The Cowboys couldn't ask for a better opportunity

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
This offseason is like finding 20 forgotten bucks in your jeans pocket, or a well-timed snow day when you didn't crack a book. It doesn't happen like this very often.

The Cowboys are pretty good, if they weren't so fatally flawed. Teams don't win Super Bowls with craptastic offensive lines and no pass rush, no matter how many heads they can turn with pretty paint jobs and flashy rims in the downtown lights.

And don't look now - actually, do look by all means - but the football stars have aligned, almost perfectly, to give Dallas the quick fix it so desperately needs.

The draft is dripping with guards and tackles. GOOD guards and tackles. It's got defensive lineman and safeties, too, in greater numbers than usual. If your team needs a quarterback, receiver, running back, or corner, this isn't your draft. That was last year. Those teams are facing riskier propositions.

This is like recovering a fumble on the first series of the 2013 season for Dallas, and it's a good thing because other alternatives are scarce, if not impossible. Salary cap woes make free agent options slim to none, particularly with tough decisions on homegrown players looming. Jerry's shell-game economics continue to haunt, and will for foreseeable seasons. Can't swim in those waters.

But a couple shrewd picks in the first three rounds could fix the offensive line. It doesn't take five studs to block and protect well, but it takes more than Tyron and the Backstreet Boys to move the ball in Green Bay on a windy January day.

Dallas has to get this right. The first-rounder needs to be an immediate-impact star player, and rounds two and three have to be longtime core contributors. I'd like two offensive lineman and a safety, but whatever. As long as it works.

The 4-3, Kiffin, and Marinelli should be able to instantly upgrade the pass rush with the players on hand. Get Ware (and maybe Spencer) out of pass coverage in the name of all that is holy, please. Get Ratliff off the nose. A draft pick here wouldn't hurt either, but I'm hopeful this has been as much a scheme problem as anything. Teams have learned to get our pass rushers out of pass rushing in the 3-4.

I've maintained that, amidst all the frustrating madness of the past two seasons, there has been a plan. One that wasn't there before. The roster has been purged of old fogies and malcontents, and it's now ripened with solutions to problems. Just not enough solutions yet, until September, once this final offseason of rebuilding is complete.

Say what you will about Garrett, he's quite the trooper. Imagine being a Princeton-educated former NFL quarterback having to bite your lip every time your outhouse-educated hayseed of an accidental owner wanders off the reservation in a drunken rant. Most prideful men, which Garrett is, couldn't swallow their irritation and press on. That's good on Garrett.

So what's left is to hope Jerry will stay out of the cookie aisle, and let the football people go buy the peas and carrots this team needs in the draft. In another bit of good luck, Jerry and Stephen are going to be wrapped up in Romo extensions and Spencer decisions for at least the early part of the process. Here's hoping for a cantakerous negotiation or two on a Monster truck or MMA event that will keep him occupied further.

There is that nagging detail of making sure you get the picks right. Will the two lineman and safety be closer to Larry Allen, Erik Williams, and Darren Woodson....or Stephen Peterman, Jacob Rogers, and Tony Dixon. The latter actually represents the higher draft picks, stunningly.

But recent drafting and roster management have me, for one, hopeful. If Jerry's recent temper tantrum, which I no longer believe effects the players much in his elderly condition, is winding down as it appears, then everybody can get back to solving real football-player problems.

The draft is begging Dallas to address its remaining needs. The solution is no longer full of longshots and Elmer's glue. Important pieces are in place, and they're young. The future should be absolutely bright, next year and beyond.

They'd better not screw it up.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,981
Reaction score
48,728
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Thanks
I enjoyed that type of write-up for a change.

The opportunity is there, no doubt.
 

Zimmy Lives

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,165
Reaction score
4,631
I would not be disappointed if Dallas' first three picks in April were linemen -- offense or defense!
 

DCBoysfan

Hardwork and Dedication
Messages
7,278
Reaction score
3,582
Zimmy Lives;5009978 said:
I would not be disappointed if Dallas' first three picks in April were linemen -- offense or defense!

I would love to see that.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,230
Reaction score
20,501
The OP is a good post and sort of brings up an often argued point on this forum which is BPA or drafting for need. Hopefully, the BPA matches up with our needs.

If the best player available is graded as heads and shoulders above everyone else we have on our board, and that player is a receiver, do we take the receiver? The obvious answer is to trade down for a king's ransom so that the team that moves up can get that high value player. But reality is that maybe you can't do that.

Then the issue becomes do you take the highest rated player (receiver) who probably won't see the field, or do you draft the OL/DL that you aren't nearly as high on who has a greater chance of contributing because there is a need at his position, but whose "bust factor" is higher because you already feel like he has less talent?

I hope that the BPA matches up with our needs, but with our luck there will be a guy at #18 who we evaluate as a top 5 player which isn't at a need position. In that event it is a lose/lose proposition because no matter what you do it is wrong.

When you say take that OL/DL instead of best player available ..... think of how badly we whiffed by not taking Randy Moss or trading down instead of selecting Steven Jackson. No the situation isn't exactly the same, but I think you see my underlying point.
 

FLcowboy

When Jerry, when?
Messages
4,061
Reaction score
260
Well, time will tell regarding how well Dallas chooses in the draft, but past history tells me they will draft one person who can't come to the rookie camp because he is still in school, one person who has suffered an injury last season and is still recovering, and yet another person that nobody has ever heard of.

