3. That's the key to beating anybody. Running the ball and playing good defense. But that type of football has been deemed outdated. Now if your a powerhouse passing team fine, but everyone doesn't have the personnel to do that. Some Teams don't have the QB, some teams don't have the receivers, most don't have the Offensive line.
Well, there has been the rise of the pass-happy team. However, it depends on having an elite quarterback. As you correctly point out, not everyone has one. I personally find that approach unsustainable. Not everyone can have a Payton Manning -- and how many Super Bowls did he win anyway? He won two, and the one he won with the Broncos was not on that type of team. By the time Manning was with the Broncos, he was not the elite QB that he once was.
...
So while I wouldn't call it the blueprint for beating absolutely anyone, I do think you're onto something. I think the ball-control/good defense type of team is back on the rise. It's easy to find a competent running back, but super hard to find an elite quarterback. Building an overpowering O-line is still not an easy task, but it's more doable than your scheme depending on finding and signing the next Manning.
...
But, yeah, whenever some TV pundit has referred to a ball-control type of approach as "dated," I've thought to myself, "Not as dated as you think it is." IMO, the need to stop a pass-happy team with a defense containing a lot of D-backs isn't going to instantly vanish. However, teams are going to realize that they don't have to find a Dan Marino or a Payton Manning in his prime. If they can run the ball and play excellent defense, they can win with a competent quarterback who doesn't have to pass 40+ times a game.
...
I think, at one point, the sports pundits were predicting that "pass-happy" would so catch on that everyone would be doing it, and that style of play would take over for good. However, I think coaches are going to realize, "If I pass 40 plus times per game, my quarterback throws a pick right when it destroys our chance to win." If you've got the ball control/good defense thing down, you can win with a Mark Rypien kind of quarterback, and you don't need a Dan Marino.