RS12
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 32,527
- Reaction score
- 29,874
The defense is a problem. Not only the DL but we are weak at MLB. .
Oh yeah but one of many. You arent winning with that front 7 though.
The defense is a problem. Not only the DL but we are weak at MLB. .
Bring your source on passer rating...another rating might be completion percentage....or quarterback rating.
I think that Lawrence helps a TON. Swapping out Crawford at LE for Lawrence is a monumental upgrade.The defense is a problem. Not only the DL but we are weak at MLB. Hitchens isn't a full time starter in this league.
Some fans knew this though and some fans just put their goggles on and believed that a bunch of no names and cast offs would gel into an effective group.
The reality is that this team is going to struggle to stop teams in close games in the 4th Q. They don't generate enough pressure to keep QBs uncomfortable back there so when a team is forced to pass given a game situation, they likely will find success because the combo of no pass rush and then Marinelli playing softer coverages to prevent big plays will result in methodic but effective drives.
And no, I don't believe getting Lawrence back changes that. I like Lawrence a lot and think he's a very good player but he's not dominant enough to change the complexion of a DL.
Yeah, that was BS by Lane. His bad, CC.
Maybe it was posted early in the first quarter?
Dak's passer rating was 69.4
By far the lowest passer rating Dallas has had in many years vs the Giants.
I think that Lawrence helps a TON. Swapping out Crawford at LE for Lawrence is a monumental upgrade.
When you pair Lawrence with Mayowa, who played very well yesterday (5 pressures and a sack), we may have something with what we are seeing from McClain and Collins in the middle.
Not happy at all with Tyrone Crawford's play yesterday, looked lost.
Mark just doesn't up and misquote almost anything. He is a very articulate reporter, and call up tons of stats in almost all situations. I'd want to see an official rendering before blowing that guy off...just saying.
I didn't have a big issue with Brown on that play.
Yeah, that was BS by Lane. His bad, CC.
Maybe it was posted early in the first quarter?
Dak's passer rating was 69.4
By far the lowest passer rating Dallas has had in many years vs the Giants.
You denying he's right and the tweet was wrong?
Really?Bring your source on passer rating...another rating might be completion percentage....or quarterback rating.
That is one of the theories. Even so, it should help others to be freed up if he is doubled or chipped.I am not so sure. Hope you are right but I think Lawrence was so productive last year because he had Hardy on the other side and teams were focused on him. I think it's going to be Lawrence that sees more chips, doubles, etc.
I think this is going to be another year where when push comes to shove, we just won't be able to generate real, consistent pressure on QBs. Manning, on that winning drive, just stood back there without any real heat at all. That's the sign of a real pass rush.........
Prove it was wrong, and leave the ever present personality out of your discussions. Talk what is stated, pal.
Really?
I saw it in the NFL Gamebook but here is his actual stats from the game.
http://www.nfl.com/player/dakprescott/2555260/profile
That is one of the theories. Even so, it should help others to be freed up if he is doubled or chipped.
Lawrence looked great this preseason. Gave Tyron fits in practice. Similar size and production as Vernon.
If we could ever get Gregory to stay on the field....we may have something.
Think a lot of that particular rating evolved around no touchdowns thrown and having to throw away quite a few balls keeping away from sacks?
As to his throws, there also were quite a few missed by receivers or dropped as well...think?
THAT is a discussion.
I am not saying that I think Dak played bad, I actually am happy with his performance. I was just correcting that tweet's quoted qb rating which was inaccurate.Think a lot of that particular rating evolved around no touchdowns thrown and having to throw away quite a few balls keeping away from sacks?
As to his throws, there also were quite a few missed by receivers or dropped as well...think?
THAT is a discussion.
Fair, but I'm not making a final observation on the initial tweet...that guy is hard to find wrong. I don't know the details of the tweet. But it was an indicator at some point, I can bet on that...I am not saying that I think Dak played bad, I actually am happy with his performance. I was just correcting that tweet's quoted qb rating which was inaccurate.
I'm just telling you, that he must have posted that rating at half time or before.Mark just doesn't up and misquote almost anything. He is a very articulate reporter, and call up tons of stats in almost all situations. I'd want to see an official rendering before blowing that guy off...just saying.
But Dak did have to make considerable business decisions in throwing the ball away...from personal observation.
Yeah, that was BS by Lane. His bad, CC.
Maybe it was posted early in the first quarter?
Dak's passer rating was 69.4
By far the lowest passer rating Dallas has had in many years vs the Giants.