Alexander;2650356 said:
From Scott Wright
Strengths:
Excellent size and bulk...Very quick off the snap...Great strength...Is stout at the point of attack...Does a terrific job against the run...Gets a good push up the middle...Will collapse the pocket...A powerful tackler...Shows the ability to shoot gaps and penetrate at times...Nice instincts / awareness...Lots of experience...Improving and has upside.
from NFLDraftScout
Positives: Square-framed, naturally large man. … Surprising initial quickness off the snap to disrupt the play before it has a chance to begin. … Good lateral quickness to slide down the line. … Good use of hands to slap away the blockers' attempts to control him. … Good overall strength, especially in his lower body, to hold up at the point. … Can anchor against the double-team and flashes the ability to split. … Able to close if given a free lane. … Recognizes the action quickly and can slide off the block onto the runner as he goes by. … Versatile defender capable of projecting as a zero-, one- or three-technique at the next level.
Negatives: Only "phone booth" quickness. …
Requires a free lane to close on the quarterback and isn't going to provide significant interior pass rush. … Marginal effort and ability in pursuit. … Flanked by a better prospect in Raji and often faces only one blocker. … Struggled with a recurring back injury in 2008. … Concern over back injury only heightened considering his heavy build and potential to allow his weight to get out of control.
Alexander said:
And it is very possible the vanilla defenses allowed at the Senior Bowl weren't showcasing much that he can do. I watched the practices and he was doing very very well against a trio of top centers all week.
even vanilla defenses ask their DTs to penetrate into the backfield
Alexander said:
So high? What is so high? The second round?
the 2nd round is generally considered a high round
Alexander said:
Phillips' nose tackles can play one and two gap. He's not married to either. He's won with both. We aren't doing "due dilligence". There is a reason we (along with a host of 3-4 teams) have been very interested.
he's not going to change the whole D because of Ron Brace
Alexander said:
You just got finished saying you've been down on him a while and he's slow and what not, now you are saying you'd like the pick if we ran Parcells 3-4. Which is it?
I've been down on him because we don't run a Parcells' D where it requires a blocker magnet at NT
I don't see how my position on him has been back and forth