burmafrd;1242492 said:
MB is bigger and stronger - no arguement. He SHOULD break arm tackles more. You keep trying to credit MB with all sorts of things that have no factual evidence to back it up. especially statements by opposing players that have to be taken with a grain of salt. Between the 20's, you notice that unless the D is worn out in the 4th, MB does no better then JJ does. The O line does not seem to like to run block untill they get to the red zone.
The fact is other players said it and more people are starting to see it around the league. I can dig up the thread if you'd like but then again, you said we should take those quotes with a grain of salt right.
OK. According to you, the O line only run blocks within the 20 yard line and only when the defenses are worn down in the 4th. If that's the case, we should be using JJ more because of the "threat" of him breaking a big one and sealing the game should be greater in the 4th. Wouldn't this be obvious to even Pop Warner coaches? Use your best back when the opposing team can no longer defend the run. Why keep the game close? Bring JJ back in the game in the 4th and let him break a couple of long ones against a tired defense so we can put the games out of reach.
Point blank. JJ is not a scat back. He is not extremely elusive. He is a cut back runner but lacks the power of Tiki and lacks the elusivness and field vision of Warrick Dunn or Brian Westbrook. Only one of the mentioned backs are elite backs in this league so I am not setting the bar too high here. JJ is not the most aggressive runner that I've seen and the only argument that people can say about JJ is that he is a "threat" to break one. Well while the above backs are doing what they do, I am still waiting on JJ to do something on a regular basis besides run into the the rearends of his O line and play dead.
Come playoff time we will see who BP goes with for the majority of the runs. I am willing to bet it's MB. I will then see what your reasoning for this is.