To Succeed, Cowboys Must Reverse Disturbing Trends

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,240
Reaction score
32,634
Interesting. Use two QB's in the same game? Landry tried that yrs ago. So did Walsh in SF. It was the offenses that couldn't adjust and find their rythym. It didn't last very long as a theory. Ole Tom tried it with Roger and Graig.

Yes, rotating quarterbacks would be an awful strategy. Neither would it be difficult to adjust to Romo in the game. You just go get him and hit him as hard as you can. There's already a book on Romo. There won't be much need to adjust to him in the lineup.
 

bayeslife

187beatdown
Messages
9,461
Reaction score
8,584
We were running over the Bucs on offense. I think it's fair to say they are a better team at home.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
Our future success is not hinged upon improving our metrics.

We just need to score one more point than opposition. See, not stats or anything needed.
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,671
Reaction score
16,553
A Downward Trend

Before December, the Cowboys averaged 28.7 points a game. In the three December games they have averaged 16.7, down 42%.

Previously, they also averaged .66 (two thirds) turnovers a game. They have tripled their turnover rate in December to 2.00.

The Cowboys have increased their penalties per game in December by over 20%, from 6.3 per game to 7.7 while the number of opponent penalties have remained virtually the same.

The Cowboys success was due based in part to dominating the time of possession where they ranked #1 during the first three months. In December they are merely pedestrian and ranked #13. They lost an average of 4 minutes of offense a game.

Before December, 62.7% of their scoring drives were TD's rather than field goals. in December, only 38.5% were TD's.

Why? How the Cowboys Can Reverse These Trends

When other teams are beginning to assert themselves and peak in December, the Cowboy's offensive productivity is declining. Two reasons are obvious, teams knew very little about Dak and Zeke, They now do a better job game planning. In addition, the two most productive elements, Dak and Zeke are rookies. Prior to this season they were used to a schedule of 11 to 12 games. To go all the way, they will play 20 NFL games. they are not acclimated to this length of a season.

The Cowboys need to increase the weapons in their arsenal and the next two games would be a perfect opportunity. Yes, you continue to play Dak and Zeke but they should make every effort to integrate McFadden into the gameplans going forward. Mcfadden provides a quality alternative.

Convert McFadden to Fullback

There is another option, a pretty exciting one......Make McFadden the fullback and put Zeke and him both in the game together. It could help to alleviate the fact that the TE position has not been as productive as in the past. It would provide a more powerful running style by the offense. McFadden is also a very capable receiver.

This would not be the first time the Cowboys converted a quality RB to a FB. In fact, Landry did it several times, very successfully.

Duane Thomas was converted to FB to be in the same backfield as Calvin Hill in 1971 with 3 games left in the regular season. Just as soon as they did that, the Cowboys productivity went off the charts, they averaged a combined 6.1 yards a carry for almost 500 yards in those three games. The team scored a combined 129 points in those three games, an average of 43 points a game.

In 1975, the Super Bowl year of the Dirty Dozen, the leading rusher was Robert Newhouse who gained 930 yards in a 14 game season. Two years later the Cowboys drafted Tony Dorsett. They converted Robert Newhouse to FB and they established a running game that propelled them into the next two Super Bowls.

When your FB is a legitimate running threat, as well as both being capable receivers, defenses must respect this. It also takes wear and tear off your RB and produces a blocker at the direct point of attack. With the aging of Witten and the injuries to Hannah and Swaim, as well as Escobar being practically invisible, now would be the time to implement this and give defenses something else to worry about.

Find a Way Not to Waste an Elite Skill Set

There is also an opportunity to do something that normally would not be considered advantageous, however, the Cowboys are built like none other in the NFL:

Without warning, you could insert Romo for a drive. His skill set forces teams to gameplan him differently but that would be extremely difficult if they didn't know when he would be utilized. It would confuse opponent defenses. They could not concentrate on defending against the style and attributes of a single QB.

