abersonc;2127665 said:
Johnson had a passer rating of 79.9 in the playoffs the year he won the SB.
Dilfer had a playoff PR of 83.7 the year he won the SB
Grossman had a playoff PR of 73.2 the year the Bears went to the SB.
Manning, had a 95.8 PR in the playoffs last year.
Folks, you can keep throwing out the "but so and so went to the SB" lines but Manning clearly outperformed those guys. You can continue to lump him in with the Johnsons, the Dilfers, and even the Grossmans. But know that you'll be doing so with no support for such reasoning.
Manning, in the play-offs in 2008 , threw for 185 yards, 163 yards, 254 yards and 255 yards in the play-offs. When he threw for 254 yards and 255 yards, he had around a 53 percent completion average. And he threw for 40 times in one of those games. His ratings in those games were 72.3 and 87.3.
His play-off ratings were skewed by his first two games, when he threw plenty of check-downs and threw very little. He had a 117 and 132 PR in those games. The Dallas game, he had only two worthy drives, and one of those drives, 40 of those yards came on a busted play by Henry.
When the ball is in Mannings hand, and he is forced to make a play, he is just where the other QBs are at. He had a sure interception dorpped by Samuels on the last drive and a spectacular catch by Tyree to jump his numbers up in the last game, otherwise his numbers would have been a lot worse.
The fact that there is even a debate about Romo and Eli is absurd. Individually, if it weren't for Brady having an all-world year, Romo would look even more impressive. Romo's play was almost unprecedented statistically and ranks up there with the greats in his first full season.