Texas_Pete
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,752
- Reaction score
- 15,777
They would be stupid to not give up a first round choice for an oft-injured QB that you basically are renting for at most two years?
They would be stupid to piss off an opportunity to win a super bowl because they don't have a QB. If the Texans give up three firsts to get Romo and he won them a super Bowl would they do that? Hell yeah.
Romo can play for another 3 years or so. He has only been injured because the refs have refused to protect him like they have Rodgers. The first collar bone break was a pile drive into the turf. A knee to the back could break any QBs vertabrae.
Him being brittle is essentially a fallacy. If Romo plays for Houston pencil them in for the Super Bowl. The will be there next February.
You do lose the benefits of the June 1 designation though.That is exactly the same if you cut or trade him...... all the new money comes off either way
and if you use the June 1st designation you don't get any cap relief until June 2nd, so it is uselessYou do lose the benefits of the June 1 designation though.
Just clarying that it's not exactly the same, bk, not assessing value.and if you use the June 1st designation you don't get any cap relief until June 2nd, so it is useless
This article should be required reading for all Cowboys fansThe writer...some random guy with the handle VAFan (assume a fan in Virginia) seems to agree with some on this forum....but none of the insiders, analysts or GMs out there.
Does not mean he's wrong by any means. It's just not what many think will happen.
All of us fans DO hope Dallas lands a huge bounty for Romo. I just don't personally expect it.
you are right....... it is way worse to release him nowJust clarying that it's not exactly the same, bk, not assessing value.
So, if they wait and still end up not getting anything..or little..for Romo (or if they just release him in August outright) they manage to not only screw him in almost the biggest way possible, but also lose their chance of at least getting the extra cap savings from the pre-June designation....which they may or may not need to use.This article should be required reading for all Cowboys fans
DAL gets the same exact benefits releasing Romo in August as they do next week.... why continue helping other teams improve at our expense
I don't want to make Tony's post Cowboy life easier..... he wants to beat DAL and win the Super BowlSo, if they wait and still end up not getting anything..or little..for Romo (or if they just release him in August outright) they manage to not only screw him in a almost the biggest way possible, but also lose their chance of at least getting the extra cap savings from the pre-June designation....which they may or may not need to use.
Hey, you're not alone in thinking "F Romo, we got our pounds of flesh from him, now let's squeeze every ounce of marrow remaining" ...even if it's a late 5th rounder.
You are entitled to that line of thinking, of course.
There are several others here that agree with you.
I don't want to make Tony's post Cowboy life easier..... he wants to beat DAL and win the Super Bowl
I laugh at Cowboy fans that want Romo to achieve that goal somewhere else
I am not some bleeding heart liberal that roots for all humanity ....I am a Cowboy fan and want whats best for DAL............Romo has been paid over 140m for his contributions.......that is more than enough for me not to give a crap about his post-Cowboy career
The rest of league is paying attention as well...especially other players.
I would rather keep Romo than releasing him for nothing...........he is more valuable to us than cap space we won't spend..........is that screwing him too..... go start a fan club if you care so muchDallas also tried to trade Ware, but they were only getting low ball offers either due to his salary, age, or injuries.
They decided he was long time contributor and heart of the team and that screwing him was not cool.
They released him and let him go where he wanted and was wanted.
As for not wanting Romo to succeed somewhere else...laugh away at us that do.
Usually, not all of the time, those not wanting him to succeed were not big fans of his here in the first place.
It's your right
New England is a good example of a team not doing that. Not many (or any) others.Exactly, New England takes zero **** from players and is team first. As a result, when a player wants a great shot at a ring, they go to the Pats and fall in line.
Players go to teams like the Cowboys (hopefully of the past...Marcellus Wiley loves to brag about this endlessly) to get paid
Do whats best for the team, always, and there will be no shortage of players willing to play for a contender
I would rather keep Romo than releasing him for nothing...........he is more valuable to us than cap space we won't spend..........is that screwing him too..... go start a fan club if you care so much
They would be stupid to piss off an opportunity to win a super bowl because they don't have a QB. If the Texans give up three firsts to get Romo and he won them a super Bowl would they do that? Hell yeah.
.Romo can play for another 3 years or so. He has only been injured because the refs have refused to protect him like they have Rodgers. The first collar bone break was a pile drive into the turf. A knee to the back could break any QBs vertebrae
Him being brittle is essentially a fallacy.
Who do you want ......KMoore?????
Exactly, New England takes zero **** from players and is team first. As a result, when a player wants a great shot at a ring, they go to the Pats and fall in line.
Players go to teams like the Cowboys (hopefully of the past...Marcellus Wiley loves to brag about this endlessly) to get paid
Do whats best for the team, always, and there will be no shortage of players willing to play for a contender