cnuball21
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 13,220
- Reaction score
- 11,177
Look, you take a WR in that situation if he's the clear best player on your board. The Lamb situation seems like a good comp. I don't think we wanted to take a WR there but he was very high on our board and when he fell, it was a no brainer.
But if you have, say Burks or Olave as the 11th name on your board and Kenyon Green as 12 on your board, and both are available, you take Green.
I agree to an extent, but the problem is there isn’t anyone of Lambs caliber in this class. He would’ve comfortably been WR1 in this class.
So now we’re talking about 3/4 WRs going ahead of us, bc they’re always overdrafted, then we’re taking WR5/6 in a class that is weak at the top?
Dumb, dumb, dumb…