To Succeed, Cowboys Must Reverse Disturbing Trends

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
A Downward Trend

Before December, the Cowboys averaged 28.7 points a game. In the three December games they have averaged 16.7, down 42%.

Previously, they also averaged .66 (two thirds) turnovers a game. They have tripled their turnover rate in December to 2.00.

The Cowboys have increased their penalties per game in December by over 20%, from 6.3 per game to 7.7 while the number of opponent penalties have remained virtually the same.

The Cowboys success was due based in part to dominating the time of possession where they ranked #1 during the first three months. In December they are merely pedestrian and ranked #13. They lost an average of 4 minutes of offense a game.

Before December, 62.7% of their scoring drives were TD's rather than field goals. in December, only 38.5% were TD's.

Why? How the Cowboys Can Reverse These Trends

When other teams are beginning to assert themselves and peak in December, the Cowboy's offensive productivity is declining. Two reasons are obvious, teams knew very little about Dak and Zeke, They now do a better job game planning. In addition, the two most productive elements, Dak and Zeke are rookies. Prior to this season they were used to a schedule of 11 to 12 games. To go all the way, they will play 20 NFL games. they are not acclimated to this length of a season.

The Cowboys need to increase the weapons in their arsenal and the next two games would be a perfect opportunity. Yes, you continue to play Dak and Zeke but they should make every effort to integrate McFadden into the gameplans going forward. Mcfadden provides a quality alternative.

Convert McFadden to Fullback

There is another option, a pretty exciting one......Make McFadden the fullback and put Zeke and him both in the game together. It could help to alleviate the fact that the TE position has not been as productive as in the past. It would provide a more powerful running style by the offense. McFadden is also a very capable receiver.

This would not be the first time the Cowboys converted a quality RB to a FB. In fact, Landry did it several times, very successfully.

Duane Thomas was converted to FB to be in the same backfield as Calvin Hill in 1971 with 3 games left in the regular season. Just as soon as they did that, the Cowboys productivity went off the charts, they averaged a combined 6.1 yards a carry for almost 500 yards in those three games. The team scored a combined 129 points in those three games, an average of 43 points a game.

In 1975, the Super Bowl year of the Dirty Dozen, the leading rusher was Robert Newhouse who gained 930 yards in a 14 game season. Two years later the Cowboys drafted Tony Dorsett. They converted Robert Newhouse to FB and they established a running game that propelled them into the next two Super Bowls.

When your FB is a legitimate running threat, as well as both being capable receivers, defenses must respect this. It also takes wear and tear off your RB and produces a blocker at the direct point of attack. With the aging of Witten and the injuries to Hannah and Swaim, as well as Escobar being practically invisible, now would be the time to implement this and give defenses something else to worry about.

Find a Way Not to Waste an Elite Skill Set

There is also an opportunity to do something that normally would not be considered advantageous, however, the Cowboys are built like none other in the NFL:

Without warning, you could insert Romo for a drive. His skill set forces teams to gameplan him differently but that would be extremely difficult if they didn't know when he would be utilized. It would confuse opponent defenses. They could not concentrate on defending against the style and attributes of a single QB.

We all speak about the game being a team sport, what rules say you can't use two quarterbacks? How many teams have two starting QB's capable of playing at a high level. Why can we not benefit from this rare opportunity? Dak is the starter, but Romo comes in for a drive. Maybe he comes in for two, Maybe none. The point is that HC's must respect this and gameplan it which limits their ability to concentrate in another area.

I'm not talking about rotating them, Dak is the starter. But if you rest a RB for a drive, perhaps use a different one for a changeup, why not do the same at QB if you realize there will not be a measurable drop in talent and productivity. It could be at any time in the game, two minute warning before halftime, first drive after halftime, 2nd drive of the game, whatever..

By creating a more diverse set of weapons, by including multiple skill sets, the opponent must dedicate a finite amount of time to a larger variety of weapons, diluting their preparation for each. Even if the Cowboys do it only once, the mere possibility must not be discounted by an opponent.

Regardless, the Cowboys must address their recent drop in offensive production, the answer shouldn't be hugging a bench for 60 minutes, the more, the merrier.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
We could also try keeping in mind the quality ofthe Giants and Vikings defenses. I don't think the offensive production dip had anything to do with teams gameplannkng differently for Dak or Zeke or with them being rookies.

