TO Attacked the O till it became a joke

[CF74]

The man bragged that he told Garrett to his face that he didn't respect him. Nothing he did was going to be good enough.

Here's a serious question, how long before there is media speculation that the reason Tony Romo was instructing the WRs where to go was because they were sandbagging plays to make Garrett look bad?

That's why I said earlier that Jerry was the enabler. I heard reports that Garrett went to Jerry with some complaints but Jerry let it slide, till now. All in all it's a tough situation to be in for a new OC. He survived TO so he has nowhere to go but up.

On to the second question. There were times where I felt like Romo himself was throwing picks on purpose so I don't doubt it entirely. When I go back in my mind on certain plays that were to TO, it was like they both knew something we didn't. I'm not convinced it was all to make Garrett look bad but rather to get TO out of here. Nothing surprises me anymore...

 

[CF74]

I have come to realize on message boards when people try to attack spelling and grammer, their argument is really weak. Communication has taken place, you understood what was said, this is not a academic setting.

Once again, even when the Oline was not hurt, Romo still had 21 turnovers the pervious year. He had 16 when he started 10 games! Romo accounts for 58 turnovers in the past 39 games. Romo...by himself....58 turnovers. That is a very serious problem. Hell Jason Candle only has 32 in a similar amount of games. Quincy carter has 45 Turnovers in 34 games which is 5 short of Romo. Hopefull that gives you a idea of how serious romo's turnover problem is.

Let's get to the root of the problems it starts with the QB position.

I'm not attacking grammar. I'm explaining that my previous statement was not really a statement but a QUESTION. As in, Does anybody know the facts? Anyways as I just mentioned previously, yeah Romo is accountable for his own actions and yes his turnovers are a big concern. I'm also of the opinion that some of those picks (Thrown in TO's direction) may have been intentional, maybe. Pure speculation at this point....

 

[Vintage]

get a clue, the NFL is not fantasy football or video games.

one narcissistic loser can suck talent right out of the other players on the team. stunt growth. so we didn't necessarily become "less talented" whatsoever.

we did NOTHING - when it mattered - with mr. overdose and weren't going to next year or the follow years (had jerry honored his/stephen's horrendous contract extension with stale popcorn).

you should consider the church of "well coaching and best utilizing talents of a cohesive team"

take jerry with you.

get a clue, yourself.

Re-read what I wrote. Everything you said falls into the latter part of what I said "what remains to be seen is if it makes us a better TEAM."

Simple question: did we lose out on talent by cutting Owens?

The answer is yes. Even if you think Roy Williams is a better WR than Owens... Owens is still a better WR than Crayton. We lost talent.

THAT is what I said.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Individuals like Terrell Owens cannot be controlled by others or comply to other's wishes and requests. They will only abide to those things which they agree with for personal gain.

awesome sig

 

[Bob Sacamano]

get a clue, yourself.

powerful stuff

 

[5Stars]

Individuals like Terrell Owens cannot be controlled by others or comply to other's wishes and requests. They will only abide to those things which they agree with for personal gain.

That is just wrong!


:laugh1: :laugh1:



Dude! I'm a hater.

 

[Hostile]

awesome sig

Anyone who hates DEs sig has to blame me. It was my idea and I forced him to use it.

 

[Bob Sacamano]

Anyone who hates DEs sig has to blame me. It was my idea and I forced him to use it.

good call

 

[Funxva]

I cannot stand JFE, but this was spot on. Good Riddance! We were good before him, and while he helped us win games, we can be good without him. The Team has an identity, and a very very potent offense, and not to forget, some pretty special defensive players also!

 

[Bach]

Why was the put in the NFL Zone? It's definitely Cowboys related and provides huge insight into the issues this team was having last year.

 

[CF74]

Why was the put in the NFL Zone? It's definitely Cowboys related and provides huge insight into the issues this team was having last year.

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2678622&postcount=1

 

[Cowboys2008]

We are the Dallas Cowboys, and truthfully, who really can say what actually happen?

On one hand; Stories are notoriously made up about us. We after all, are the Dallas Cowboys.

On the other hand; Stories may be made up about us for the most part, by design. Without a doubt, we have possibly the largest media/propaganda machine in all of professional sports working for us. Things get hidden, historically, dating way back before Jerry Jones. Ordeals, pushed under the rug. We are the Dallas Cowboys.

So in the end, who really knows. Literally everything could have been made up about, TO, ultimately making it a necessity to push him out of town. Or, things could have been 10000x worse then ever actually reported and our propaganda machine did an absolutely AMAZING job covering it all up and keeping it as much "in-house" as possible.

Though really, one way or another, who really cares? This is the past, in a handful of seasons, where we did nothing to remember- TO or no TO. What hasn't happen is what's important from this point on. Seeing what we have now that cards are on the table and where we go from here is what's important.

With that all said; This is my last post ever regarding TO unless he plays us, for he's just not a Cowboy anymore. I just wonder how long it will take the rest to also stop talking about him; To stop the "obsession" either for or against a player that's not even on our team any longer. So who is it, who's going to start sounding like an Eagle fan and never let this whole TO thing go?

 

[Jon88]

Who didn't see this coming when we signed him?

 

[DallasEast]

Who didn't see this coming when we signed him?

The short answer?

Way too many.

 

[Jon88]

We are going to be a better team without that sack of crap.

That's how I feel. This was set to happen the moment he signed, which never should have happened in the first place. You don't sign a guy who disrespects your team in about the worst way possible. I don't care how good he is. You find other wide recievers or other stars. Clearly that's the route that should have been taken.