t.o vs moss??

9xxx11

Member
Messages
172
Reaction score
0
dont know if its a repost.. i watched this on nfl.com, and i disagree i think if we didnt have t.o we would be alright, i mean if terry was healthy we probaly would be in the same position we are today.. im not saying we dont need t.o but look at last year, its not all up to T.O the whole team got better...kinda lost??!! see link...http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80458f5f:starspin :starspin :starspin :starspin :starspin
 
T.O. is a major part of our offense.

Defenses account for Terry Glenn but they fear Terrell Owens.

Terrell Owens goes down, this offense is going to skip a beat, with or without Glenn.

He is not as valuable as Tony Romo but he is pretty dang close.

Pray this guy doesn't get hurt, he is THAT valuable to this team and allows us to have some of that swagger that we have.
 
Randy Moss is better than T.O...but you could argue who is more valuable.
 
9xxx11;1780208 said:
dont know if its a repost.. i watched this on nfl.com, and i disagree i think if we didnt have t.o we would be alright, i mean if terry was healthy we probaly would be in the same position we are today.. im not saying we dont need t.o but look at last year, its not all up to T.O the whole team got better...kinda lost??!! see link...http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80458f5f:starspin :starspin :starspin :starspin :starspin


TO is a 2 game swing minimum.

We lose Washington game without him.... probably 2nd game vs Giants.


But yeah, you can disagree... but you would be wrong.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,012
Messages
14,506,519
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top