The Relationship Between Cowboys Drafting Success and Head Coaches

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
How much influence did Cowboy Head Coaches actually have when it comes to the draft?

I beleive it varies according to the Head Coach, his reputation, and the circumstances surrounding his hiring.

To get a better understanding of a HC's contributions in acquiring talent I have devloped a statistical program that ranks the collective drafts during each of the past four HC's tenure. The periods cover the 2000 through the 2015 seasons. These ranks are based on how the draft classes performed as compared to other teams in the NFL for those particular drafts.

Now, what do I mean by "performed"? That is, what criteria do I use when evaluating a group of drafts. Certainly, there will be disagreements on exactly how you rate a draft.

What I did was each draft is assigned a value that is based equally on the combination of Pro Bowl selections, number of games players started and number of games played.. I got data from players that are perennial pro bowl selections right down to the players that only played a few downs in one game.

I compare the totals for the other teams during those periods. Each team is ranked from 1 to 32 for each of the three categories. From that, a final score is given. Finally, each team is ranked based on that final score.

What I came up with was pretty much what I expected.

The Cowboys have employed two different types of coaches. The first group are Jerry Jones fill ins, part of the 500 Club, I call them. They would include guys like Barry switzer, Dave Campo, and Wade Phillips. They had verry little influence in deciding the way in which the team would acquire talent although Im sure they were involved in the selection of a particular player to some small degree.

The other group are the real coaches. These are the guys that are here to build a team their way with the kind of guys they want. They don't always get what they want but their influence dominate the decision making. They always come with a specific plan, they are not fill ins to an already successful system. Typically, they have already found success at a different or similar level. These are guys like Jimmy Johnson and Bill Parcells.

What type is Jason Garrett? I think I can demonstrate that with the results I have found. Keep in mind that Jason is the son of a career NFL scout and brother to the guy who was once the Dallas Cowboys Director of Pro Scouting. He has been anything but a spectator in building this team. he is the main architect.

The Results:


Campo __ . Parcells _ Phillips _ Garrett
2000-2002 _ 2003-2006 _ 2007-2010 _ 2011-2015
Team __ Rank _ Rank _ Rank _ Rank
ARI ___ 6 ___ 3 ___ 26 ___ 10
ATL ___ 24 ___ 21 ___ 10 ___ 25
BAL ___ 4 ___ 7 ___ 8 ___ 9
BUF ___ 13 ___ 26 ___ 16 ___ 5
CAR ___ 2 ___ 12 ___ 3 ___ 21
CHI ___ 17 ___ 11 ___ 24 ___ 23
CIN ___ 7 ___ 15 ___ 17 ___ 6
CLE ___ 22 ___ 24 ___ 18 ___ 11
DAL ___ 25 ___ 1 ___ 20 ___ 7
DEN ___ 19 ___ 27 ___ 15 ___ 13
DET ___ 16 ___ 32 ___ 7 ___ 31
GNB ___ 15 ___ 13 ___ 1 ___ 19
HOU ___ 32 ___ 14 ___ 14 ___ 3
IND ___ 8 ___ 8 ___ 27 ___ 26
JAX ___ 11 ___ 18 ___ 23 ___ 24
KAN ___ 30 ___ 16 ___ 6 ___ 15
MIA ___ 29 ___ 29 ___ 5 ___ 14
MIN ___ 28 ___ 23 ___ 22 ___ 2
NOR ___ 20 ___ 17 ___ 25 ___ 32
NWE ___ 12 ___ 5 ___ 13 ___ 22
NYG ___ 27 ___ 6 ___ 31 ___ 30
NYJ ___ 1 ___ 9 ___ 28 ___ 27
OAK ___ 21 ___ 28 ___ 19 ___ 12
PHI ___ 14 ___ 25 ___ 9 ___ 18
PIT ___ 3 ___ 20 ___ 4 ___ 28
SDG ___ 10 ___ 2 ___ 32 ___ 29
SEA ___ 5 ___ 22 ___ 11 ___ 1
SFO ___ 9 ___ 4 ___ 2 ___ 20
STL ___ 23 ___ 19 ___ 29 ___ 4
TAM ___ 31 ___ 31 ___ 21 ___ 16
TEN ___ 18 ___ 10 ___ 12 ___ 17
WAS ___ 26 ___ 30 ___ 30 ___ 8

(Sorry about the krappee formatting)

Dave Campo - During Campo's time as a HC, the drafting was ....well,....really really bad. They were ranked 25th out of 32 teams. The only thing that kept out of the absolute bottom was the fact that they had two perennial Pro Bowlers in Andre Gurode and safety Roy Williams. Other than that, it was a desert. They were in 31st place for totals games played in and 27th in total starts. Not much productivity here.

