Rack
Federal Agent
- Messages
- 23,906
- Reaction score
- 3,106
gbrittain;1325905 said:Everyone gets it...but it is simply not great satire.
Truth hurts, huh?
gbrittain;1325905 said:Everyone gets it...but it is simply not great satire.
That's actually a pretty good improvement on my answer. It all centers on what actually constitutes a mistake. It's one of those things that we really can't tell until after the fact. Moreover there is no guarantee that another playcall would have yielded better results.Rack;1325895 said:Someone is incredibly slow on the uptake.
Not surprising he has a reference to Quincy Carter in his username.
That wasn't his point either. His point isn't that the coaches made mistakes, it's that people claim the coach makes a mistake everytime something doesn't go their way. If they had converted that 3rd and 7 on that running play the same people that criticize Parcells would have called BB a genius.
His post is basically trying to slap some sense into ignorant Cowboys fans.
gbrittain;1325905 said:Everyone gets it...but it is simply not great satire.
windward;1325910 said:That's actually a pretty good improvement on my answer. It all centers on what actually constitutes a mistake. It's one of those things that we really can't tell until after the fact. Moreover there is no guarantee that another playcall would have yielded better results.
InmanRoshi;1325567 said:Calling a running play on 3rd and 7 late in the fourth quarter to kick a field goal when your defense hasn't stopped Peyton all half? He was playing not to lose. He stands there like a zombie displaying no fire or emotion. Even his clothes are boring and predictable. A loss is one thing, but this was embarassing. The largest lead surrendered in conference championship history.
Face it ... Belichick is never winning a Superbowl without Parcells' players. No McGinnest. No Vinieteri. No Ty Law. No Ted Johnson. No Championships.
Cbz40;1325928 said:Sir that is abstract thinking and there are a few that have problems w/that.
Also you must understand if you also disagree with a few you will be labled an idiot are a stupid fan, and your post become idiotic, foolish, etc. .
We are so fortunate to have so many pompus experts that want to enlighten us morons.......
DMX690;1325718 said:Last year against the Broncos when they lost to Jake Plummer.
gbrittain;1325905 said:Everyone gets it...but it is simply not great satire.
You left out the most relevant quotes: "34-32." "0-2 in the playoffs."summerisfunner;1326088 said:whoever doesn't like this thread, too bad, it's the same crap we hear everytime the Cowboys lose
"BP shows no emotion!"
"he's too conservative, running a draw on 3rd and 10!"
"bah, Bill hasn't won anything w/o Belichick and his assistants!"
"Bill is too old, he's gone senile and doesn't know how to coach anymore!"
Inman :worthy:
InmanRoshi;1325567 said:Calling a running play on 3rd and 7 late in the fourth quarter to kick a field goal when your defense hasn't stopped Peyton all half? He was playing not to lose. He stands there like a zombie displaying no fire or emotion. Even his clothes are boring and predictable. A loss is one thing, but this was embarassing. The largest lead surrendered in conference championship history.
Face it ... Belichick is never winning a Superbowl without Parcells' players. No McGinnest. No Vinieteri. No Ty Law. No Ted Johnson. No Championships.
superpunk;1326122 said:Ya know what....I'm really surprised that none of us Parcells-nut-huggers didn't toss out the awesome "If you don't like it, don't read it" or, "You think it's stupid, yet you took the time to respond to it" defense, to those that expressed their disapproval of this all-time great thread.
We must just not be on that intellectual "level".
Isn't that something you might find in a pasture?Yakuza Rich;1325615 said:Feciousness is under the letter "F" in the dictionary.
superpunk;1326122 said:We must just not be on that intellectual "level".
Skin;1326191 said:Congratulations! You guys on the "short bus" finally figured it out.
CanadianCowboysFan;1325972 said:Is it because it isn't good or simply because you don't agree with it?