Rush 2112 said:
Read between the lines....It's now or never for Ellis to get a Barry contract. He signed a way below market deal.
Players happy with their contract don't ask to be cut.
He's signed throught what? 2009?
He's cornered and trying to wiggle out and get a sweeter deal in the process.
No YOU read between the lines. The contract has nothing to do with it, playing time DOES. He's only complained about his minutes, not his money.
And LA played as bad as anyone who wasn't playing OT last year.
He's gone.
If you truly believe that then you've got about as much football knowledge as a clipped toenail.
That's was just completely ignorant.
I think BP is finally going to take the diaper off Peterman. The guy was a very highly reputable guard when he was drafted. He has the talent level of anyone we could hope to draft this year so I think we make the change. Larry Allen must take a pay cut. He is simply not worth 7 million dollars.
1. Let's hope the diapers stay on. Peterman sucks.
2. Highly reputable? Highly reputable guards don't get drafted in the 3rd round and then considered picked too high.
3. Talented as anyone we could hope to draft this year? You kidding me? I'll take that USC guard over any backup guard on our roster.
4. And AGAIN, Larry Allen does not HAVE to take a pay cut. Our cap number is fine. We don't need to restructure contracts to free up room. We've got PLENTY of room to bring in more FA's. PERIOD.
5. "Worth" has nothing to do with it. There isn't a football player in the NFL "worth" the money they're making.
I thought the LA savings was something like $3.5 million. You can get 2 starting guards for that.
Maybe in your little dream world.
Starting? Yes. But they'd be the two worst starting guards in the NFL, by far.
Some of you people are unbelievable. Our problems on the OL last year were, by far, due to the play of our tackles.
So your solution is to cut our best offensive lineman? F'in brilliant.