Bill Parcells - Say what you will about his style and his attitude but this guy knew talent. Of course, it's not like he didn't have his busts, and there is his opposition to the Ware selection, every HC is going to have his misses, heck, Jimmy didn't want to draft Emmitt Smith but was convinced by a scout at the last minute. However the guys that the Cowboys picked up during his tenure played a lot of football. For the 4 years that Parcells helped with the "grocery shopping", the Cowboys were ranked #1 in the league in their pick's productivity. Not only did the Cowboys reach the top draftwise, but we aren't even including the rookie free agent finds like Pro Bowlers Miles Austin, Matt McBriar and a certain quarterback. The drafts over that 4 years had 17 players that played in at least 80 games, five full seasons worth. They had the #2 ranking in that category and #3 ranking in starts.

Wade Phillips.- Almost as soon as Parcells hit the door the draft quality began to slide towards the bottom. The team was ranked 20th during the Phillips years, 2007 through 2010, Phillips was the HC during that last draft. They ranked 26th in games started. The 2008 and 2010 drafts were respectable with guys like Sean Lee, Dez Bryant, Martellus Bennett, Mike Jenkins and Orlando Scandrick. The 2009 draft was horrendous. Twelve players chosen as Jerry Jones kept trading down for more picks. The 8 players chosen before the 6th round started a total of 8 games. Three of the remaining 4 didn't start a single game.

Jason Garrett - 7th place among the 32 teams in drafting quality. Obviously, this is the least experienced group which means they still have the most football to play. I wouldn't be surprised if this group reaches #1 in the league. Jason Garrett has put his stamp on the drafts, particularly the first two drafts, 2011 and 2012. I suspect his influence has declined slightly due to Jerry Jones's re-emergence in the decision making. He was particularly quiet, or as quiet as he is capable, after the firing of Phillips. You could tell after the infamous Packer "quitters" game that he knew he had screwed up a good team built by Parcells. He was willing, albeit temporarily, to extend some power and authority to Stephen Jones and Jason Garrett. However, once he realized that the team was getting better, he reeled them in so there would be no mistaking who should get the credit. I credit him for some pretty poor draft trade maneuvering in the last two drafts. However, 9 Pro Bowls, a thousand games played and over 500 starts for a group of players, all having 5 years or less experience, is impressive.

To summarize:

There is a definite correlation between the quality of Cowboys drafts and the influence exerted by the Head Coach. The more they are involved in the decision making, implying less for Jones, the better off the draft. And for those of you who may be victims of Jerry's revisionist history, Jimmy Johnson had absolute and full control of personnel decisions while he was there. It was written in his contract. It was why Jerry Jones said he would never extend that power to another Head Coach....unfortunately.

Other observations:

When you look at the time frames on these drafts you can see why certain teams found a lot of success a few years later. For example, the 49ers had great drafts prior to 2011 and built a Super Bowl team. recently, their drafts have dived. This is a direct correlation with the hiring of their current GM. Another failed season and I believe he will be history.

The Ravens and Seahawks had impressive drafting periods prior to 2011 and it shows in their championship appearances. The Commanders and Giants are two of the consistently poor drafting teams in the 21st century.

Carolina is another team that has hit gold with their drafts.

Based on the quality of their recent drafts, the teams most likely to surprise starting this season are the Vikings, Bills, Rams , and Texans. The teams beginning to fade are the Chargers, Saints, Steelers, and Falcons.
 

zrinkill

Cowboy Fan
Messages
49,043
Reaction score
32,549
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Jason would make a good GM ........ he is just to robotic thinking for a head coach.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Wow, dude. This was a lot of work.

The ranking makes intuitive sense, too. I'd have guessed we were at the outer edge of the top ten if your asked me to take a wild stab at it.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,019
Reaction score
22,611
Interesting effort there...I don't blame all success or failure for that matter, on Jerry Jones. He assembles a group for discussion, and listens. The transition with scouting personnel would be an interesting add as well. Thanks for this effort.
 

