mickgreen58;1861190 said:Again Iceberg, this isn't just any Wide Receiver, this is arguably our best and most consistent receiver last year.
Why in the world would you relegate a weapon like that to Spot Duty?
peplaw06;1861234 said:He's been around the team, I don't see how Garrett has anything to do with it. He knows the offense. If your main concern is getting him some "bumps and bruises," just have him go through contact drills at practice.
And what's the alternative? Send him out there regardless of the conditions and risk it even more than he would be by playing in perfect conditions?
Add in the fact that we don't know how long Romo will play, if at all. He definitely doesn't need game work with Brad Johnson.
All I'm saying is Glenn's the ultimate professional. He'll be prepared no matter what game is his first one.
YoMick;1861253 said:BUT... the bottom line - GLENN probably NEEDS REAL GAME TIME PLAYING TIME as opposed to NOT NEEDING IT.
If Terry plays, he's only going to get 10 to 20 snaps anyway. I think we'll see both. I hope that they don't hold him out because of the rain. They can make him active and just use him selectively, to get him in rhythm. Remember, this is a new offense for him.Eddie;1861177 said:Better safe than sorry. I'd like to see Stanback out there anyway.
iceberg;1861252 said:mick - thanks for asking vs. going the ROFL route that the 'beatiful posters' resort to when they disagree. : )
i give him spot duty and ramp up. if he can play, his playing time will increase. i'd just not throw *any* WR back into a full force fire after being out the entire season due to an injury that kept nagging his rehab.
start off slowly and build up as he can take it. if he can't, back off. that's all.
YoMick;1861253 said:I really love your matter of fact OPINION posts.
BUT... the bottom line - GLENN probably NEEDS REAL GAME TIME PLAYING TIME as opposed to NOT NEEDING IT.
mickgreen58;1861265 said:NP.
This is a message board, so just because someone disagrees with my opinion, doesn't mean they are wrong, at least 1% of the time :laugh2: .
I don't know if they will just throw the guy into the fire. I personally think you see some Multiple Receiver sets and Glenn runs a good deal of Decoy routes.
I think his playing time will increase incrementally if he plays well.
YoMick;1861253 said:I really love your matter of fact OPINION posts.
BUT... the bottom line - GLENN probably NEEDS REAL GAME TIME PLAYING TIME as opposed to NOT NEEDING IT.
Thehoofbite;1861288 said:No doubt he needs real game time. However, there is also no doubt that when he is ready to go, you put him out there.
If not, how does he get real game time? Hope for a blow out or wait until next year?
I'd have no problem with Glenn going out there on the 1st down in the playoffs if he didn't play this week. The simple fact that he is there completely changes how teams defend the Cowboys. And if it doesn't, easy yards and points going to TG.
YoMick;1861253 said:I really love your matter of fact OPINION posts.
BUT... the bottom line - GLENN probably NEEDS REAL GAME TIME PLAYING TIME as opposed to NOT NEEDING IT.
peplaw06;1861340 said:What are we even arguing about in this thread. It's obvious we want him to get time. But to what end? I don't think anyone's saying start him this week and give him 100% of the snaps. If we put him out there in bad conditions, the risk is he reinjures himself. If we don't risk it, he has more rehab time... what's wrong with that?
He's probably NOT going to be the starter in the first playoff game even if he gets some work in this game.
So where do we disagree?
peplaw06;1861195 said:I think you overestimate the importance of game time with Glenn.
peplaw06;1861195 said:He's a vet who is the epitome of a professional. He knows there's a difference, but he's been there before,
peplaw06;1861195 said:and I'm sure his practice regimen includes as close to a game simulation as he can get.
peplaw06;1861195 said:How long did it take Greg Ellis to be a beast when he came back from injury?