JohnnyTheFox
Achilleslastand
- Messages
- 9,912
- Reaction score
- 19,121
Wont post the details here, he is a straight up punk. Just google him.whats up with his brother?
Wont post the details here, he is a straight up punk. Just google him.whats up with his brother?
Much worse, isn't even close.He's the Chiefs' version of Tad Prescott.
Agree! I'm sick and tired of players ignoring their legal contracts and getting away with it.Did anyone else bristle over Chris Jones watching the game from an Arrowhead suite, flanked by his agents? Another guy, already under contract, holding his team hostage for an early raise. Traitorous. Zach Martin did the same thing, which was just as wrong.
Neither was it necessary for the Chiefs. Their defense was not that bad.Our defense can make stops, so it wouldn't be a necessary call in the same scenario.
Waah! Waah! Waah! Comparing entertainment to a 9 to 5 is illogical. Do coaches, GM's and Owners, draw the same ire?Agree! I'm sick and tired of players ignoring their legal contracts and getting away with it.
When people out here in the real world sign contracts they're expected to live up to them, but not football players. They thumb their noses at legal contracts because they know they'll get away with it.
Your waah waah waah doesn't cut it with a legal contract. You're telling me that legality only applies if it benefits the player, if it doesn't benefit the player then a legal contract isn't really a legal contract.Waah! Waah! Waah! Comparing entertainment to a 9 to 5 is illogical. Do coaches, GM's and Owners, draw the same ire?
Nowhere in my post did I suggest that. If you are going to reply, please stay on point. Legalities should benefit both parties in a legal contract.Your waah waah waah doesn't cut it with a legal contract. You're telling me that legality only applies if it benefits the player, if it doesn't benefit the player then a legal contract isn't really a legal contract.![]()