BigStar

Stop chasing
Messages
11,528
Reaction score
17,081
The team scored on all 3 OL and we got Dez; hard to complain w/that. This wasn't done intentionally as evidenced by draft boards (Shazier over Martin, but that was countered by the great Fred trade down selection) and has worked out wonderfully for the team. Zeke should keep that high rate of success going and the Byron pick was great as well. The depth selections were better this year too; so far it's limited to Crawford and Hitchens but Russell can grow. Even Mo is looking better this year.

Major respect for the effort!
 
Last edited:

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,783
Reaction score
16,658
good post, but as for rising teams or falling you would have to do another one for FA signings.
Den Was 15-13 but just won a SB and was at another one 2 years prior.

I think there are the 2 jones boys, JG, McClay and maybe one other who make up the board, and decide on the picks.
We dont know who Jason wanted or did not want.
you have to credit all 4 of the above for the improved drafting, and I know Romo really wanted frederick, and had a say
in that draft.
Smith was to protect Romo's blind side, and Martin just slipped down, and he was the best player at that point.
Those 3 picks really elevate our draft score, and I think Romo had some influence on those, and also that they
did not plan to pick 3 OL it just worked out like that.

And if you look at the 2nd round picks, and even 3rd round, you have to admit it hasnt been too good.
Also a player playing games and or starting adds to the score, but may be not playing very good.
Like claiborne and others who have played many games, but not been all that good.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,019
Reaction score
22,611
good post, but as for rising teams or falling you would have to do another one for FA signings.
Den Was 15-13 but just won a SB and was at another one 2 years prior.

I think there are the 2 jones boys, JG, McClay and maybe one other who make up the board, and decide on the picks.
We dont know who Jason wanted or did not want.
you have to credit all 4 of the above for the improved drafting, and I know Romo really wanted frederick, and had a say
in that draft.
Smith was to protect Romo's blind side, and Martin just slipped down, and he was the best player at that point.
Those 3 picks really elevate our draft score, and I think Romo had some influence on those, and also that they
did not plan to pick 3 OL it just worked out like that.

And if you look at the 2nd round picks, and even 3rd round, you have to admit it hasnt been too good.
Also a player playing games and or starting adds to the score, but may be not playing very good.
Like claiborne and others who have played many games, but not been all that good.

The rule of thumb for drafts...is 3-5 years down the road. Much is still on the table for now.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
How much influence did Cowboy Head Coaches actually have when it comes to the draft?

I beleive it varies according to the Head Coach, his reputation, and the circumstances surrounding his hiring.

To get a better understanding of a HC's contributions in acquiring talent I have devloped a statistical program that ranks the collective drafts during each of the past four HC's tenure. The periods cover the 2000 through the 2015 seasons. These ranks are based on how the draft classes performed as compared to other teams in the NFL for those particular drafts.

Now, what do I mean by "performed"? That is, what criteria do I use when evaluating a group of drafts. Certainly, there will be disagreements on exactly how you rate a draft.

What I did was each draft is assigned a value that is based equally on the combination of Pro Bowl selections, number of games players started and number of games played.. I got data from players that are perennial pro bowl selections right down to the players that only played a few downs in one game.

I compare the totals for the other teams during those periods. Each team is ranked from 1 to 32 for each of the three categories. From that, a final score is given. Finally, each team is ranked based on that final score.

What I came up with was pretty much what I expected.

The Cowboys have employed two different types of coaches. The first group are Jerry Jones fill ins, part of the 500 Club, I call them. They would include guys like Barry switzer, Dave Campo, and Wade Phillips. They had verry little influence in deciding the way in which the team would acquire talent although Im sure they were involved in the selection of a particular player to some small degree.

The other group are the real coaches. These are the guys that are here to build a team their way with the kind of guys they want. They don't always get what they want but their influence dominate the decision making. They always come with a specific plan, they are not fill ins to an already successful system. Typically, they have already found success at a different or similar level. These are guys like Jimmy Johnson and Bill Parcells.

What type is Jason Garrett? I think I can demonstrate that with the results I have found. Keep in mind that Jason is the son of a career NFL scout and brother to the guy who was once the Dallas Cowboys Director of Pro Scouting. He has been anything but a spectator in building this team. he is the main architect.