Then there will be the draftee that nobody can figure out why he was drafted, and there you go, maybe three guys who are bonafide. And, one of those will be hurt in camp, and fall behind his developmental schedule.
 

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,722
Reaction score
11,572
totally agree with the original post, don't get distracted Jerry.
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
Excellent job in the OP. I agree with you completely on this deal. I think if they do this right and get the OL and DL help they absolutely need to get, maybe throw a safety in there, in the first four rounds of this draft that this team can be well on its way to being a serious contender to a championship.
 

AKATheRake

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,968
Reaction score
2,963
Pretty much!

It actually may not have been an accident either. We'll know better after the draft.

Teams do speculate a year or 2 ahead at what could be in the draft and FA.

Red's daddy is a scout and this apparently is a process in creating the winning program.

In the NFL, usually a 3 year window is given to create such a program as long as there are signs of progress.

This is year 3 coming as Red being HC and although 2 back to back 8-8 seasons, there's more tangible upside than downside.

Not saying it's fast enough for me, nor couldn't it happen faster with someone else at HC. But the arrow is pointing up and it seems that where we're picking, BPA and what our needs are and how we can fulfill them, seem to coincide with our overall cap situation.
 

yimyammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,574
Reaction score
7,004
makes sense to me which is why they'll probably trade their 1st, 2nd & 3rd round picks to move up and grab a safety
 

BoysFan4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,593
Reaction score
3,510
FLcowboy;5010076 said:
Well, time will tell regarding how well Dallas chooses in the draft, but past history tells me they will draft one person who can't come to the rookie camp because he is still in school, one person who has suffered an injury last season and is still recovering, and yet another person that nobody has ever heard of.

Then there will be the draftee that nobody can figure out why he was drafted, and there you go, maybe three guys who are bonafide. And, one of those will be hurt in camp, and fall behind his developmental schedule.

:lmao:
 

Omegasupreme

Active Member
Messages
336
Reaction score
86
big dog cowboy;5010204 said:
The glass is half full not half empty.

I agree. I still don't think the issue is solely an offensive line talent improvement remedy, because the amount of passes per game and yards amassed, as well as how long Romo had to wait at times speaks to the ability the line had to sustained blocks. Given the amount of passes and the infrequency of the run, there was a lot pressure on that line. And that one facet of the offense that Jason emphasized or Romo was lured into, did very well.

So in optimism, if anything else about the offense gets added, scoring should follow.

The defense is also going to be equally exciting.

My favorite line in the OP was this: "...every time your outhouse-educated hayseed of an accidental owner wanders off the reservation in a drunken rant."

That's good stuff.
 

Beast_from_East

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,140
Reaction score
27,231
FLcowboy;5010076 said:
Well, time will tell regarding how well Dallas chooses in the draft, but past history tells me they will draft one person who can't come to the rookie camp because he is still in school, one person who has suffered an injury last season and is still recovering, and yet another person that nobody has ever heard of.

Then there will be the draftee that nobody can figure out why he was drafted, and there you go, maybe three guys who are bonafide. And, one of those will be hurt in camp, and fall behind his developmental schedule.


Yea, past history of drafting does not fill me with a lot of confidence. However, it does seem like the last couple of drafts have been better so I guess we shall see.
 

SWG9

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,040
Reaction score
185
Verdict;5010075 said:
The OP is a good post and sort of brings up an often argued point on this forum which is BPA or drafting for need. Hopefully, the BPA matches up with our needs.

If the best player available is graded as heads and shoulders above everyone else we have on our board, and that player is a receiver, do we take the receiver? The obvious answer is to trade down for a king's ransom so that the team that moves up can get that high value player. But reality is that maybe you can't do that.

Then the issue becomes do you take the highest rated player (receiver) who probably won't see the field, or do you draft the OL/DL that you aren't nearly as high on who has a greater chance of contributing because there is a need at his position, but whose "bust factor" is higher because you already feel like he has less talent?

I hope that the BPA matches up with our needs, but with our luck there will be a guy at #18 who we evaluate as a top 5 player which isn't at a need position. In that event it is a lose/lose proposition because no matter what you do it is wrong.

When you say take that OL/DL instead of best player available ..... think of how badly we whiffed by not taking Randy Moss or trading down instead of selecting Steven Jackson. No the situation isn't exactly the same, but I think you see my underlying point.

I completely disagree. The right thing to do, 100 times out of 100, is to take the top 5 player. That's an absolute dream come true and I could only wish Dallas winds up in that situation this year (and yes, if that means Matt Barkley becomes a Cowboy, so be it)

As tempting as it is, reaching for players or passing on top end talent due to need is a surefire way to wreck your franchise.
 

Ren

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,218
Reaction score
1,944
BraveHeartFan;5010163 said:
Excellent job in the OP. I agree with you completely on this deal. I think if they do this right and get the OL and DL help they absolutely need to get, maybe throw a safety in there, in the first four rounds of this draft that this team can be well on its way to being a serious contender to a championship.

There's also FA if we free up some cap space, if we could come up with a couple of starters on our OL, a DE to replace Spencer and a safety i'd love our chances to contend this year
 

Apollo Creed

Stackin and Processin, Well
Messages
9,027
Reaction score
1,223
Solid work man, you're much better than a lot of the DFW area guys that just hurry through color by numbers articles.

A lot of guys/gals on this board are.
 
Top