We do need to cut the offensive penalties, but then those are a function of the DLs we faced in December, too.
 

CT Dal Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,213
Reaction score
21,493
I think another reason is the defenses Dallas has faced. The Vikings were still interested when they played Dallas, the Giants always give them trouble, and the Bucs were on a roll defensively.

Having said that, the Cowboys came out of this stretch 2-1. So they had to be doing something right themselves, too.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
There is no such thing as bad ideas - only lessons learned. It's what makes companies great - the ability to think outside the box and implement innovation and I respect your post.

But...

There is something to continuity and getting a feel for a game. Dak seems to figure it out as he goes, which is why we find a way to win. Romo has always had this ability, no matter how bad things got, he figured it out.

But now - as we enter the playoffs, you go with who got you here. Plus, you would be asking Romo to come off the bench on a part-time basis when he hasn't played in over a year. He would be better off playing an entire game than just spelling Dak.

As far as running backs how much different is Zeke than every other RB on the team. He's as powerful as McFadden, he's as elusive as Dunbar and he's as consistent as Alfred Morris. There's not a perceptible change where defenses would have to account for something different.

The idea is commendable.

The implementation would probably not work.
 

Elusive6thRing

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,985
Reaction score
3,300
If we knew we had to go on the road and play another sloppy game in New York or go to the frozen tundra I'd give this thread a shred of credibility, but we do not. We will be playing in Jerry world throughout, and if we get to the Super Bowl? Houston. It's only a small sample size of struggling on the road against great defenses in bad weather, who would have thought? We have no concerns about playing on the road the rest of the season, Philly does not matter.

In home games we are averaging 27 points a game, that is where the playoffs will be.

But I should have known the only reason OP really posted this article is because it mentions inserting Romo. This is just another love Romo/hate Dak thread.

BTW you're supposed to credit the article with a link and not just paste it.
 
Last edited:

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
17,757
Aren't you the same guy who's fantasy involves Dak getting concussed?
Please? I'm asking nicely, please, before I suffer a nervous breakdown followed by a deep depression over the disintegrating condition of the American educational system....especially as it pertains to reading comprehension.

Please tell me you're just messing with me....
 

Elusive6thRing

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,985
Reaction score
3,300
Please? I'm asking nicely, please, before I suffer a nervous breakdown followed by a deep depression over the disintegrating condition of the American educational system....especially as it pertains to reading comprehension.

Please tell me you're just messing with me....

Messing with you? He's absolutely right, you did that.
 

gmoney112

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,589
Reaction score
15,694
We could also try keeping in mind the quality ofthe Giants and Vikings defenses. I don't think the offensive production dip had anything to do with teams gameplannkng differently for Dak or Zeke or with them being rookies.

We do need to cut the offensive penalties, but then those are a function of the DLs we faced in December, too.

Haha, yeah. Next thing you know, it'll be a "trend" that we don't run well behind the LT, even though it looks like the starter will be Cleary or whoever the third string tackle is against Detroit.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,709
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
A Downward Trend

Before December, the Cowboys averaged 28.7 points a game. In the three December games they have averaged 16.7, down 42%.

Previously, they also averaged .66 (two thirds) turnovers a game. They have tripled their turnover rate in December to 2.00.

The Cowboys have increased their penalties per game in December by over 20%, from 6.3 per game to 7.7 while the number of opponent penalties have remained virtually the same.

The Cowboys success was due based in part to dominating the time of possession where they ranked #1 during the first three months. In December they are merely pedestrian and ranked #13. They lost an average of 4 minutes of offense a game.

Before December, 62.7% of their scoring drives were TD's rather than field goals. in December, only 38.5% were TD's.

Why? How the Cowboys Can Reverse These Trends

When other teams are beginning to assert themselves and peak in December, the Cowboy's offensive productivity is declining. Two reasons are obvious, teams knew very little about Dak and Zeke, They now do a better job game planning. In addition, the two most productive elements, Dak and Zeke are rookies. Prior to this season they were used to a schedule of 11 to 12 games. To go all the way, they will play 20 NFL games. they are not acclimated to this length of a season.

The Cowboys need to increase the weapons in their arsenal and the next two games would be a perfect opportunity. Yes, you continue to play Dak and Zeke but they should make every effort to integrate McFadden into the gameplans going forward. Mcfadden provides a quality alternative.