The Results:


Campo __ . Parcells _ Phillips _ Garrett
2000-2002 _ 2003-2006 _ 2007-2010 _ 2011-2015
Team __ Rank _ Rank _ Rank _ Rank
ARI ___ 6 ___ 3 ___ 26 ___ 10
ATL ___ 24 ___ 21 ___ 10 ___ 25
BAL ___ 4 ___ 7 ___ 8 ___ 9
BUF ___ 13 ___ 26 ___ 16 ___ 5
CAR ___ 2 ___ 12 ___ 3 ___ 21
CHI ___ 17 ___ 11 ___ 24 ___ 23
CIN ___ 7 ___ 15 ___ 17 ___ 6
CLE ___ 22 ___ 24 ___ 18 ___ 11
DAL ___ 25 ___ 1 ___ 20 ___ 7
DEN ___ 19 ___ 27 ___ 15 ___ 13
DET ___ 16 ___ 32 ___ 7 ___ 31
GNB ___ 15 ___ 13 ___ 1 ___ 19
HOU ___ 32 ___ 14 ___ 14 ___ 3
IND ___ 8 ___ 8 ___ 27 ___ 26
JAX ___ 11 ___ 18 ___ 23 ___ 24
KAN ___ 30 ___ 16 ___ 6 ___ 15
MIA ___ 29 ___ 29 ___ 5 ___ 14
MIN ___ 28 ___ 23 ___ 22 ___ 2
NOR ___ 20 ___ 17 ___ 25 ___ 32
NWE ___ 12 ___ 5 ___ 13 ___ 22
NYG ___ 27 ___ 6 ___ 31 ___ 30
NYJ ___ 1 ___ 9 ___ 28 ___ 27
OAK ___ 21 ___ 28 ___ 19 ___ 12
PHI ___ 14 ___ 25 ___ 9 ___ 18
PIT ___ 3 ___ 20 ___ 4 ___ 28
SDG ___ 10 ___ 2 ___ 32 ___ 29
SEA ___ 5 ___ 22 ___ 11 ___ 1
SFO ___ 9 ___ 4 ___ 2 ___ 20
STL ___ 23 ___ 19 ___ 29 ___ 4
TAM ___ 31 ___ 31 ___ 21 ___ 16
TEN ___ 18 ___ 10 ___ 12 ___ 17
WAS ___ 26 ___ 30 ___ 30 ___ 8

(Sorry about the krappee formatting)

Dave Campo - During Campo's time as a HC, the drafting was ....well,....really really bad. They were ranked 25th out of 32 teams. The only thing that kept out of the absolute bottom was the fact that they had two perennial Pro Bowlers in Andre Gurode and safety Roy Williams. Other than that, it was a desert. They were in 31st place for totals games played in and 27th in total starts. Not much productivity here.

Bill Parcells - Say what you will about his style and his attitude but this guy knew talent. Of course, it's not like he didn't have his busts, and there is his opposition to the Ware selection, every HC is going to have his misses, heck, Jimmy didn't want to draft Emmitt Smith but was convinced by a scout at the last minute. However the guys that the Cowboys picked up during his tenure played a lot of football. For the 4 years that Parcells helped with the "grocery shopping", the Cowboys were ranked #1 in the league in their pick's productivity. Not only did the Cowboys reach the top draftwise, but we aren't even including the rookie free agent finds like Pro Bowlers Miles Austin, Matt McBriar and a certain quarterback. The drafts over that 4 years had 17 players that played in at least 80 games, five full seasons worth. They had the #2 ranking in that category and #3 ranking in starts.

Wade Phillips.- Almost as soon as Parcells hit the door the draft quality began to slide towards the bottom. The team was ranked 20th during the Phillips years, 2007 through 2010, Phillips was the HC during that last draft. They ranked 26th in games started. The 2008 and 2010 drafts were respectable with guys like Sean Lee, Dez Bryant, Martellus Bennett, Mike Jenkins and Orlando Scandrick. The 2009 draft was horrendous. Twelve players chosen as Jerry Jones kept trading down for more picks. The 8 players chosen before the 6th round started a total of 8 games. Three of the remaining 4 didn't start a single game.

