They just need another good RB. Doesn't matter if he is change of pace or not. Just someone that is good.
If they happen to be blazing fast too then that would be nice but role players under Garrett never get enough opportunities to do anything so you might as well have a legit RB instead of a pure pass catcher or someone like that.
Yeah, I'd rather have an all-around type of back who can actually thrive taking hand-offs in our standard offense, not someone who needs special packages and gimmicks built in to give him some semblance of usefulness.
Other than Dunbar (for, like, that one great month he had that one time), almost every time we go get some gimmicky, gadgety type of specialty player, I feel like they almost always are a dud. We spend a whole spring or summer hearing how great they are at that thing they do. And then reality hits, and they're not good enough at enough things to get on the field. And usually they aren't anything special at that one thing we were told they're great at anyway.
It's kind of like when people say, "Telling me you have two quarterbacks is really just telling me you don't even have one." When I hear people swearing how a guy will be a red-zone beast or the ultimate gadget player, what I really hear you telling me is: "Okay, so he can't actually 'play' in the traditional sense of the word."
I'd rather have a guy who can play. A guy who, if the starter ahead of him goes down or gets suspended, will be able to step in and function like a starter.