I'd play Bledsoe or Testaverde over Leinart.Chocolate Lab;4248398 said:Uh, Leinart doesn't have the talent. He sucks. Maybe he'll suck a little less if he actually gets serious about his profession -- unlike before -- but I doubt that happens.
And even if it did, he'd still suck.
I seem to remember some people thinking Yates was a good draft pick? Don't know a thing about him, but if he weren't a rookie I'd play him instead.
8FOR!3;4248330 said:"Why can't ya'll just put in TJ Yates? I heard he's really good."
Doomsday101;4249055 said:Houston did not hand out a 2 mill a year contract to Leinart this off season to have Yates take over the job.
joseephuss;4249094 said:The Cardinals and Vikings probably thought the same thing when they traded for Kolb and McNabb, respectively.
Doomsday101;4249100 said:But they were given the chance to prove themselfs.
Right now to by pass Leinart and go to Yates in my view makes no sense.
You just extended Leinart contract to remain in Houston why would they then go to their 3rd string without 1st going to Leinart?
I'm not saying it will work out for him or not same could be said about going to Yates
Doomsday101;4249055 said:Houston did not hand out a 2 mill a year contract to Leinart this off season to have Yates take over the job.