Jason Garrett - 7th place among the 32 teams in drafting quality. Obviously, this is the least experienced group which means they still have the most football to play. I wouldn't be surprised if this group reaches #1 in the league. Jason Garrett has put his stamp on the drafts, particularly the first two drafts, 2011 and 2012. I suspect his influence has declined slightly due to Jerry Jones's re-emergence in the decision making. He was particularly quiet, or as quiet as he is capable, after the firing of Phillips. You could tell after the infamous Packer "quitters" game that he knew he had screwed up a good team built by Parcells. He was willing, albeit temporarily, to extend some power and authority to Stephen Jones and Jason Garrett. However, once he realized that the team was getting better, he reeled them in so there would be no mistaking who should get the credit. I credit him for some pretty poor draft trade maneuvering in the last two drafts. However, 9 Pro Bowls, a thousand games played and over 500 starts for a group of players, all having 5 years or less experience, is impressive.

To summarize:

There is a definite correlation between the quality of Cowboys drafts and the influence exerted by the Head Coach. The more they are involved in the decision making, implying less for Jones, the better off the draft. And for those of you who may be victims of Jerry's revisionist history, Jimmy Johnson had absolute and full control of personnel decisions while he was there. It was written in his contract. It was why Jerry Jones said he would never extend that power to another Head Coach....unfortunately.

Other observations:

When you look at the time frames on these drafts you can see why certain teams found a lot of success a few years later. For example, the 49ers had great drafts prior to 2011 and built a Super Bowl team. recently, their drafts have dived. This is a direct correlation with the hiring of their current GM. Another failed season and I believe he will be history.

The Ravens and Seahawks had impressive drafting periods prior to 2011 and it shows in their championship appearances. The Commanders and Giants are two of the consistently poor drafting teams in the 21st century.

Carolina is another team that has hit gold with their drafts.

Based on the quality of their recent drafts, the teams most likely to surprise starting this season are the Vikings, Bills, Rams , and Texans. The teams beginning to fade are the Chargers, Saints, Steelers, and Falcons.

Nicely done on the work load, but your analysis I find a little off.

I dont feel this coincides with the coaches. Its more about who has what power during the tenure of the coach and the influence or lack there of from the scouting department and other outside influences on Jerry such as Stephen Jones and McClay.

Wade had little say so Jones was still calling all the shots. We didnt have a quality scouting departmen and McClay wasnt here yet. Parcells speaks for himself because he had as much influence as anyone but Jimmy. We know Campo had little to nothing.

We also know that although Garrett clearly has more than Wade or Campo, he is still an outsider when it comes to the draft and the war room. Jerry, Stephen, Will McClay clearly have the majority of the say. And I would argue that it was arrival of McClay and not the arrival of Garrett that has had a bigger influence on recent drafts.

And lets be perfectly honest here................outside of 3 successful first round pick Olineman, what has the draft really given us in Garretts tenure? Sean Lee? One great year from Murray? We are still getting next to nothing outside of the first round. And articles have showed that they are in the bottom half of the league in getting talent from mid to late round picks.

Garrett doenst pick the players here. The only other coaches that did in the Jerry era are Jimmy and Parcells.
 
Last edited:

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,316
Reaction score
37,215
It's post like this that make Cowboys Zone my favorite forum.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
The team scored on all 3 OL and we got Dez; hard to complain w/that. This wasn't done intentionally as evidenced by draft boards (Shazier over Martin, but that was countered by the great Fred trade down selection) and has worked out wonderfully for the team. Zeke should keep that high rate of success going and the Byron pick was great as well. The depth selections were better this year too; so far it's limited to Crawford and Hitchens but Russell can grow. Even Mo is looking better this year.

Major respect for the effort!

A couple of things:

-Dez was drafted under Wade
-how do you know that Byron is a great pick?
-How are you analyzing that the depth picks this year are better as well?
 

Plankton

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,258
Reaction score
18,650
Good analysis.

It makes a lot of sense that the coaches that are more ingrained and more invested in the process end up succeeding more than guys who just want to coach the team, and leave the player acquisition portion to someone else. I will be very interested in seeing if they can determine a better way to scout defensive backs, because they have been consistently poor at it. I would also be interested in seeing how they prototype QBs in the scouting process, because that position is misevaluated by the majority of teams.
 

