Rack
Federal Agent
- Messages
- 23,906
- Reaction score
- 3,106
Is that it would be completely useless to have discussions during the offseason about what needs to be done to improve the team, cuz no matter if we get our big run stuffing NG, an ILB that can actually cover a slow TE, an OLB opposite Ware that teams can't ignore (and get away with it) or whatever... cuz the main problem will still remain.
Jerry Jones.
He obviously means well. But the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Or something.
Something Bill Parcells said when he was coaching the Cowboys... (paraphrasing) "A team has to have one voice".
Jerry Jones will never allow this. When you read/hear about players going to Jerry Jones to discuss their problems, it's undermining the coach. Jerry needs to send those players to the HC if any of those pansies try to go over the HC's head. It won't happen.
Sure we need to replace Wade (sorry, but his persona lends to the complete charminizing - aka softening - of the team. I like him as a DC, but we need a HC first, then a DC). Sure we can replace Stewart, and Reed, and Garrett. But none of it will matter as long as Jerrah keeps getting involved. He needs to sign checks and market the team. THAT'S IT.
So yay, we can get excited when JJ brings in some big name. But the underlining problem will remain. So how can we truly get excited about any moves we make?
I know some of you don't want to hear this, but our best chance for success was with Parcells. I know a lot of you blamed him for our shortcomings, but you ever stop to think maybe his coaching wasn't as effective as it should have (could have) been because of Jerry? Anyoen really believe Jerry COMPLETELY stayed out of the coaches business while BP was here? Hell, he said himself he watched film with the coaches. That's a problem IMO (not the film watching specifically).
IMO Parcells was trying to teach the team to win in december and january, and that's why he was so conservative. He wanted games close so he can teach the team to win under pressure. Sure, it's boring for the fans, but I believe it would have worked well eventually if not for Jerry getting in the way. That second "voice".
Jerry Jones.
He obviously means well. But the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Or something.
Something Bill Parcells said when he was coaching the Cowboys... (paraphrasing) "A team has to have one voice".
Jerry Jones will never allow this. When you read/hear about players going to Jerry Jones to discuss their problems, it's undermining the coach. Jerry needs to send those players to the HC if any of those pansies try to go over the HC's head. It won't happen.
Sure we need to replace Wade (sorry, but his persona lends to the complete charminizing - aka softening - of the team. I like him as a DC, but we need a HC first, then a DC). Sure we can replace Stewart, and Reed, and Garrett. But none of it will matter as long as Jerrah keeps getting involved. He needs to sign checks and market the team. THAT'S IT.
So yay, we can get excited when JJ brings in some big name. But the underlining problem will remain. So how can we truly get excited about any moves we make?
I know some of you don't want to hear this, but our best chance for success was with Parcells. I know a lot of you blamed him for our shortcomings, but you ever stop to think maybe his coaching wasn't as effective as it should have (could have) been because of Jerry? Anyoen really believe Jerry COMPLETELY stayed out of the coaches business while BP was here? Hell, he said himself he watched film with the coaches. That's a problem IMO (not the film watching specifically).
IMO Parcells was trying to teach the team to win in december and january, and that's why he was so conservative. He wanted games close so he can teach the team to win under pressure. Sure, it's boring for the fans, but I believe it would have worked well eventually if not for Jerry getting in the way. That second "voice".