Technically we're picking 9th

uh we are picking 14th, if Luke Kuechly is still not picked by then, he will be the BPA on the board
 
The only thing you can say right now is that there are 13 picks before the Cowboys pick with two of those picks already set. The Colts will take Luck and the Commanders will take RG3. Beyond that, you cannot count on anything.

Even if the Vikings announce early who they will pick at #3, you cannot count on it because if another team is desperate enough, they may way overpay to move up to that spot.

There is also a good chance that Jerry will trade up or down (more likely) depending on which players get picked before the Cowboys pick comes up.

#reality
 
RoyTheHammer;4467281 said:
If you try to understand what he was trying to point out, rather than taking every word he said too literally, it makes for much better discussion. Rather than just try to call him on what he said and make him look stupid.

I am taking him by what he's saying. He's wrong and you're wrong too. Whether there's an immediate need is completely irrelevant when stacking your board.

Unless you're stacking your draft board per needs. Which would be idiotic.
 
Disturbed;4467269 said:
I hope Jerrah just takes DeCastro at 14....don't trade down and screw it up. Jerrah sometimes likes to wheel and deal too much -- don't take the risk and please take the best option.

DeCastro will be a very good player for a long time. Selecting him will help the Cowboys right away and maybe we can stop complaining about he line for a change.

with our activity in FA, isnt that a signal that we are looking elsewhere in the draft besides OG? with Nagy, Costa, Kowalski, Livings, and Bernadeau added to the roster.
 
While i agree that Decasto would be the best pick as far as needs go. There is something about Upshaw that makes me really want this kid, he is going to be a playmaker!!!
 
Risen Star;4467292 said:
I am taking him by what he's saying. He's wrong and you're wrong too. Whether there's an immediate need is completely irrelevant when stacking your board.

Unless you're stacking your draft board per needs. Which would be idiotic.

I don't think he even mentioned draft boards at all.. all he's trying to say is there are 5 guys who are pretty much guarenteed to go top 10. If you go by that, we have the 9th pick of the other guys. That's all he was saying. Not something that people need to get all snarky about. Literally every reply is someone just being a jerk to the guy. What's the point of acting like that?
 
RoyTheHammer;4467281 said:
If you try to understand what he was trying to point out, rather than taking every word he said too literally, it makes for much better discussion. Rather than just try to call him on what he said and make him look stupid.

dont worry about it Roy, i'm glad you saw my point, and yes we're picking 14th, i never said we werent, but in my opinion we arent getting the 14th best player according to our needs and wants.
 
RoyTheHammer;4467301 said:
I don't think he even mentioned draft boards at all.. all he's trying to say is there are 5 guys who are pretty much guarenteed to go top 10. If you go by that, we have the 9th pick of the other guys. That's all he was saying. Not something that people need to get all snarky about. Literally every reply is someone just being a jerk to the guy. What's the point of acting like that?

He said since we don't need a QB, RB or WR, we're esentially getting at least the 9th best player in the draft.

That simply is an incorrect statement.
 
So much negativity on this board :laugh2:

He is just saying that some teams pretty much are picking players that we are not gonna even think about picking. Which will leave a certain amount of guys for us to pick form.
 
CowboyChris33;4467302 said:
dont worry about it Roy, i'm glad you saw my point, and yes we're picking 14th, i never said we werent, but in my opinion we arent getting the 14th best player according to our needs and wants.

I understood what you were trying to say, even if the wording was a little fuzzy.. there's no need to respond if its just going to be some snarky comment that was already said 20 times in the thread. Some people just look for stuff to argue or poo poo on. Don't worry about it. I agree we'll be getting a good player, and i doubt we'd even consider a player like Tannenhill, even if his value is around 14.. but there are probably about 5 guys who are almost guarentees to go in the top 10 picks, so your point does make some sense, in that we won't even have a chance at them.
 
Risen Star;4467305 said:
He said since we don't need a QB, RB or WR, we're esentially getting at least the 9th best player in the draft.

That simply is an incorrect statement.

Dude just give it up quit trying " to be the smart guy" your just being a jerk and got called out on it.
 
:hammer:
Disturbed;4467269 said:
I hope Jerrah just takes DeCastro at 14....don't trade down and screw it up. Jerrah sometimes likes to wheel and deal too much -- don't take the risk and please take the best option.

DeCastro will be a very good player for a long time. Selecting him will help the Cowboys right away and maybe we can stop complaining about he line for a change.
 
I think everybody knew what he was saying..just a boring Sunday I guess...sorry OP don't take it personal, you just got welcomed in a CZ sort of way..keep your posts coming man
 
cowboy_ron;4467325 said:
I think everybody knew what he was saying..just a boring Sunday I guess...sorry OP don't take it personal, you just got welcomed in a CZ sort of way..keep your posts coming man

The "CZ Way".. where everybody thinks they know more than the person above and below them in the thread and has to condescend and poo poo on everything they don't completely agree with.. even some things they do completely agree with, but think should be said in a different way.
 
Technically you are right and here is 9 players that most would be happy with.

Coples
Ingram
Brockers
Poe
Cox
DeCastro
Barron
Mercilus
Upshaw


BOOO-YAAAS!!!
 
RoyTheHammer;4467301 said:
I don't think he even mentioned draft boards at all.. all he's trying to say is there are 5 guys who are pretty much guarenteed to go top 10. If you go by that, we have the 9th pick of the other guys. That's all he was saying. Not something that people need to get all snarky about. Literally every reply is someone just being a jerk to the guy. What's the point of acting like that?

I know right... Some people always try to act like a smart
 
SilverStarCowboy;4467367 said:
Technically you are right and here is 9 players that most would be happy with.

Coples
Ingram
Brockers
Poe
Cox
DeCastro
Barron
Mercilus
Upshaw


BOOO-YAAAS!!!

not brockers or Poe - either one of them
 
CowboyChris, I got your point. Thanks for the thread topic. Long ago, I learned to not offer an opinion if another person's feelings might be hurt while doing so. It's called decorum. It's okay to not respond to threads when we disagree with them. But way too frequently here, some are willing to pounce at the first opportunity.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,008
Messages
14,506,245
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top