BigStar

Stop chasing
Messages
11,528
Reaction score
17,081
A couple of things:

-Dez was drafted under Wade
-how do you know that Byron is a great pick?
-How are you analyzing that the depth picks this year are better as well?
Wasn't sure about Bryant but didn't feel like looking it up (knew it was in that time range) nd really didn't seem like a JG pick when I typed it but eh. I don't, I just like his potential/flashes his rookie year in coverage (Byron). That is a good catch, how the heck would I know:D; they haven't even played a down yet (but also weren't reaches on general draft player grade) w/trends seen in the past; no Matt Johnson's, passing on RBs when your leading rusher leaves the team, got DL depth etc.

-I still would have made the trade for Lynch or taken Jack if we were down to plan C as was the case after Dodd/Ogbah were taken.
 
Last edited:

BigStar

Stop chasing
Messages
11,528
Reaction score
17,081
Nicely done on the work load, but your analysis I find a little off.

I dont feel this coincides with the coaches. Its more about who has what power during the tenure of the coach and the influence or lack there of from the scouting department and other outside influences on Jerry such as Stephen Jones and McClay.

Wade had little say so Jones was still calling all the shots. We didnt have a quality scouting departmen and McClay wasnt here yet. Parcells speaks for himself because he had as much influence as anyone but Jimmy. We know Campo had little to nothing.

We also know that although Garrett clearly has more than Wade or Campo, he is still an outsider when it comes to the draft and the war room. Jerry, Stephen, Will McClay clearly have the majority of the say. And I would argue that it was arrival of McClay and not the arrival of Garrett that has had a bigger influence on recent drafts.

And lets be perfectly honest here................outside of 3 successful first round pick Olineman, what has the draft really given us in Garretts tenure? Sean Lee? One great year from Murray? We are still getting next to nothing outside of the first round. And articles have showed that they are in the bottom half of the league in getting talent from mid to late round picks.

Garrett doenst pick the players here. The only other coaches that did in the Jerry era are Jimmy and Parcells.
Oh, JG made none of these selections. It's always been JJ/SJ's party; that's why they love JG so much...he doesn't mind. I would swallow my pride for 6M a yr. TR allows JG to look remotely formidable, or it's 1-11.
 
Last edited:

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
Nicely done on the work load, but your analysis I find a little off.

I dont feel this coincides with the coaches. Its more about who has what power during the tenure of the coach and the influence or lack there of from the scouting department and other outside influences on Jerry such as Stephen Jones and McClay.

Wade had little say so Jones was still calling all the shots. We didnt have a quality scouting departmen and McClay wasnt here yet. Parcells speaks for himself because he had as much influence as anyone but Jimmy. We know Campo had little to nothing.

We also know that although Garrett clearly has more than Wade or Campo, he is still an outsider when it comes to the draft and the war room. Jerry, Stephen, Will McClay clearly have the majority of the say. And I would argue that it was arrival of McClay and not the arrival of Garrett that has had a bigger influence on recent drafts.

And lets be perfectly honest here................outside of 3 successful first round pick Olineman, what has the draft really given us in Garretts tenure? Sean Lee? One great year from Murray? We are still getting next to nothing outside of the first round. And articles have showed that they are in the bottom half of the league in getting talent from mid to late round picks.

Garrett doenst pick the players here. The only other coaches that did in the Jerry era are Jimmy and Parcells.

Actually, your description of Wade's and Campo's lack of power in the draft was exactly my point as was the circumstances surrounding the other coaches. Once you determine that Wade and Campo had very little power then you come to the conclusion that Jerry Jones had more influence on the draft than he did with, for example, Parcells. With Parcells he often deferred to him. You can compare the results. without a legitmate HC that understood how to build a team, Jerry Jones was lost. His drafts were terrible.

I totally disagree on your take that Garrett is left out. He is absolutely the most influential.

How do I know this? Because he told us exactly how he was going to build the team and the type of personnel he was looking for. He described, in detail, his philosophy for acquiring talent, how competition, not big free agent contracts, would provide the talent while forming the right kind of chemistry. ,He explained that trading away future picks drastically reduced the value of their draft positions and the potential to build a team.

Did you know that all offensive linemen drafted by the Cowboys past the 3rd round were Academic All Americans or Conference? Did you know that the majority of players drafted in the past five seasons were college team captains? Did you know that most of the picks, other than the blue chip 1st rounders, played in college up to their senior year....and that the majority of them graduated with a degree?

That is Jason Garrett.