We all speak about the game being a team sport, what rules say you can't use two quarterbacks? How many teams have two starting QB's capable of playing at a high level. Why can we not benefit from this rare opportunity? Dak is the starter, but Romo comes in for a drive. Maybe he comes in for two, Maybe none. The point is that HC's must respect this and gameplan it which limits their ability to concentrate in another area.

I'm not talking about rotating them, Dak is the starter. But if you rest a RB for a drive, perhaps use a different one for a changeup, why not do the same at QB if you realize there will not be a measurable drop in talent and productivity. It could be at any time in the game, two minute warning before halftime, first drive after halftime, 2nd drive of the game, whatever..

By creating a more diverse set of weapons, by including multiple skill sets, the opponent must dedicate a finite amount of time to a larger variety of weapons, diluting their preparation for each. Even if the Cowboys do it only once, the mere possibility must not be discounted by an opponent.

Regardless, the Cowboys must address their recent drop in offensive production, the answer shouldn't be hugging a bench for 60 minutes, the more, the merrier.
you have some good ideas, I love the 2 RB idea, one a FB like McF.
And I already suggested they use romo unexpectedly for a drive qtr or half.
They could try it out next 2 games, but I dont expect to see it.

but Lol you do know JG is still HC ??:huh::muttley:
So dont expect any innovations like you suggest.
 

stilltheguru88

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,737
Reaction score
6,243
Some Cowboy fans are exactly as Stephen A describes :facepalm:. 2 games left and we're talking about a decline. A decline is what happened to Romo in 2007. Let the next two games play out before we start this ********.
 

MarionBarberThe4th

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,363
Reaction score
5,357
Yes. Of all the HC's, OC's and QB coaches who have ever coached in the NFL...how many of them are there that you know more football than?
This question isn't specific enough to adequately be answered while still pertaining to the actual discussion topic.

What you want to ask is: no coach does this, so why would you think it would be a good idea?


Great question! Well I don't know if it would be better overall. Gameplanning and practice reps are probably way more important to a teams success than we know.
Not to mention any potential locker room issues. Some people may see it as favoritism and a message that romo can do things dak can't. So actually I never said I know more than anyone, what I said was:


i would much rather be the offense that uses two differently skilled qb's than be the defense that has to adjust to that.

It's only crazy to inside the box thinkers. It just *feels* incorrect. But if you take a second and envision it your thought process would augment just a little bit

Which is true. If you envision it in actual terms you can see success with something like this. There ARE certain things romo can do that dak can't. And it adds a new weapon for defenses to practice against and prepare for. Total unpredictability pre-snap. That's undeniable.

The biggest downside I see to this is all social. Media, locker room, jerry. But on the field it deserves consideration.


Back to your question tho: this is silly none of those coaches have had this exact unique scenario, no rookie has ever won a Super Bowl AND pretty much all these hypothetical coaches have all failed so who's to say their way was correct?
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,536
Reaction score
17,923
Aren't you the same guy who's fantasy involves Dak getting concussed?
Blimey, bloke. That was unfair. A low blow. Like you and your mum are so perfect.
He wanted a good ending for Romo and took a wrong turn and retraced his steps a bit.

Re the disturbing Decembers, who was the QB?
 

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,509
Reaction score
17,600
Messing with you? He's absolutely right, you did that.
Did I mention my orgy with the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders in the story? You and THEHEREAFTER could have participted but were detained by Ingrid the seven foot 400 pound German maseuse.
 

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
46,812
Reaction score
22,496
keep-calm-and-dance-moonwalk.png



maxresdefault.jpg



Michael-Jackson-Dancing-Silhouette-Pack.jpg



Lot's of ways to take a 'step' back and still succeed...:dance:
 

mahoneybill

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,895
Reaction score
4,509
A Downward Trend

Before December, the Cowboys averaged 28.7 points a game. In the three December games they have averaged 16.7, down 42%.

Previously, they also averaged .66 (two thirds) turnovers a game. They have tripled their turnover rate in December to 2.00.

The Cowboys have increased their penalties per game in December by over 20%, from 6.3 per game to 7.7 while the number of opponent penalties have remained virtually the same.

