nothing. What does the decision of the Detroit Lions or the Saint Louis Rams rejecting Garrett have to do with the Dallas Cowboys? Absolutely nothing. You said the only team that allegedly wanted TO was the Buffalo Bills, which says a lot about him. But guess what? The Detroit Lions rejected Jason Garrett. The Saint Louis Rams rejected Garrett. These pitiful organizations rejected Garrett. As I said, your logic sucks. I own you."A proper analogy would be if TO were interviewing for a job that he wasn't previously doing.... Or say if Garrett had been fired and he didn't get any offers for Offensive Coordinator positions except from one team in Canada. But it's not the same. Therefore your comparison is ********."Sorry. it doesn't work that way. You can't tell me how to make an analogy, of which I am very well aware of. I explicitly defined the terms of my analogy, which were valid terms, before you even opened up your mouth. I was comparing the 'prestigious nature of the organization' that TO went to with the 'prestigious nature of the organizations' that rejected Garrett. It isn't that complex, but I'm sure you knew that. Your just trying to weasle yourself out of your own jumping the gun yet again. I'm obviously in your head for you to go to such absurd lengths to make such a useless point. "I said by all accounts.... meaning all reports were that there weren't any other teams interested. You got some evidence that he got other offers? What does this have to do with the topic at hand.... That being your comparison of Garrett's situation to TO is worthless. Oh I know. You endlessly feel the need to prop up your hero. When can we expect you to leave this board and go to the Buffalo one? I love it when people declare themselves the winner, especially when they have no idea what the debate is about" What evidence do you have that he didn't get any offers? Oh yeah, you didn't. According to TOs agent, he had more than one suitor. He further got a high-paying job, more money that he was actually going to make in Dallas. It is no coincidence that you just avoided the fact that two younger receivers, Torry Holt and Marvin Harrison are still out of a job, despite being younger than TO and lesser of a 'cancer'. I don't have to procialm myself a winner, when it is obvious I am the winner. The thing you seem to have a hard time grasping is, theer was no debate. I made an analogy which you can't refute. If people say TO could only get a job with a pathetic organization such as Buffalo, than what does that say for Garrett as a coach, who got rejected by the Lions and Rams? The analogy is based upon 'pathetic organizations refusing or taking a person for a job'. There is no debate about it. The analogy isn't set by the terms you are now trying to define them in, to weasle yourself out of your own embarassing ability to not make a sound argument. Face it, the only thing you can say is things like "In your eyes, Garrett started WW2, yada, yada, yada". "My only point in this is to tell you how bad your comparison of Garrett's situation to TO's is. LOL... again declaring yourself the winner. I don't see anyone else agreeing with you. Yeah you've proven that Captain hurry up offense.... Tell everyone again how we were always running the hurry up while letting the play clock run down to 5 seconds or less on every play. Typical... You've admitted you have an agenda against Garrett. Anyone who disagrees with you must be a Garrett Homer. Again, love that logic. Bet you won a lot of arguments over play doh in kindergarten last year."It's obvious I'm in your head, that is why you follow me around. It is obvious I agitated you in that discussion and beat you silly, that is why you follow me around. It is obvious that your trying to regain your ego by trying to project that the sum and substance of my argument was allegedly that we always run the ball down to 5 seconds or less on every play. Don't need to remind you that I simply destroyed you when I brought up the fact that we went five 3 and outs from quarters 2 and 3, with an additional 2 4 and outs during that game. But I'm not going to cycle it for you. I don't need people to agree with me, maybe like you do, to give you some soret of seld-assurance. It is obvious who is playing the role of a person in kindergarden. It definitely isn't me. Just own up to it. Ever since that discussion on Garrett, where I owned you, I've been in your head.

A boat...
A cloud...
A dog...
An airplane...

Okay, that's all I can make out. My eyes are killing me now.

 

[5Stars]

A boat...
A cloud...
A dog...
An airplane...

Okay, that's all I can make out. My eyes are killing me now.

I see a garbage can with trash spilling out...literally.