burmafrd
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 43,820
- Reaction score
- 3,379
burmafrd;1547044 said:Typical. They at least go out and put out effort. Unlike all the snobs on both coasts that like to look down on the midwest. I am guessing abersonce that you are somewhat left of center?
burmafrd;1547054 said:I think YOU missed the point that the stats clearly showed that selfishness and self interest prevails on the coasts.
peplaw06;1547057 said:Where did it say that?
If you look at the list of top 5 cities you have:
1) Minneapolis-St. Paul
2) Salt Lake City
3) Austin
4) Omaha
5) Seattle
Austin and Seattle are pretty liberal cities. To try to use this article to make a political statement is misguided.
It makes sense that the biggest contributing factor to volunteerism is length of the commute. It doesn't surprise me that NYC and LA areas would have low rates, they could easily spend 2-3 hours a day driving. Who would have the time?
burmafrd;1547060 said:Austin is liberal- now that is interesting. Visited there a few times and never saw much of that.
Seattle is probably the most liberal city outside of SF in the US. Your theory holds no water.burmafrd;1547061 said:What I notice most about liberals is that they are willing to spend tax money just about anywhere- but try and get THEM to write a PERSONAL check and see how far you get. As regards volunteering, the numbers seem to speak for themselves. Probably depends on how far to the left you go. Nearer the edge the less you get.
abersonc;1547064 said:Minn-St Paul is pretty liberal as well. SLC gets its volunteer rates primarily from the church.
Riverside CA who were at the bottom is a very conservative city. They've got a conservative representative in the house - he's won handily since 1992 despite a number of controversies.
peplaw06;1547075 said:right, a conservative city at the bottom... and riverside is a looong way from downtown LA, so longer commutes for many people. hmmm, i seem to remember them mentioning something about commutes in the article...??
abersonc;1547093 said:I'd catch the metrolink from the inland empire into LA once or twice a month when i lived there -- huge # of people from the Riverside area on that train -- that's a 90 minute ride Downtown Riverside to Downtown LA plus whatever time you need to and from the train.
Public transportation still is generally awful in LA. They just won't devote the resources to really fixing it, plus I don't know if they really could.The Real Mavs Man;1547106 said:How long ago was that? I'm curious to know if the public transportation has improved any. Last time I was there (five years ago) it seemed that each suburb in L.A. had its own transportation system but it was hard to go from one to another.
peplaw06;1547114 said:Public transportation still is generally awful in LA. They just won't devote the resources to really fixing it, plus I don't know if they really could.
The Real Mavs Man;1547106 said:How long ago was that? I'm curious to know if the public transportation has improved any. Last time I was there (five years ago) it seemed that each suburb in L.A. had its own transportation system but it was hard to go from one to another.
burmafrd;1547060 said:I used to live in SLC and a LOT of people there have LONG commutes. .