They changed the rule because the rule was dumb. Under the rule it was not a catch. We had multiple of that exact same play that were called not a catch and it was dumb. By rule that was not a catch and the rule was dumb so they changed it.They changed the rule to cover themselves botching that play, made a complete disaster of things the following year and THEN changed it again to what it was when Dez caught it, finally with a little more clarity.
False false and more false.They changed the rule because the rule was dumb. Under the rule it was not a catch. We had multiple of that exact same play that were called not a catch and it was dumb. By rule that was not a catch and the rule was dumb so they changed it.
Aaron Rodgers is one of the biggest front runners of all-time with a terrible record when trailing by more than 1 point in the 4Q against winning teams.Let's say Dez caught it...let's say we score a TD. There would have been plenty of time left for 1-Legged Rodgers to march down the field and score. On that day, the defense was not able to stop him and was porous.
Yep. Just compare the ruling on the Dez catch to Cobb's "catch" that definitely hit the ground in the first half. One of the most obvious ref thumb on the scale games.Rigged
It's perfectly reasonable to hold both positions. WHY throw the ball 30 yards with 4 minutes left? It was a bad decision which REQUIRED Dez make an extraordinary play...which he almost pulled off. Were it in 2023, it's a catch.Romo haters: “Romo shouldve thrown it to Beasley”
Also Romo haters: “it was a catch”
No. Not even close.didn't the refs gift us the game before this one? Detroit?
Those people that claim that will never, and I mean NEVER admit that the Lions player had committed a blatant penalty right before that.my memory is a little shaky, but didn't the refs gift us the game before this one? Detroit? I remember people saying it was a fair turn around because of the Lions game. shrugs.
Yes it did.The part I've never understood is the ball pops up when his arm hits the ground but the ball itself didn't touch the ground and he caught it again when it popped up. That's a catch
Ground can’t cause a fumble so…You just told on yourself, don't they always say, some part of the ball can hit the ground. You said he trapped it THEN it hit the ground
I agree. People just need to let it go.Today is also the day that you guys are still talking about the Dez Bryan catch-non catch. Just like yesterday, the day before that and the 3,287 days in between.
Nope, it was valid and ruled as such a couple years later after extensive film review. No mistakes or lies there. No rewrites as well. 3rd step and past the goal line.I still don’t think he caught it. He trapped it and it hit the ground. When he gets up he wasn’t throwing up no X, or being cocky. He knew it moved.
Today is also the day that you guys are still talking about the Dez Bryan catch-non catch. Just like yesterday, the day before that and the 3,287 days in between.