The Cowboys success was due based in part to dominating the time of possession where they ranked #1 during the first three months. In December they are merely pedestrian and ranked #13. They lost an average of 4 minutes of offense a game.

Before December, 62.7% of their scoring drives were TD's rather than field goals. in December, only 38.5% were TD's.

Why? How the Cowboys Can Reverse These Trends

When other teams are beginning to assert themselves and peak in December, the Cowboy's offensive productivity is declining. Two reasons are obvious, teams knew very little about Dak and Zeke, They now do a better job game planning. In addition, the two most productive elements, Dak and Zeke are rookies. Prior to this season they were used to a schedule of 11 to 12 games. To go all the way, they will play 20 NFL games. they are not acclimated to this length of a season.

The Cowboys need to increase the weapons in their arsenal and the next two games would be a perfect opportunity. Yes, you continue to play Dak and Zeke but they should make every effort to integrate McFadden into the gameplans going forward. Mcfadden provides a quality alternative.

Convert McFadden to Fullback

There is another option, a pretty exciting one......Make McFadden the fullback and put Zeke and him both in the game together. It could help to alleviate the fact that the TE position has not been as productive as in the past. It would provide a more powerful running style by the offense. McFadden is also a very capable receiver.

This would not be the first time the Cowboys converted a quality RB to a FB. In fact, Landry did it several times, very successfully.

Duane Thomas was converted to FB to be in the same backfield as Calvin Hill in 1971 with 3 games left in the regular season. Just as soon as they did that, the Cowboys productivity went off the charts, they averaged a combined 6.1 yards a carry for almost 500 yards in those three games. The team scored a combined 129 points in those three games, an average of 43 points a game.

In 1975, the Super Bowl year of the Dirty Dozen, the leading rusher was Robert Newhouse who gained 930 yards in a 14 game season. Two years later the Cowboys drafted Tony Dorsett. They converted Robert Newhouse to FB and they established a running game that propelled them into the next two Super Bowls.

When your FB is a legitimate running threat, as well as both being capable receivers, defenses must respect this. It also takes wear and tear off your RB and produces a blocker at the direct point of attack. With the aging of Witten and the injuries to Hannah and Swaim, as well as Escobar being practically invisible, now would be the time to implement this and give defenses something else to worry about.

Find a Way Not to Waste an Elite Skill Set

There is also an opportunity to do something that normally would not be considered advantageous, however, the Cowboys are built like none other in the NFL:

Without warning, you could insert Romo for a drive. His skill set forces teams to gameplan him differently but that would be extremely difficult if they didn't know when he would be utilized. It would confuse opponent defenses. They could not concentrate on defending against the style and attributes of a single QB.

We all speak about the game being a team sport, what rules say you can't use two quarterbacks? How many teams have two starting QB's capable of playing at a high level. Why can we not benefit from this rare opportunity? Dak is the starter, but Romo comes in for a drive. Maybe he comes in for two, Maybe none. The point is that HC's must respect this and gameplan it which limits their ability to concentrate in another area.

I'm not talking about rotating them, Dak is the starter. But if you rest a RB for a drive, perhaps use a different one for a changeup, why not do the same at QB if you realize there will not be a measurable drop in talent and productivity. It could be at any time in the game, two minute warning before halftime, first drive after halftime, 2nd drive of the game, whatever..

By creating a more diverse set of weapons, by including multiple skill sets, the opponent must dedicate a finite amount of time to a larger variety of weapons, diluting their preparation for each. Even if the Cowboys do it only once, the mere possibility must not be discounted by an opponent.

Regardless, the Cowboys must address their recent drop in offensive production, the answer shouldn't be hugging a bench for 60 minutes, the more, the merrier.

Shades of Staubach/Morton where Tom Landry actually had them run alternating plays for a game......
 

popp1234

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,146
Reaction score
3,326
Aren't you the same guy who's fantasy involves Dak getting concussed?

Lol! Yes, he is. I asked him the same question after another one of his posts a couple days ago. I'm beginning to wonder if this is one of Romo's close relatives. Hahaha
 
Top