Convert McFadden to Fullback

There is another option, a pretty exciting one......Make McFadden the fullback and put Zeke and him both in the game together. It could help to alleviate the fact that the TE position has not been as productive as in the past. It would provide a more powerful running style by the offense. McFadden is also a very capable receiver.

This would not be the first time the Cowboys converted a quality RB to a FB. In fact, Landry did it several times, very successfully.

Duane Thomas was converted to FB to be in the same backfield as Calvin Hill in 1971 with 3 games left in the regular season. Just as soon as they did that, the Cowboys productivity went off the charts, they averaged a combined 6.1 yards a carry for almost 500 yards in those three games. The team scored a combined 129 points in those three games, an average of 43 points a game.

In 1975, the Super Bowl year of the Dirty Dozen, the leading rusher was Robert Newhouse who gained 930 yards in a 14 game season. Two years later the Cowboys drafted Tony Dorsett. They converted Robert Newhouse to FB and they established a running game that propelled them into the next two Super Bowls.

When your FB is a legitimate running threat, as well as both being capable receivers, defenses must respect this. It also takes wear and tear off your RB and produces a blocker at the direct point of attack. With the aging of Witten and the injuries to Hannah and Swaim, as well as Escobar being practically invisible, now would be the time to implement this and give defenses something else to worry about.

Find a Way Not to Waste an Elite Skill Set

There is also an opportunity to do something that normally would not be considered advantageous, however, the Cowboys are built like none other in the NFL:

Without warning, you could insert Romo for a drive. His skill set forces teams to gameplan him differently but that would be extremely difficult if they didn't know when he would be utilized. It would confuse opponent defenses. They could not concentrate on defending against the style and attributes of a single QB.

We all speak about the game being a team sport, what rules say you can't use two quarterbacks? How many teams have two starting QB's capable of playing at a high level. Why can we not benefit from this rare opportunity? Dak is the starter, but Romo comes in for a drive. Maybe he comes in for two, Maybe none. The point is that HC's must respect this and gameplan it which limits their ability to concentrate in another area.

I'm not talking about rotating them, Dak is the starter. But if you rest a RB for a drive, perhaps use a different one for a changeup, why not do the same at QB if you realize there will not be a measurable drop in talent and productivity. It could be at any time in the game, two minute warning before halftime, first drive after halftime, 2nd drive of the game, whatever..

By creating a more diverse set of weapons, by including multiple skill sets, the opponent must dedicate a finite amount of time to a larger variety of weapons, diluting their preparation for each. Even if the Cowboys do it only once, the mere possibility must not be discounted by an opponent.

Regardless, the Cowboys must address their recent drop in offensive production, the answer shouldn't be hugging a bench for 60 minutes, the more, the merrier.
They should run the 2 RB, 2 QB wildcat.

Romo and Dak split out wide, McFadden is the QB and Zeke is the blocking back

Then Dak and Romo run reverses. McFadden hands off to Romo and then Romo pitches to Dak who throws a screen pass to Zeke.

Next play they run the swinging gate.
 

MarionBarberThe4th

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,413
Reaction score
5,389
I would much rather be the offense that uses two differently skilled qb's than be the defense that has to adjust to that.

It's only crazy to inside the box thinkers. It just *feels* incorrect. But if you take a second and envision it your thought process would augment just a little bit
 

The Realist

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,504
Reaction score
2,027
I would much rather be the offense that uses two differently skilled qb's than be the defense that has to adjust to that.

It's only crazy to inside the box thinkers. It just *feels* incorrect. But if you take a second and envision it your thought process would augment just a little bit

What are the odds that you know about football than every HC, OC, and QB coach in the history of the NFL that decided not to run a 2 QB system?
 

haleyrules

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,060
Reaction score
42,877
I would much rather be the offense that uses two differently skilled qb's than be the defense that has to adjust to that.

It's only crazy to inside the box thinkers. It just *feels* incorrect. But if you take a second and envision it your thought process would augment just a little bit
Interesting. Use two QB's in the same game? Landry tried that yrs ago. So did Walsh in SF. It was the offenses that couldn't adjust and find their rythym. It didn't last very long as a theory. Ole Tom tried it with Roger and Graig.
 
Top