Thought this deserved its own thread.
Interesting to see they increased run blitzes by 14% over their normal rate.
Thought this deserved its own thread.
Interesting to see they increased run blitzes by 14% over their normal rate.
You mean to tell me the GM hasn't selected players to turn to when a team blitzes 45% of the time?This is what all defenses see when they play Dallas. Slow RB, slow QB, Slow TE, average speed for WR1+2. There's no threat of a big mistake by the defense because Dallas has only 1 burner on their roster and he's a 150lb WR4.
And yet they have a top 5 offense, with a 32 ranked defense.This is what all defenses see when they play Dallas. Slow RB, slow QB, Slow TE, average speed for WR1+2. There's no threat of a big mistake by the defense because Dallas has only 1 burner on their roster and he's a 150lb WR4.
It's how I'd attack until they prove they can handle it.A lot of nfl teams, def coor won't just let Dak sit back and add up yards to CD & pickens.....
I'd expect more until they defeat high blitz rates consistently
A run blitz is not attacking Dak.A lot of nfl teams, def coor won't just let Dak sit back and add up yards to CD & pickens.....
I'd expect more until they defeat high blitz rates consistently
I do remember lots of past threads and stats to support this.but I thought Dak was elite against the blitz...
Just goes to show ya.....stats are liars .And yet they have a top 5 offense, with a 32 ranked defense.
No. Dallas WON'T run the ball. NOT can't. The problem is the high number of empty set/no back alignment shotgun formations on 3rd and 2 or 3. The same type of nonsense we've seen before.Smart move by the Bucs. Dallas really cant run the ball well and if you capitalize on that with the blitz throws off the timing of the offense. Dak had very poor footwork and it impacted his accuracy negatively.
Thought this deserved its own thread.
Interesting to see they increased run blitzes by 14% over their normal rate.
Williams has a 3.7 YPC average, those are poor numbers in todays league. He can punch it in the endzone but the run game needs a speed element which we sorely lack. Shottenheimer has no clue what he is doing. The sooner we get rid of him the better this team will be for it.No. Dallas WON'T run the ball. NOT can't. The problem is the high number of empty set/no back alignment shotgun formations on 3rd and 2 or 3. The same type of nonsense we've seen before.
Ask yourself why in the hell you have THREE big WRs who have great RAC are instead being run on so many "go to the buick" vertical routes and not more horizontal concepts aimed at getting them the ball in space. Schottenheimer has turned Williams into a glorified blocking dummy...which also limits Prescott's options for underneath check down options when the blitz comes.
He had poor footwork because his play-caller kept putting him in horrible positions all night. How about we not ask him to throw a ball 20 - 25 yards to convert a 3rd and 2 or 3? Maybe run the ball behind Guyton and Smith.
Schottenheimer made his own offense "feast or famine" Thursday night.
It just a thing to check on the way to the Qb.A run blitz is not attacking Dak.
I don't buy this...at all. Guyton and Smith are not scrubs in the running game. I think they ran left just four or five times against the Bucs. Again, why shotgun empty or no back alignments on 3rd and 2/3? I don't believe for one second that the Cowboys can't run. I believe they can't run because they are more focused with getting the ball to their big receivers. That's what three hours spent with the all-22 looks like to me. There were very few horizontal routes run in that game. From the start it was a failed game plan. Vertical routes with nothing underneath to break the pressure. Williams was nothing but a blocking dummy in that game.Williams has a 3.7 YPC average, those are poor numbers in todays league. He can punch it in the endzone but the run game needs a speed element which we sorely lack. Shottenheimer has no clue what he is doing. The sooner we get rid of him the better this team will be for it.
