Love this thread. Icould talk this type stuff all night.
Really liked the 46 in the 80's
1) Loved the three true lineman covering the C and 2 G's it just caused havoc. You know the Eagles use to run this with Reggie at the NT so he couldn't be double. What a nightmare.
2) Eight men in the box with this allignment forced most teams to abandon the running game. And most teams in the 80's just couldn't do it.
You guys remember the one team that ran very effectively against the 46.
They did to the Bears and the Eagles all thoughout the 80's
The freaking Commanders. Gibbs and that counter tray used to eat up the 46. That 2 TE offense with the weakside OT and OG pulling and the rest of the lineman blocking down. They used to kill it every time.
The 46 as it was run in the 80's just doesn't work today for alot of reasons already covered. But what it really comes down to is that passing games are more precise today and teams don't rely on there running games like they use to.
With that said I still think it can be useful in spots. I actually think your average 3-4 base team is better equipped to slip into and out of this defense.
The 3 lineman of the 3-4 are a perfect fit for the interior three of the 46. Most weakside 3-4 LBs like Ware would fit nicely into the weakside DE role.
Come to think of it our Cowboys might be the best equipped team to do this. I love Ellis as the week side end and ROY as the SS/LB.