Have you noticed that the Cowboys have very....very rarely traded a future draft pick away? Have you noticed that they haven't used future high draft picks to trade for a premium veteran since Jason Garrett became HC? Many many fans have seen opportunities to get a premium player and wondered why the Cowboys have never pulled a trigger.

That is Jason Garrett.

Did you notice that, rather than go after a recently available veteran, they prefer to let their current young players compete for the position?

That is Jason Garrett.

Make no mistake about it. This is Jason Garrett's team. He can still find a way to operate despite Jerry Jones's constant sabotage which some describe as contribution. In fact, it's vetry easy to distinguish a Jerry decision from a Jason decision.

McClay has been with the Cowboys since 2002, mostly involved with pro personnel alongside Judd Garrett.

The recent Cowboy drafts in the lower rounds won't set the league on fire but it certainly isn't barren. There has been 435 game appearences by these players during Garrett;'s tenure, that's more than New England, Carolina, and Pittsburgh.
 

Frosty

Bigdog24
Messages
3,960
Reaction score
2,257
Nicely done on the work load, but your analysis I find a little off.

I dont feel this coincides with the coaches. Its more about who has what power during the tenure of the coach and the influence or lack there of from the scouting department and other outside influences on Jerry such as Stephen Jones and McClay.

Wade had little say so Jones was still calling all the shots. We didnt have a quality scouting departmen and McClay wasnt here yet. Parcells speaks for himself because he had as much influence as anyone but Jimmy. We know Campo had little to nothing.

We also know that although Garrett clearly has more than Wade or Campo, he is still an outsider when it comes to the draft and the war room. Jerry, Stephen, Will McClay clearly have the majority of the say. And I would argue that it was arrival of McClay and not the arrival of Garrett that has had a bigger influence on recent drafts.

And lets be perfectly honest here................outside of 3 successful first round pick Olineman, what has the draft really given us in Garretts tenure? Sean Lee? One great year from Murray? We are still getting next to nothing outside of the first round. And articles have showed that they are in the bottom half of the league in getting talent from mid to late round picks.

Garrett doenst pick the players here. The only other coaches that did in the Jerry era are Jimmy and Parcells.

Im steal wonder what the plan is...if Romo gets that LAST career ending hit, whats the plan...to late to turn to the draft.
 

Gameover

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,792
Reaction score
3,442
Parcells knew talent.

Like passing on Aaron Rodgers twice?

Not to mention Matty Ice.

Barbie Crapenter... Complete bust

Like signing Drew Bledsoe when Kurt Werner was available?

You guys complain about a Jones's middle round picks, how did youlike Bruce Thorton and Skyler Green? Two 4th round stiffs.

Only thing Parcells did in Dallas was to get lucky with a gift from the football heavens... Tony Romo

The drafting under Garrett has been pretty damn good!
 

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
Parcells knew talent.

Like passing on Aaron Rodgers twice?

Not to mention Matty Ice.

Barbie Crapenter... Complete bust

Like signing Drew Bledsoe when Kurt Werner was available?

You guys complain about a Jones's middle round picks, how did youlike Bruce Thorton and Skyler Green? Two 4th round stiffs.

Only thing Parcells did in Dallas was to get lucky with a gift from the football heavens... Tony Romo

The drafting under Garrett has been pretty damn good!

I wasn't expressing an opinion. I was stating a statistical fact.

No opinion can change the fact that the Cowboys had more pro Bowl selections with the group of draftees during Parcel's stay. It can't change the fact that the group played in the 2nd most games and was 3rd is games started.

Parcell's was lucky? he was gifted Romo?

Let me put this into perspective by stating a relatively unknown fact. :

Tony Romo was only the 2nd quarterback in Super Bowl era NFL history to not play a single down as a quarterback for at least two entire seasons before eventually being the starting quarterback for an NFL season.

And there is something else he has in common with the only other quarterback under those circumstances. They both had the same Head Coach.

The other quarterback was Jeff Hostetler, starting quarterback in Super Bowl 25 for the Champion New York Giants. A lot of organizations say they want to be patient and develop a raw quarterback but Parcells is the only one to actually do it. And he did it twice.


Knowing talent doesn't mean being right every time, it means that you know how to build a competitive team with the potential of going all the way.

Bill Parcells is the only HC in NFL history to take four different teams to the playoff. He left a Cowboy team that averaged 10.5 wins during a four year span, the only period of consistant winning since the Super Bowl 30 season.
 
Top